在合并之后。综合服务的质量保证。

Executive housekeeping today Pub Date : 1995-01-01
R Peterson, K Briggs, G Butrymowicz
{"title":"在合并之后。综合服务的质量保证。","authors":"R Peterson,&nbsp;K Briggs,&nbsp;G Butrymowicz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Patient Support Services Supervisory/Lead Staff have adapted well to using the MQAI format. We had always used a Quality control of Inspection sheet internally to evaluated performance levels, correct problems and generate work orders. Interviewing patients directly on a random basis was first approached with some fear and reticence. However, the positive comments, especially about the friendliness of our staff, made the task more enjoyable. The input of the nurse or area manager has been more difficult to obtain because of busy work schedules. We receive mostly favorable marks about our staff's service, quality and attitude. The most consistent feedback reflects the desire of area managers to have a dedicated support service person for their unit. This is not based on job performance, but personality, a support person who \"fits in\" with the other unit staff. This is probably a result of a clear shift to a patient centered care of \"team\" concept. From the MQAI form, we still generate many work orders for the engineering department and seek to correct housekeeping deficiencies. The problem area that seems to stand out is carpet spotting and odor. We have come to the conclusion that due to rising patient acuity levels, carpeting simply does not belong in a patient room. A program to replace carpeted patient rooms, one at a time if necessary, has been initiated. By constant repetition, our staff knows the hospital codes, safety procedures and universal precautions. We are proud to say, the most \"appropriate action\" based on our Quality Assessment and Improvement Plan has been to congratulate our staff for a job well done.</p>","PeriodicalId":79593,"journal":{"name":"Executive housekeeping today","volume":"16 1","pages":"6-8, 13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"After the merger. Quality assurance for combined services.\",\"authors\":\"R Peterson,&nbsp;K Briggs,&nbsp;G Butrymowicz\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Patient Support Services Supervisory/Lead Staff have adapted well to using the MQAI format. We had always used a Quality control of Inspection sheet internally to evaluated performance levels, correct problems and generate work orders. Interviewing patients directly on a random basis was first approached with some fear and reticence. However, the positive comments, especially about the friendliness of our staff, made the task more enjoyable. The input of the nurse or area manager has been more difficult to obtain because of busy work schedules. We receive mostly favorable marks about our staff's service, quality and attitude. The most consistent feedback reflects the desire of area managers to have a dedicated support service person for their unit. This is not based on job performance, but personality, a support person who \\\"fits in\\\" with the other unit staff. This is probably a result of a clear shift to a patient centered care of \\\"team\\\" concept. From the MQAI form, we still generate many work orders for the engineering department and seek to correct housekeeping deficiencies. The problem area that seems to stand out is carpet spotting and odor. We have come to the conclusion that due to rising patient acuity levels, carpeting simply does not belong in a patient room. A program to replace carpeted patient rooms, one at a time if necessary, has been initiated. By constant repetition, our staff knows the hospital codes, safety procedures and universal precautions. We are proud to say, the most \\\"appropriate action\\\" based on our Quality Assessment and Improvement Plan has been to congratulate our staff for a job well done.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Executive housekeeping today\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"6-8, 13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Executive housekeeping today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Executive housekeeping today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患者支持服务主管/领导人员已经很好地适应了MQAI格式的使用。我们一直在内部使用质量控制检查表来评估绩效水平,纠正问题并生成工作订单。首先,在随机的基础上直接采访病人是带着一些恐惧和沉默的。然而,积极的评价,特别是关于我们的工作人员的友好,使任务更加愉快。由于繁忙的工作日程,护士或区域经理的意见更难获得。员工的服务、质量和态度是我们最受好评的。最一致的反馈反映了区域经理希望有一个专门的支持服务人员为他们的单位。这不是基于工作表现,而是基于个性,一个与其他单位员工“合得来”的支持人员。这可能是明显转向以病人为中心的“团队”概念的结果。从MQAI表单中,我们仍然为工程部门生成许多工作订单,并设法纠正内务管理的缺陷。最突出的问题是地毯上的污渍和气味。我们得出的结论是,由于患者的视力水平不断提高,地毯根本不属于病房。如果有必要,一个一个地更换铺有地毯的病房的计划已经启动。通过不断的重复,我们的员工知道医院的守则,安全程序和普遍的预防措施。我们很自豪地说,根据我们的质量评估和改进计划,最“适当的行动”是祝贺我们的员工工作出色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
After the merger. Quality assurance for combined services.

The Patient Support Services Supervisory/Lead Staff have adapted well to using the MQAI format. We had always used a Quality control of Inspection sheet internally to evaluated performance levels, correct problems and generate work orders. Interviewing patients directly on a random basis was first approached with some fear and reticence. However, the positive comments, especially about the friendliness of our staff, made the task more enjoyable. The input of the nurse or area manager has been more difficult to obtain because of busy work schedules. We receive mostly favorable marks about our staff's service, quality and attitude. The most consistent feedback reflects the desire of area managers to have a dedicated support service person for their unit. This is not based on job performance, but personality, a support person who "fits in" with the other unit staff. This is probably a result of a clear shift to a patient centered care of "team" concept. From the MQAI form, we still generate many work orders for the engineering department and seek to correct housekeeping deficiencies. The problem area that seems to stand out is carpet spotting and odor. We have come to the conclusion that due to rising patient acuity levels, carpeting simply does not belong in a patient room. A program to replace carpeted patient rooms, one at a time if necessary, has been initiated. By constant repetition, our staff knows the hospital codes, safety procedures and universal precautions. We are proud to say, the most "appropriate action" based on our Quality Assessment and Improvement Plan has been to congratulate our staff for a job well done.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信