{"title":"外周和中心肠外营养:成本比较分析。","authors":"J May, P Sedman, C Mitchell, J MacFie","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concept that total parenteral nutrition (TPN) has to be administered centrally is increasingly recognised to be mistaken: for most patients, peripheral parenteral nutrition provides satisfactory nutritional support. Use of the peripheral route avoids the risks of central venous cannulation--but is it more cost-effective? In a randomized clinical study we examined the costs of TPN in 51 patients who underwent a mean of 8 days of intravenous feeding and conclude that the use of peripheral parenteral nutrition may lead to cost savings.</p>","PeriodicalId":79616,"journal":{"name":"Health trends","volume":"25 4","pages":"129-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peripheral and central parenteral nutrition: a cost-comparison analysis.\",\"authors\":\"J May, P Sedman, C Mitchell, J MacFie\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The concept that total parenteral nutrition (TPN) has to be administered centrally is increasingly recognised to be mistaken: for most patients, peripheral parenteral nutrition provides satisfactory nutritional support. Use of the peripheral route avoids the risks of central venous cannulation--but is it more cost-effective? In a randomized clinical study we examined the costs of TPN in 51 patients who underwent a mean of 8 days of intravenous feeding and conclude that the use of peripheral parenteral nutrition may lead to cost savings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health trends\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"129-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health trends\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Peripheral and central parenteral nutrition: a cost-comparison analysis.
The concept that total parenteral nutrition (TPN) has to be administered centrally is increasingly recognised to be mistaken: for most patients, peripheral parenteral nutrition provides satisfactory nutritional support. Use of the peripheral route avoids the risks of central venous cannulation--but is it more cost-effective? In a randomized clinical study we examined the costs of TPN in 51 patients who underwent a mean of 8 days of intravenous feeding and conclude that the use of peripheral parenteral nutrition may lead to cost savings.