K J Carlson, S P Dretler, R A Roth, E Hatziandreu, K Gladstone, A G Mulley
{"title":"体外冲击波碎石术与经皮肾取石术治疗尿路结石的近期与远期效果比较。","authors":"K J Carlson, S P Dretler, R A Roth, E Hatziandreu, K Gladstone, A G Mulley","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy have become widely used technologies for removal of urinary calculi, despite a lack of adequate evaluative studies. The possibility of long-term adverse effects of these treatments has been raised, particularly an increase in stone recurrence and development of hypertension following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. We conducted a retrospective study of 1,000 patients treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy or percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for upper tract stone disease to assess immediate effectiveness and complications, with prospective follow-up to assess stone recurrence and development of hypertension. The effectiveness of each treatment (defined in terms of patients rendered stone-free or having only fragments at discharge) was similar for most stone types. While stone recurrence rates in the first 2 years after treatment were similar in the two groups, cumulative recurrence at 3 years was higher following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy compared to percutaneous nephrostolithotomy (39% vs. 23%, p = 0.04). However, logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses showed no significant difference in clinically evident recurrence for patients treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Cumulative incidence of clinically evident stone recurrence did not differ significantly between patients with fragments at discharge (20%) and patients rendered stone-free (15%) (p = 0.24). There was no difference in the development of new hypertension requiring medical treatment. Our findings indicate that extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is effective and associated with lower short-term morbidity than percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Stone fragments left behind by lithotripsy do not appear to confer significant risk of early stone recurrence. Further study is necessary to define long-term risk of recurrence following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":80218,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of stone disease","volume":"5 1","pages":"8-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for urinary calculi: comparison of immediate and long-term effects.\",\"authors\":\"K J Carlson, S P Dretler, R A Roth, E Hatziandreu, K Gladstone, A G Mulley\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy have become widely used technologies for removal of urinary calculi, despite a lack of adequate evaluative studies. The possibility of long-term adverse effects of these treatments has been raised, particularly an increase in stone recurrence and development of hypertension following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. We conducted a retrospective study of 1,000 patients treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy or percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for upper tract stone disease to assess immediate effectiveness and complications, with prospective follow-up to assess stone recurrence and development of hypertension. The effectiveness of each treatment (defined in terms of patients rendered stone-free or having only fragments at discharge) was similar for most stone types. While stone recurrence rates in the first 2 years after treatment were similar in the two groups, cumulative recurrence at 3 years was higher following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy compared to percutaneous nephrostolithotomy (39% vs. 23%, p = 0.04). However, logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses showed no significant difference in clinically evident recurrence for patients treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Cumulative incidence of clinically evident stone recurrence did not differ significantly between patients with fragments at discharge (20%) and patients rendered stone-free (15%) (p = 0.24). There was no difference in the development of new hypertension requiring medical treatment. Our findings indicate that extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is effective and associated with lower short-term morbidity than percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Stone fragments left behind by lithotripsy do not appear to confer significant risk of early stone recurrence. Further study is necessary to define long-term risk of recurrence following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of stone disease\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"8-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of stone disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of stone disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
体外冲击波碎石术和经皮肾结石取石术已成为广泛应用的尿路结石清除技术,尽管缺乏充分的评估研究。这些治疗的长期不良反应的可能性已经提高,特别是体外冲击波碎石术后结石复发和高血压发展的增加。我们对1000名接受体外冲击波碎石术或经皮肾取石术治疗上尿路结石的患者进行了回顾性研究,以评估其即时疗效和并发症,并进行了前瞻性随访,以评估结石复发和高血压的发展。对于大多数结石类型,每种治疗方法的有效性(根据患者无结石或出院时只有碎片来定义)是相似的。虽然两组治疗后2年的结石复发率相似,但体外冲击波碎石术3年的累积复发率高于经皮肾取石术(39% vs. 23%, p = 0.04)。然而,logistic回归和Kaplan-Meier分析显示,体外冲击波碎石患者的临床明显复发率无显著差异。临床明显结石复发的累积发生率在出院时有结石碎片的患者(20%)和无结石患者(15%)之间没有显著差异(p = 0.24)。在需要药物治疗的新高血压的发展方面没有差异。我们的研究结果表明体外冲击波碎石术比经皮肾取石术更有效,短期发病率更低。碎石术留下的结石碎片似乎不会产生早期结石复发的显著风险。需要进一步的研究来确定体外冲击波碎石术后复发的长期风险。
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for urinary calculi: comparison of immediate and long-term effects.
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy have become widely used technologies for removal of urinary calculi, despite a lack of adequate evaluative studies. The possibility of long-term adverse effects of these treatments has been raised, particularly an increase in stone recurrence and development of hypertension following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. We conducted a retrospective study of 1,000 patients treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy or percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for upper tract stone disease to assess immediate effectiveness and complications, with prospective follow-up to assess stone recurrence and development of hypertension. The effectiveness of each treatment (defined in terms of patients rendered stone-free or having only fragments at discharge) was similar for most stone types. While stone recurrence rates in the first 2 years after treatment were similar in the two groups, cumulative recurrence at 3 years was higher following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy compared to percutaneous nephrostolithotomy (39% vs. 23%, p = 0.04). However, logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses showed no significant difference in clinically evident recurrence for patients treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Cumulative incidence of clinically evident stone recurrence did not differ significantly between patients with fragments at discharge (20%) and patients rendered stone-free (15%) (p = 0.24). There was no difference in the development of new hypertension requiring medical treatment. Our findings indicate that extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is effective and associated with lower short-term morbidity than percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Stone fragments left behind by lithotripsy do not appear to confer significant risk of early stone recurrence. Further study is necessary to define long-term risk of recurrence following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.