OSHA血源性病原体标准:一年后医师办公室合规审查。

The Medical staff counselor Pub Date : 1993-01-01
P W Smith
{"title":"OSHA血源性病原体标准:一年后医师办公室合规审查。","authors":"P W Smith","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In May 1993, medical practices for the first time were required to review their bloodborne pathogens programs for compliance with a 1991 standard issued by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The standard has a commendable purpose--to enhance the protection afforded workers exposed to potentially infectious materials. Yet its requirements have caused fear and confusion among physicians. This article details the provisions of the bloodborne pathogens standard and outlines some of the reasons physicians have found its implementation troublesome.</p>","PeriodicalId":79747,"journal":{"name":"The Medical staff counselor","volume":"7 4","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OSHA's bloodborne pathogens standard: a review of physician office compliance after the first year.\",\"authors\":\"P W Smith\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In May 1993, medical practices for the first time were required to review their bloodborne pathogens programs for compliance with a 1991 standard issued by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The standard has a commendable purpose--to enhance the protection afforded workers exposed to potentially infectious materials. Yet its requirements have caused fear and confusion among physicians. This article details the provisions of the bloodborne pathogens standard and outlines some of the reasons physicians have found its implementation troublesome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Medical staff counselor\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Medical staff counselor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Medical staff counselor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1993年5月,医疗实践第一次被要求审查他们的血源性病原体项目,以符合1991年职业安全与健康管理局发布的标准。该标准有一个值得称赞的目的——加强对暴露于潜在传染性材料的工人的保护。然而,它的要求在医生中引起了恐惧和困惑。本文详细介绍了血源性病原体标准的规定,并概述了医生发现其执行困难的一些原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
OSHA's bloodborne pathogens standard: a review of physician office compliance after the first year.

In May 1993, medical practices for the first time were required to review their bloodborne pathogens programs for compliance with a 1991 standard issued by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The standard has a commendable purpose--to enhance the protection afforded workers exposed to potentially infectious materials. Yet its requirements have caused fear and confusion among physicians. This article details the provisions of the bloodborne pathogens standard and outlines some of the reasons physicians have found its implementation troublesome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信