冠状动脉溶栓:还是太少太晚?

Health trends Pub Date : 1993-01-01
J Pinkney, S Catnach, A Woods, P Fairclough
{"title":"冠状动脉溶栓:还是太少太晚?","authors":"J Pinkney,&nbsp;S Catnach,&nbsp;A Woods,&nbsp;P Fairclough","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We reviewed the case records of 109 consecutive patients with a definite diagnosis of myocardial infarction, admitted through the accident and emergency department of an inner-city general hospital to identify delays in referral to hospital, admission to the coronary care unit, and start of thrombolysis. Of the 109 patients, only 28 (26%) received streptokinase (the only thrombolytic drug used at this hospital), and at least 47 (58%) of the remaining 81 who should have benefited from it did not. However, the proportion of patients given streptokinase improved significantly after publication of the Second International Study of Infarct Survival (ISIS 2) study results. The average delay from onset of symptoms to presentation at the accident department was over 3 hours, with a further 1 hour in-hospital delay before administration of streptokinase. This study revealed considerable underuse of thrombolytic therapy in cases where treatment was clearly indicated, but this picture improved substantially during the period of audit.</p>","PeriodicalId":79616,"journal":{"name":"Health trends","volume":"25 4","pages":"132-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coronary thrombolysis: still too little too late?\",\"authors\":\"J Pinkney,&nbsp;S Catnach,&nbsp;A Woods,&nbsp;P Fairclough\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We reviewed the case records of 109 consecutive patients with a definite diagnosis of myocardial infarction, admitted through the accident and emergency department of an inner-city general hospital to identify delays in referral to hospital, admission to the coronary care unit, and start of thrombolysis. Of the 109 patients, only 28 (26%) received streptokinase (the only thrombolytic drug used at this hospital), and at least 47 (58%) of the remaining 81 who should have benefited from it did not. However, the proportion of patients given streptokinase improved significantly after publication of the Second International Study of Infarct Survival (ISIS 2) study results. The average delay from onset of symptoms to presentation at the accident department was over 3 hours, with a further 1 hour in-hospital delay before administration of streptokinase. This study revealed considerable underuse of thrombolytic therapy in cases where treatment was clearly indicated, but this picture improved substantially during the period of audit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health trends\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"132-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health trends\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们回顾了109例连续确诊为心肌梗死的患者的病例记录,这些患者通过市中心综合医院的急诊科入院,以确定转诊到医院、进入冠状动脉护理病房和开始溶栓治疗的延误。109例患者中,只有28例(26%)接受了链激酶治疗(该医院唯一使用的溶栓药物),其余81例本应受益的患者中至少47例(58%)没有接受。然而,在第二次国际梗死生存研究(ISIS 2)研究结果发表后,给予链激酶治疗的患者比例显著提高。从出现症状到在事故部门就诊的平均延迟时间超过3小时,在给予链激酶治疗前又延迟了1小时。这项研究显示,在明确指出治疗的病例中,溶栓治疗的使用相当不足,但在审计期间,这一情况得到了显著改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coronary thrombolysis: still too little too late?

We reviewed the case records of 109 consecutive patients with a definite diagnosis of myocardial infarction, admitted through the accident and emergency department of an inner-city general hospital to identify delays in referral to hospital, admission to the coronary care unit, and start of thrombolysis. Of the 109 patients, only 28 (26%) received streptokinase (the only thrombolytic drug used at this hospital), and at least 47 (58%) of the remaining 81 who should have benefited from it did not. However, the proportion of patients given streptokinase improved significantly after publication of the Second International Study of Infarct Survival (ISIS 2) study results. The average delay from onset of symptoms to presentation at the accident department was over 3 hours, with a further 1 hour in-hospital delay before administration of streptokinase. This study revealed considerable underuse of thrombolytic therapy in cases where treatment was clearly indicated, but this picture improved substantially during the period of audit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信