抗肿瘤药物:权威药典超说明书用法比较。

Hospital formulary Pub Date : 1993-07-01
D F Thompson, C C Keefe
{"title":"抗肿瘤药物:权威药典超说明书用法比较。","authors":"D F Thompson,&nbsp;C C Keefe","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Unlabeled indications for antineoplastic drugs listed in the American Hospital Formulary-Drug Information, United States Pharmacopeia Dispensing Information-Drug Information for the Health Care Professional (Volume 1), and the American Medical Association-Drug Evaluations were evaluated. Specifically, the total number of unlabeled and unique uses (ie, not listed in either of the other two compendia) of 35 antineoplastic drugs were compared. Using a nonparametric analysis of variance to evaluate the results, significant differences in both the average unlabeled indications per drug and unique unlabeled indications per drug were found among the resources checked. The implications of the study results on reimbursement by private insurance carriers of unlabeled antineoplastic drug use is discussed in this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":76912,"journal":{"name":"Hospital formulary","volume":"28 7","pages":"641-2, 647"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antineoplastic agents: comparing off-label uses among authoritative drug compendia.\",\"authors\":\"D F Thompson,&nbsp;C C Keefe\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Unlabeled indications for antineoplastic drugs listed in the American Hospital Formulary-Drug Information, United States Pharmacopeia Dispensing Information-Drug Information for the Health Care Professional (Volume 1), and the American Medical Association-Drug Evaluations were evaluated. Specifically, the total number of unlabeled and unique uses (ie, not listed in either of the other two compendia) of 35 antineoplastic drugs were compared. Using a nonparametric analysis of variance to evaluate the results, significant differences in both the average unlabeled indications per drug and unique unlabeled indications per drug were found among the resources checked. The implications of the study results on reimbursement by private insurance carriers of unlabeled antineoplastic drug use is discussed in this article.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital formulary\",\"volume\":\"28 7\",\"pages\":\"641-2, 647\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital formulary\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital formulary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《美国医院处方药物信息》、《美国药典配药信息-卫生保健专业人员用药信息(第一卷)》和《美国医学协会药物评价》中列出的抗肿瘤药物的未标记适应症进行了评估。具体而言,比较35种抗肿瘤药物的未标注和独特用途(即未在其他两种药典中列出)的总数。使用非参数方差分析来评估结果,在检查的资源中,每种药物的平均未标记适应症和每种药物的独特未标记适应症均存在显著差异。本文讨论了研究结果对私营保险公司报销未标记抗肿瘤药物的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antineoplastic agents: comparing off-label uses among authoritative drug compendia.

Unlabeled indications for antineoplastic drugs listed in the American Hospital Formulary-Drug Information, United States Pharmacopeia Dispensing Information-Drug Information for the Health Care Professional (Volume 1), and the American Medical Association-Drug Evaluations were evaluated. Specifically, the total number of unlabeled and unique uses (ie, not listed in either of the other two compendia) of 35 antineoplastic drugs were compared. Using a nonparametric analysis of variance to evaluate the results, significant differences in both the average unlabeled indications per drug and unique unlabeled indications per drug were found among the resources checked. The implications of the study results on reimbursement by private insurance carriers of unlabeled antineoplastic drug use is discussed in this article.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信