道德共同体的轨迹得到了新的审视。

Hospital ethics Pub Date : 1994-03-01
{"title":"道德共同体的轨迹得到了新的审视。","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ethics consultation, and indeed the whole field of bioethics, is built on the premise that everyone would benefit from the insights of others when facing ethical problems or issues. Who those others should be and how their insights should be shared is currently the focus of serious debate, as the following articles show.</p>","PeriodicalId":79630,"journal":{"name":"Hospital ethics","volume":"10 2","pages":"7-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Locus of the moral community gets new examination.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ethics consultation, and indeed the whole field of bioethics, is built on the premise that everyone would benefit from the insights of others when facing ethical problems or issues. Who those others should be and how their insights should be shared is currently the focus of serious debate, as the following articles show.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital ethics\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"7-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

伦理咨询,乃至整个生命伦理领域,都是建立在这样一个前提之上的:当面临伦理问题或问题时,每个人都能从他人的见解中受益。正如下面的文章所示,这些其他人应该是谁,以及他们的见解应该如何分享,这是当前严肃辩论的焦点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Locus of the moral community gets new examination.

Ethics consultation, and indeed the whole field of bioethics, is built on the premise that everyone would benefit from the insights of others when facing ethical problems or issues. Who those others should be and how their insights should be shared is currently the focus of serious debate, as the following articles show.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信