体外冲击波碎石联合化学溶解治疗胱氨酸型尿石症。

The Journal of stone disease Pub Date : 1993-01-01
C Ahlstrand, H G Tiselius
{"title":"体外冲击波碎石联合化学溶解治疗胱氨酸型尿石症。","authors":"C Ahlstrand,&nbsp;H G Tiselius","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Minimally invasive surgical procedures are particularly desirable in patients with cystine stones because of their often multiple previous operations, complicated stone situations, and high risk of recurrences. Twenty-four treatment episodes for cystine stones were carried out, 12 with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) as monotherapy and 12 with a combination of ESWL and percutaneous irrigation with chemolytic solutions. In the ESWL monotherapy group, five of 12 renal units became stone-free and one more patient was discharged stone-free, except for an untreated stone in a calix diverticulum. Combined treatment, most often given in association with more complicated stone situations, rendered seven out of 12 kidneys stone-free. Even in this group, one patient was discharged with an untreated residual stone in a calix diverticulum. Our results show that even complicated cystine stone situations can be successfully treated in a minimally invasive way, with the best results obtained with a combination of ESWL and percutaneous chemolysis. Alkalization of urine seemed to be insufficient in preventing stone formation. No difference in recurrence rate was observed between our two treatment groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":80218,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of stone disease","volume":"5 1","pages":"32-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of cystine urolithiasis by a combination of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and chemolysis.\",\"authors\":\"C Ahlstrand,&nbsp;H G Tiselius\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Minimally invasive surgical procedures are particularly desirable in patients with cystine stones because of their often multiple previous operations, complicated stone situations, and high risk of recurrences. Twenty-four treatment episodes for cystine stones were carried out, 12 with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) as monotherapy and 12 with a combination of ESWL and percutaneous irrigation with chemolytic solutions. In the ESWL monotherapy group, five of 12 renal units became stone-free and one more patient was discharged stone-free, except for an untreated stone in a calix diverticulum. Combined treatment, most often given in association with more complicated stone situations, rendered seven out of 12 kidneys stone-free. Even in this group, one patient was discharged with an untreated residual stone in a calix diverticulum. Our results show that even complicated cystine stone situations can be successfully treated in a minimally invasive way, with the best results obtained with a combination of ESWL and percutaneous chemolysis. Alkalization of urine seemed to be insufficient in preventing stone formation. No difference in recurrence rate was observed between our two treatment groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of stone disease\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"32-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of stone disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of stone disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于胱氨酸结石患者来说,微创手术尤其可取,因为他们以前经常做过多次手术,结石情况复杂,复发风险高。对胱氨酸结石进行了24次治疗,其中12次采用体外冲击波碎石(ESWL)作为单一治疗方法,12次采用体外冲击波碎石和经皮化学溶解溶液冲洗联合治疗。在ESWL单药治疗组中,12个肾单位中有5个无结石,除了一个未经治疗的肾盏憩室结石外,还有1个患者出院时无结石。联合治疗通常与更复杂的结石情况相结合,使12个肾脏中有7个无结石。即使在这一组中,也有一名患者因未治疗的杯憩室残余结石出院。我们的研究结果表明,即使是复杂的胱氨酸结石情况,也可以通过微创方式成功治疗,其中ESWL和经皮化学溶解联合治疗效果最好。尿液的碱化似乎不足以防止结石的形成。两组复发率无明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment of cystine urolithiasis by a combination of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and chemolysis.

Minimally invasive surgical procedures are particularly desirable in patients with cystine stones because of their often multiple previous operations, complicated stone situations, and high risk of recurrences. Twenty-four treatment episodes for cystine stones were carried out, 12 with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) as monotherapy and 12 with a combination of ESWL and percutaneous irrigation with chemolytic solutions. In the ESWL monotherapy group, five of 12 renal units became stone-free and one more patient was discharged stone-free, except for an untreated stone in a calix diverticulum. Combined treatment, most often given in association with more complicated stone situations, rendered seven out of 12 kidneys stone-free. Even in this group, one patient was discharged with an untreated residual stone in a calix diverticulum. Our results show that even complicated cystine stone situations can be successfully treated in a minimally invasive way, with the best results obtained with a combination of ESWL and percutaneous chemolysis. Alkalization of urine seemed to be insufficient in preventing stone formation. No difference in recurrence rate was observed between our two treatment groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信