在外部质量实验试验中使用中央配制的试剂。

A Loria, F Pizano, J Perez-Dominguez
{"title":"在外部质量实验试验中使用中央配制的试剂。","authors":"A Loria,&nbsp;F Pizano,&nbsp;J Perez-Dominguez","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors provide the results of a short-term experimental trial in external quality assessment in 42 clinical laboratories conducted by the Mexican Ministry of Health. Assay kits for glucose, urea, and creatinine were prepared by the Ministry. The results may prove useful to organizers of external quality assessments in third-world countries who may opt for this strategy to improve performance. The laboratories performed the tests on reconstituted lyophilized control serum, also prepared by the Ministry. All three assays were performed manually using colorimetric methods. On the basis of their intralaboratory precision (coefficients of variation less than 8%, 8-12%, and greater than 12% for high, medium, and low precision, respectively), 12 laboratories demonstrated high precision for all three tests. Eight laboratories showed medium and low precision for different tests, while the other 22 fell in between. The results showed that the strategy of using centrally prepared reagents to improve interlaboratory agreement did not work well for urea and creatinine, but met expectations for glucose. The laboratories achieved an interlaboratory coefficient of variation of 10% for glucose in this first trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":80043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of centrally prepared reagents in an external quality experimental trial.\",\"authors\":\"A Loria,&nbsp;F Pizano,&nbsp;J Perez-Dominguez\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The authors provide the results of a short-term experimental trial in external quality assessment in 42 clinical laboratories conducted by the Mexican Ministry of Health. Assay kits for glucose, urea, and creatinine were prepared by the Ministry. The results may prove useful to organizers of external quality assessments in third-world countries who may opt for this strategy to improve performance. The laboratories performed the tests on reconstituted lyophilized control serum, also prepared by the Ministry. All three assays were performed manually using colorimetric methods. On the basis of their intralaboratory precision (coefficients of variation less than 8%, 8-12%, and greater than 12% for high, medium, and low precision, respectively), 12 laboratories demonstrated high precision for all three tests. Eight laboratories showed medium and low precision for different tests, while the other 22 fell in between. The results showed that the strategy of using centrally prepared reagents to improve interlaboratory agreement did not work well for urea and creatinine, but met expectations for glucose. The laboratories achieved an interlaboratory coefficient of variation of 10% for glucose in this first trial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这组作者提供了墨西哥卫生部在42个临床实验室进行的一项关于外部质量评估的短期试验的结果。葡萄糖、尿素和肌酐的检测试剂盒由卫生部准备。结果可能对第三世界国家的外部质量评估组织者有用,他们可能会选择这种策略来提高绩效。实验室对同样由卫生部制备的重组冻干对照血清进行了试验。所有三项检测均采用比色法手工进行。根据其实验室内精度(高、中、低精度的变异系数分别小于8%、8-12%和大于12%),12个实验室在所有三种测试中均表现出高精度。8个实验室对不同的测试显示中等和低精度,而其他22个实验室介于两者之间。结果表明,使用集中配制试剂提高实验室间一致性的策略在尿素和肌酐方面效果不佳,但在葡萄糖方面达到了预期。在第一次试验中,实验室间的葡萄糖变异系数为10%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The use of centrally prepared reagents in an external quality experimental trial.

The authors provide the results of a short-term experimental trial in external quality assessment in 42 clinical laboratories conducted by the Mexican Ministry of Health. Assay kits for glucose, urea, and creatinine were prepared by the Ministry. The results may prove useful to organizers of external quality assessments in third-world countries who may opt for this strategy to improve performance. The laboratories performed the tests on reconstituted lyophilized control serum, also prepared by the Ministry. All three assays were performed manually using colorimetric methods. On the basis of their intralaboratory precision (coefficients of variation less than 8%, 8-12%, and greater than 12% for high, medium, and low precision, respectively), 12 laboratories demonstrated high precision for all three tests. Eight laboratories showed medium and low precision for different tests, while the other 22 fell in between. The results showed that the strategy of using centrally prepared reagents to improve interlaboratory agreement did not work well for urea and creatinine, but met expectations for glucose. The laboratories achieved an interlaboratory coefficient of variation of 10% for glucose in this first trial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信