{"title":"半酸溶性鹿角型肾结石的微创治疗。","authors":"I Wall, H Tiselius, E Hellgren","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Among 78 patients with hemiacidrin soluble staghorn renal stones, 23 were treated with a combination of one session of percutaneous debulking and high-energy extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) (Group A); 17 were treated with high-energy ESWL only (Group B); and 38 were treated with low-energy only ESWL (Group C). In all patients percutaneous nephrostomies were inserted and the ESWL procedure was followed by hemiacidrin irrigation. ESWL was performed with anesthesia in Groups A and B, but without anesthesia in Group C. Groups A and B did not differ in number of ESWL sessions or length of hospital stay, and the therapeutic results at discharge and at 6-month follow-up were comparable, whereby 59% of the patients in both groups were either stone-free or had only small ( less than or equal to 3 mm) residual fragments. In Group C more ESWL sessions were performed, and the hospital stay as well as the hemiacidrin irrigation periods were longer. The fraction of stone-free renal units at discharge was significantly higher in Group C than in Group A (p less than 0.05) and after 4 weeks higher than in both Groups A (p less than 0.025) and B (p < 0.05). At 6 month follow-up, 92% of the patients in Group C were either stone-free or had only small ( less than or equal to 3 mm) residual fragments. Combined low-energy ESWL and hemiacidrin irrigation can successfully be used for treatment of even very large infection staghorn stones.</p>","PeriodicalId":80212,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of lithotripsy & stone disease","volume":"3 1","pages":"31-9; discussion 40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimally invasive treatment of hemiacidrin soluble staghorn renal stones.\",\"authors\":\"I Wall, H Tiselius, E Hellgren\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Among 78 patients with hemiacidrin soluble staghorn renal stones, 23 were treated with a combination of one session of percutaneous debulking and high-energy extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) (Group A); 17 were treated with high-energy ESWL only (Group B); and 38 were treated with low-energy only ESWL (Group C). In all patients percutaneous nephrostomies were inserted and the ESWL procedure was followed by hemiacidrin irrigation. ESWL was performed with anesthesia in Groups A and B, but without anesthesia in Group C. Groups A and B did not differ in number of ESWL sessions or length of hospital stay, and the therapeutic results at discharge and at 6-month follow-up were comparable, whereby 59% of the patients in both groups were either stone-free or had only small ( less than or equal to 3 mm) residual fragments. In Group C more ESWL sessions were performed, and the hospital stay as well as the hemiacidrin irrigation periods were longer. The fraction of stone-free renal units at discharge was significantly higher in Group C than in Group A (p less than 0.05) and after 4 weeks higher than in both Groups A (p less than 0.025) and B (p < 0.05). At 6 month follow-up, 92% of the patients in Group C were either stone-free or had only small ( less than or equal to 3 mm) residual fragments. Combined low-energy ESWL and hemiacidrin irrigation can successfully be used for treatment of even very large infection staghorn stones.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of lithotripsy & stone disease\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"31-9; discussion 40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of lithotripsy & stone disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of lithotripsy & stone disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Minimally invasive treatment of hemiacidrin soluble staghorn renal stones.
Among 78 patients with hemiacidrin soluble staghorn renal stones, 23 were treated with a combination of one session of percutaneous debulking and high-energy extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) (Group A); 17 were treated with high-energy ESWL only (Group B); and 38 were treated with low-energy only ESWL (Group C). In all patients percutaneous nephrostomies were inserted and the ESWL procedure was followed by hemiacidrin irrigation. ESWL was performed with anesthesia in Groups A and B, but without anesthesia in Group C. Groups A and B did not differ in number of ESWL sessions or length of hospital stay, and the therapeutic results at discharge and at 6-month follow-up were comparable, whereby 59% of the patients in both groups were either stone-free or had only small ( less than or equal to 3 mm) residual fragments. In Group C more ESWL sessions were performed, and the hospital stay as well as the hemiacidrin irrigation periods were longer. The fraction of stone-free renal units at discharge was significantly higher in Group C than in Group A (p less than 0.05) and after 4 weeks higher than in both Groups A (p less than 0.025) and B (p < 0.05). At 6 month follow-up, 92% of the patients in Group C were either stone-free or had only small ( less than or equal to 3 mm) residual fragments. Combined low-energy ESWL and hemiacidrin irrigation can successfully be used for treatment of even very large infection staghorn stones.