司法部对大型保险公司的“最惠国待遇”条款提出质疑。

Health care law newsletter Pub Date : 1995-09-01
M Stepovich
{"title":"司法部对大型保险公司的“最惠国待遇”条款提出质疑。","authors":"M Stepovich","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The DOJ's latest actions suggest that MFNs in managed care contracts should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, focusing on the actual or potential impact that the MFNs have on price competition among providers and payors in the relevant marketplace. For health care providers desiring to avoid MFNs, however, the DOJ's heightened activity in this area might furnish an appropriate reason to resist such clauses. To date, the DOJ's focus has been on the market power of payors with MFN status. However, the DOJ's reasoning applies equally to providers that wield buying power in contracting with others. Although the DOJ has yet to take up this latter issue, MFNs imposed by increasingly powerful provider organizations can expect to receive similar scrutiny from the DOJ, especially as their market influence grows.</p>","PeriodicalId":79604,"journal":{"name":"Health care law newsletter","volume":"10 9","pages":"3-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Department of Justice challenging big insurers' \\\"Most Favored Nation\\\" clauses.\",\"authors\":\"M Stepovich\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The DOJ's latest actions suggest that MFNs in managed care contracts should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, focusing on the actual or potential impact that the MFNs have on price competition among providers and payors in the relevant marketplace. For health care providers desiring to avoid MFNs, however, the DOJ's heightened activity in this area might furnish an appropriate reason to resist such clauses. To date, the DOJ's focus has been on the market power of payors with MFN status. However, the DOJ's reasoning applies equally to providers that wield buying power in contracting with others. Although the DOJ has yet to take up this latter issue, MFNs imposed by increasingly powerful provider organizations can expect to receive similar scrutiny from the DOJ, especially as their market influence grows.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health care law newsletter\",\"volume\":\"10 9\",\"pages\":\"3-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health care law newsletter\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health care law newsletter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国司法部的最新行动表明,管理式医疗合同中的mfn应在个案基础上进行评估,重点关注mfn对相关市场中提供者和付款人之间价格竞争的实际或潜在影响。然而,对于希望避免mfn的医疗保健提供者来说,司法部在这一领域的日益活跃可能提供了抵制此类条款的适当理由。迄今为止,美国司法部的重点一直放在具有最惠国地位的支付国的市场力量上。然而,美国司法部的推理同样适用于在与他人签订合同时拥有购买力的提供商。尽管美国司法部尚未着手处理后一个问题,但日益强大的提供商组织施加的mfn可能会受到美国司法部的类似审查,尤其是在它们的市场影响力不断增长的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Department of Justice challenging big insurers' "Most Favored Nation" clauses.

The DOJ's latest actions suggest that MFNs in managed care contracts should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, focusing on the actual or potential impact that the MFNs have on price competition among providers and payors in the relevant marketplace. For health care providers desiring to avoid MFNs, however, the DOJ's heightened activity in this area might furnish an appropriate reason to resist such clauses. To date, the DOJ's focus has been on the market power of payors with MFN status. However, the DOJ's reasoning applies equally to providers that wield buying power in contracting with others. Although the DOJ has yet to take up this latter issue, MFNs imposed by increasingly powerful provider organizations can expect to receive similar scrutiny from the DOJ, especially as their market influence grows.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信