外周和中心肠外营养:成本比较分析。

Health trends Pub Date : 1993-01-01
J May, P Sedman, C Mitchell, J MacFie
{"title":"外周和中心肠外营养:成本比较分析。","authors":"J May,&nbsp;P Sedman,&nbsp;C Mitchell,&nbsp;J MacFie","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concept that total parenteral nutrition (TPN) has to be administered centrally is increasingly recognised to be mistaken: for most patients, peripheral parenteral nutrition provides satisfactory nutritional support. Use of the peripheral route avoids the risks of central venous cannulation--but is it more cost-effective? In a randomized clinical study we examined the costs of TPN in 51 patients who underwent a mean of 8 days of intravenous feeding and conclude that the use of peripheral parenteral nutrition may lead to cost savings.</p>","PeriodicalId":79616,"journal":{"name":"Health trends","volume":"25 4","pages":"129-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peripheral and central parenteral nutrition: a cost-comparison analysis.\",\"authors\":\"J May,&nbsp;P Sedman,&nbsp;C Mitchell,&nbsp;J MacFie\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The concept that total parenteral nutrition (TPN) has to be administered centrally is increasingly recognised to be mistaken: for most patients, peripheral parenteral nutrition provides satisfactory nutritional support. Use of the peripheral route avoids the risks of central venous cannulation--but is it more cost-effective? In a randomized clinical study we examined the costs of TPN in 51 patients who underwent a mean of 8 days of intravenous feeding and conclude that the use of peripheral parenteral nutrition may lead to cost savings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health trends\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"129-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health trends\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

总肠外营养(TPN)必须集中管理的概念越来越被认为是错误的:对于大多数患者,外周肠外营养提供满意的营养支持。外周路径的使用避免了中心静脉插管的风险,但它是否更具成本效益?在一项随机临床研究中,我们检查了51例平均接受8天静脉喂养的TPN患者的成本,并得出结论,使用外周肠外营养可能会节省成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peripheral and central parenteral nutrition: a cost-comparison analysis.

The concept that total parenteral nutrition (TPN) has to be administered centrally is increasingly recognised to be mistaken: for most patients, peripheral parenteral nutrition provides satisfactory nutritional support. Use of the peripheral route avoids the risks of central venous cannulation--but is it more cost-effective? In a randomized clinical study we examined the costs of TPN in 51 patients who underwent a mean of 8 days of intravenous feeding and conclude that the use of peripheral parenteral nutrition may lead to cost savings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信