生殖医学。新程序愚弄了大自然母亲,并回避了伦理辩论。

Hospital ethics Pub Date : 1995-05-01
{"title":"生殖医学。新程序愚弄了大自然母亲,并回避了伦理辩论。","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fetal tissue transplants that rely on abortions, and techniques used in prenatal diagnosis and artificial reproduction, have raised fervent and intractable opposition from the Roman Catholic Church and pro-life groups. Recent medical reports of advances in these areas have acknowledged the arguments offered by these organizations and, in turn, are offering some new ways for resolving the differences, as the following articles show.</p>","PeriodicalId":79630,"journal":{"name":"Hospital ethics","volume":"11 3","pages":"12-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reproductive medicine. New procedures fool Mother Nature and evade ethical debate.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Fetal tissue transplants that rely on abortions, and techniques used in prenatal diagnosis and artificial reproduction, have raised fervent and intractable opposition from the Roman Catholic Church and pro-life groups. Recent medical reports of advances in these areas have acknowledged the arguments offered by these organizations and, in turn, are offering some new ways for resolving the differences, as the following articles show.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital ethics\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"12-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

依赖堕胎的胎儿组织移植,以及产前诊断和人工生殖技术,已经引起了罗马天主教会(Roman Catholic Church)和反堕胎组织的强烈反对。最近关于这些领域进展的医学报告承认了这些组织提出的论点,并反过来提出了一些解决分歧的新方法,如下文所示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reproductive medicine. New procedures fool Mother Nature and evade ethical debate.

Fetal tissue transplants that rely on abortions, and techniques used in prenatal diagnosis and artificial reproduction, have raised fervent and intractable opposition from the Roman Catholic Church and pro-life groups. Recent medical reports of advances in these areas have acknowledged the arguments offered by these organizations and, in turn, are offering some new ways for resolving the differences, as the following articles show.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信