长期家庭保健的病例管理模式。营利性老年护理管理的演变。

L Dolen
{"title":"长期家庭保健的病例管理模式。营利性老年护理管理的演变。","authors":"L Dolen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Professional geriatric care management has the potential to provide an emotionally satisfying, lucrative career for the social worker or nurse who is self-educated or who has formal continuing professional education in assessment, care options, and care coordination. Yet GCM as an organized profession, or as a career choice for the individual, requires institutional supports to grow and flourish. The GCM profession requires recognition by the states (including certification and credentialing). A network must be developed so that young persons can receive a first professional degree, or at least a concentration within nursing or social work, in the legal and financial implications of elder care as well as the biology of aging and the techniques of hands-on physical care of the elderly. Structures must be created for continuing professional education of the GCM practitioner. The various Medicaid programs that offer home care to the elderly and disabled rely heavily on assessment and case management; so does the entire Medicare system. However, the federal statutes and regulations do not explicitly authorize GCM participation in care planning. More to the point, they do not clearly authorize reimbursement of GCMs as independent professionals or as Medicare/Medicaid service providers. As private long-term care insurance evolves, GCM services should be recognized as proper components of the planning process (and therefore as services that can be reimbursed by the policy). Once this is done, the challenge for GCM professionals is to retain their focus on the needs of the elder and family, rather than to perceive themselves as gatekeepers who function to cut the cost of services instead of optimizing their variety and quality.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":80213,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of long term home health care : The PRIDE Institute journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Models of case management in long term home health care. The evolution of for-profit geriatric care management.\",\"authors\":\"L Dolen\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Professional geriatric care management has the potential to provide an emotionally satisfying, lucrative career for the social worker or nurse who is self-educated or who has formal continuing professional education in assessment, care options, and care coordination. Yet GCM as an organized profession, or as a career choice for the individual, requires institutional supports to grow and flourish. The GCM profession requires recognition by the states (including certification and credentialing). A network must be developed so that young persons can receive a first professional degree, or at least a concentration within nursing or social work, in the legal and financial implications of elder care as well as the biology of aging and the techniques of hands-on physical care of the elderly. Structures must be created for continuing professional education of the GCM practitioner. The various Medicaid programs that offer home care to the elderly and disabled rely heavily on assessment and case management; so does the entire Medicare system. However, the federal statutes and regulations do not explicitly authorize GCM participation in care planning. More to the point, they do not clearly authorize reimbursement of GCMs as independent professionals or as Medicare/Medicaid service providers. As private long-term care insurance evolves, GCM services should be recognized as proper components of the planning process (and therefore as services that can be reimbursed by the policy). Once this is done, the challenge for GCM professionals is to retain their focus on the needs of the elder and family, rather than to perceive themselves as gatekeepers who function to cut the cost of services instead of optimizing their variety and quality.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of long term home health care : The PRIDE Institute journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of long term home health care : The PRIDE Institute journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of long term home health care : The PRIDE Institute journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

专业老年护理管理有潜力为那些自学或接受过评估、护理选择和护理协调方面的正规继续专业教育的社会工作者或护士提供一份情感上满意的、有利可图的职业。然而,GCM作为一个有组织的职业,或者作为个人的职业选择,需要制度的支持才能成长和繁荣。GCM职业需要得到各州的认可(包括认证和资格认证)。必须建立一个网络,使年轻人能够获得第一个专业学位,或至少是护理或社会工作方面的专业学位,包括老年人护理的法律和财务影响,以及老龄化生物学和老年人实际身体护理技术。必须为GCM从业者的继续专业教育创建结构。为老年人和残疾人提供家庭护理的各种医疗补助计划严重依赖于评估和病例管理;整个医疗保险体系也是如此。然而,联邦法规并没有明确授权GCM参与护理计划。更重要的是,他们没有明确授权gcm作为独立的专业人员或医疗保险/医疗补助服务提供者进行报销。随着私人长期护理保险的发展,GCM服务应该被认为是计划过程的适当组成部分(因此作为可以由政策报销的服务)。一旦做到这一点,GCM专业人员面临的挑战是保持他们对老年人和家庭需求的关注,而不是将自己视为降低服务成本的看门人,而不是优化服务的种类和质量。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Models of case management in long term home health care. The evolution of for-profit geriatric care management.

Professional geriatric care management has the potential to provide an emotionally satisfying, lucrative career for the social worker or nurse who is self-educated or who has formal continuing professional education in assessment, care options, and care coordination. Yet GCM as an organized profession, or as a career choice for the individual, requires institutional supports to grow and flourish. The GCM profession requires recognition by the states (including certification and credentialing). A network must be developed so that young persons can receive a first professional degree, or at least a concentration within nursing or social work, in the legal and financial implications of elder care as well as the biology of aging and the techniques of hands-on physical care of the elderly. Structures must be created for continuing professional education of the GCM practitioner. The various Medicaid programs that offer home care to the elderly and disabled rely heavily on assessment and case management; so does the entire Medicare system. However, the federal statutes and regulations do not explicitly authorize GCM participation in care planning. More to the point, they do not clearly authorize reimbursement of GCMs as independent professionals or as Medicare/Medicaid service providers. As private long-term care insurance evolves, GCM services should be recognized as proper components of the planning process (and therefore as services that can be reimbursed by the policy). Once this is done, the challenge for GCM professionals is to retain their focus on the needs of the elder and family, rather than to perceive themselves as gatekeepers who function to cut the cost of services instead of optimizing their variety and quality.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信