美国心脏协会对美国环保署医疗废物焚化炉条例草案的意见和建议。

Medical waste analyst Pub Date : 1994-08-01
{"title":"美国心脏协会对美国环保署医疗废物焚化炉条例草案的意见和建议。","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The following summarizes specific recommendations with respect to the requested regulatory changes discussed above: 1. Either defer publishing the proposed regulations or exclude the emission limits from the proposed regulations until they have been properly established based upon the specific requirements of Sections 111 and 129. 2. Establish the the emission limits on the basis of proper technical analyses, using all necessary data and information which are readily available, and after consulting with state APC agencies as required under Section 111(f)(3). 3. Establish emission limits and requirements for new facilities based upon actual \"systems\" and according to size classifications. 4. Establish emission limits and requirements for existing facilities using the full range of available data to establish MACT levels according to size classifications. Exclude LAER facilities in the MACT analysis as required under Section 129. 5. Properly account for technical achievability and applicability in setting limits for the various size categories. 6. Properly account for cost and risk implications in establishing emission limits as required under Sections 111 and 129. It is important to highlight that when specific emission values are identified from test data or elsewhere for the in establishing emission limits for new and existing MWIs, it is critical that a proper factor be applied to them as necessary to reflect standard deviations and statistical variables. A recommended methodology for this is included in the U.S. EPA document entitled, Combustion Emissions Technical Resource Document (CETRED), draft, EPA530-4-94-0114, May 1994, Chapter 5, \"Determinations of Technically Achievable Emissions.\" Finally, it is recommended that the U.S. EPA reassess the technical feasibilities and cost implications of various other key issues which have been raised. Such reassessments could be done during the period that emission limits are reassessed and revised.</p>","PeriodicalId":80077,"journal":{"name":"Medical waste analyst","volume":"2 11","pages":"11-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AHA's comments and recommendations to the U.S. EPA's draft medical waste incinerator regulations.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The following summarizes specific recommendations with respect to the requested regulatory changes discussed above: 1. Either defer publishing the proposed regulations or exclude the emission limits from the proposed regulations until they have been properly established based upon the specific requirements of Sections 111 and 129. 2. Establish the the emission limits on the basis of proper technical analyses, using all necessary data and information which are readily available, and after consulting with state APC agencies as required under Section 111(f)(3). 3. Establish emission limits and requirements for new facilities based upon actual \\\"systems\\\" and according to size classifications. 4. Establish emission limits and requirements for existing facilities using the full range of available data to establish MACT levels according to size classifications. Exclude LAER facilities in the MACT analysis as required under Section 129. 5. Properly account for technical achievability and applicability in setting limits for the various size categories. 6. Properly account for cost and risk implications in establishing emission limits as required under Sections 111 and 129. It is important to highlight that when specific emission values are identified from test data or elsewhere for the in establishing emission limits for new and existing MWIs, it is critical that a proper factor be applied to them as necessary to reflect standard deviations and statistical variables. A recommended methodology for this is included in the U.S. EPA document entitled, Combustion Emissions Technical Resource Document (CETRED), draft, EPA530-4-94-0114, May 1994, Chapter 5, \\\"Determinations of Technically Achievable Emissions.\\\" Finally, it is recommended that the U.S. EPA reassess the technical feasibilities and cost implications of various other key issues which have been raised. Such reassessments could be done during the period that emission limits are reassessed and revised.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical waste analyst\",\"volume\":\"2 11\",\"pages\":\"11-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical waste analyst\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical waste analyst","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下总结了有关上述所要求的监管变化的具体建议:要么推迟公布拟议的法规,要么将排放限值从拟议法规中排除,直到根据第111节和第129节的具体要求适当确定排放限值。2. 根据第111(f)(3)条的要求,在适当的技术分析的基础上,利用所有可获得的必要数据和信息,并与州APC机构协商后,确定排放限值。3.根据实际的“系统”和规模分类,为新设施制定排放限制和要求。4. 为现有设施制定排放限制和要求,使用所有可用数据,根据规模分类确定MACT水平。根据第129条的要求,在MACT分析中排除LAER设施。5. 在设定各种尺寸类别的限制时,适当考虑到技术上的可实现性和适用性。6. 按照第111条和第129条的要求,适当考虑在制定排放限值时所涉及的成本和风险。必须强调的是,当从测试数据或其他地方确定特定的排放值以确定新的和现有的海洋气象设施的排放限值时,至关重要的是,必要时对它们适用适当的因素,以反映标准偏差和统计变量。这方面的推荐方法包含在美国环保署文件中,题为燃烧排放技术资源文件(CETRED),草案,EPA530-4-94-0114, 1994年5月,第5章,“技术上可实现的排放的测定”。最后,建议美国环境保护署重新评估所提出的各种其他关键问题的技术可行性和所涉费用。这种重新评估可以在重新评估和修订排放限额期间进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AHA's comments and recommendations to the U.S. EPA's draft medical waste incinerator regulations.

The following summarizes specific recommendations with respect to the requested regulatory changes discussed above: 1. Either defer publishing the proposed regulations or exclude the emission limits from the proposed regulations until they have been properly established based upon the specific requirements of Sections 111 and 129. 2. Establish the the emission limits on the basis of proper technical analyses, using all necessary data and information which are readily available, and after consulting with state APC agencies as required under Section 111(f)(3). 3. Establish emission limits and requirements for new facilities based upon actual "systems" and according to size classifications. 4. Establish emission limits and requirements for existing facilities using the full range of available data to establish MACT levels according to size classifications. Exclude LAER facilities in the MACT analysis as required under Section 129. 5. Properly account for technical achievability and applicability in setting limits for the various size categories. 6. Properly account for cost and risk implications in establishing emission limits as required under Sections 111 and 129. It is important to highlight that when specific emission values are identified from test data or elsewhere for the in establishing emission limits for new and existing MWIs, it is critical that a proper factor be applied to them as necessary to reflect standard deviations and statistical variables. A recommended methodology for this is included in the U.S. EPA document entitled, Combustion Emissions Technical Resource Document (CETRED), draft, EPA530-4-94-0114, May 1994, Chapter 5, "Determinations of Technically Achievable Emissions." Finally, it is recommended that the U.S. EPA reassess the technical feasibilities and cost implications of various other key issues which have been raised. Such reassessments could be done during the period that emission limits are reassessed and revised.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信