不透射线胆结石的压电碎石:结果和六个月的随访。

The Journal of stone disease Pub Date : 1993-04-01
J K Han, B I Choi, Y B Yoon, Y H Park, C W Kim, M C Han
{"title":"不透射线胆结石的压电碎石:结果和六个月的随访。","authors":"J K Han,&nbsp;B I Choi,&nbsp;Y B Yoon,&nbsp;Y H Park,&nbsp;C W Kim,&nbsp;M C Han","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sixty-eight patients with radiopaque gallbladder stones (38 with a single stone, 30 with multiple stones) were treated with piezoelectric extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and results were compared with those of 69 patients with radiolucent stones (28 with a single stone, 41 with multiple stones). Stones were fragmented to 4 mm or less in 76.8% after 41,466 +/- 36,504 shock waves in the radiolucent stone group and 77.9% after 54,686 +/- 51,024 shock waves in the radiopaque stone group (p = 0.876 and 0.130, respectively). In 137 patients, ten patients were lost to follow-up. Average period of follow-up was 220 +/- 198 days. Six-month clearance rate of the radiolucent stone group was 43.5% and that of the radiopaque stone group was 16.4% (p less than 0.05) Figure 1. Six-month clearance rate of patients with single stones smaller than 2 cm was also significantly higher in the radiolucent stone group than in the radiopaque stone group (69.5% vs 18.6%; p less than 0.01). However, in patients with multiple stones, the presence of calcification did not affect rates of successful fragmentation or 6-month clearance. There was no statistically significant difference in incidence of complications between the radiolucent and radiopaque stone groups. Although the number of cases are small and the follow-up period is short, our results of ESWL on radiopaque gallstones are so far not satisfactory in terms of stone clearance. Strict patient selection is needed unless there is an improvement in the lithotripsy procedure or post-lithotripsy management.</p>","PeriodicalId":80218,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of stone disease","volume":"5 2","pages":"89-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Piezoelectric lithotripsy of radiopaque gallstones: results and six-month follow-up.\",\"authors\":\"J K Han,&nbsp;B I Choi,&nbsp;Y B Yoon,&nbsp;Y H Park,&nbsp;C W Kim,&nbsp;M C Han\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sixty-eight patients with radiopaque gallbladder stones (38 with a single stone, 30 with multiple stones) were treated with piezoelectric extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and results were compared with those of 69 patients with radiolucent stones (28 with a single stone, 41 with multiple stones). Stones were fragmented to 4 mm or less in 76.8% after 41,466 +/- 36,504 shock waves in the radiolucent stone group and 77.9% after 54,686 +/- 51,024 shock waves in the radiopaque stone group (p = 0.876 and 0.130, respectively). In 137 patients, ten patients were lost to follow-up. Average period of follow-up was 220 +/- 198 days. Six-month clearance rate of the radiolucent stone group was 43.5% and that of the radiopaque stone group was 16.4% (p less than 0.05) Figure 1. Six-month clearance rate of patients with single stones smaller than 2 cm was also significantly higher in the radiolucent stone group than in the radiopaque stone group (69.5% vs 18.6%; p less than 0.01). However, in patients with multiple stones, the presence of calcification did not affect rates of successful fragmentation or 6-month clearance. There was no statistically significant difference in incidence of complications between the radiolucent and radiopaque stone groups. Although the number of cases are small and the follow-up period is short, our results of ESWL on radiopaque gallstones are so far not satisfactory in terms of stone clearance. Strict patient selection is needed unless there is an improvement in the lithotripsy procedure or post-lithotripsy management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of stone disease\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"89-95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of stone disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of stone disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对68例胆囊结石患者(单发结石38例,多发结石30例)行压电体外冲击波碎石(ESWL)治疗,并与69例透光结石患者(单发结石28例,多发结石41例)的结果进行比较。透光石组经41,466 +/- 36,504次冲击波后,碎裂率为76.8%;不透光石组经54,686 +/- 51,024次冲击波后,碎裂率为77.9% (p分别为0.876和0.130)。137例患者中,10例患者失访。平均随访时间220±198天。透光石组6个月清除率为43.5%,不透光石组为16.4% (p < 0.05)图1。透光结石组6个月单个结石小于2 cm的清除率也显著高于不透光结石组(69.5% vs 18.6%;P < 0.01)。然而,在多发性结石患者中,钙化的存在并不影响成功碎裂率或6个月清除率。透光组和不透光组的并发症发生率无统计学差异。虽然病例数量少,随访时间短,但我们的ESWL对放射性不透明胆结石的清除效果尚不令人满意。严格的病人选择是必要的,除非有改进的碎石程序或碎石后的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Piezoelectric lithotripsy of radiopaque gallstones: results and six-month follow-up.

Sixty-eight patients with radiopaque gallbladder stones (38 with a single stone, 30 with multiple stones) were treated with piezoelectric extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and results were compared with those of 69 patients with radiolucent stones (28 with a single stone, 41 with multiple stones). Stones were fragmented to 4 mm or less in 76.8% after 41,466 +/- 36,504 shock waves in the radiolucent stone group and 77.9% after 54,686 +/- 51,024 shock waves in the radiopaque stone group (p = 0.876 and 0.130, respectively). In 137 patients, ten patients were lost to follow-up. Average period of follow-up was 220 +/- 198 days. Six-month clearance rate of the radiolucent stone group was 43.5% and that of the radiopaque stone group was 16.4% (p less than 0.05) Figure 1. Six-month clearance rate of patients with single stones smaller than 2 cm was also significantly higher in the radiolucent stone group than in the radiopaque stone group (69.5% vs 18.6%; p less than 0.01). However, in patients with multiple stones, the presence of calcification did not affect rates of successful fragmentation or 6-month clearance. There was no statistically significant difference in incidence of complications between the radiolucent and radiopaque stone groups. Although the number of cases are small and the follow-up period is short, our results of ESWL on radiopaque gallstones are so far not satisfactory in terms of stone clearance. Strict patient selection is needed unless there is an improvement in the lithotripsy procedure or post-lithotripsy management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信