{"title":"剖宫产术中的抗生素预防:利用个案成本比较影响处方做法。","authors":"B Weir","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Results of a previously conducted DUE revealed that 91% of obstetric patients received antibiotic prophylaxis with cefoxitin despite the existence of obstetric department guidelines recommending the use of cefazolin. In the present DUE, antibiotic selection in C-section prophylaxis was reviewed and individual prescribers, both compliant and noncompliant with guidelines, were identified. Over a 2-month period, physicians who prescribed other than cefazolin for C-section prophylaxis were issued \"Dear Doctor\" letters, reminding them of existing guidelines. A significant change in prescribing patterns following this intervention was not demonstrated. A multidisciplinary approach was then undertaken. Prescribers were stratified by number of procedures, antibiotic requested, and antibiotic cost per case (average and median). Results were reviewed with Co-chiefs of Ob/Gyn. Letters to both compliant and noncompliant prescribers were issued. A grand rounds presentation describing the results of the DUE was also given. A follow-up review showed that the conversion to cefazolin prophylaxis reached 80%, with accompanied extrapolated yearly cost avoidance of nearly $5,500.</p>","PeriodicalId":76912,"journal":{"name":"Hospital formulary","volume":"28 3","pages":"285-6, 289-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section: use of cost per case comparison to influence prescribing practices.\",\"authors\":\"B Weir\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Results of a previously conducted DUE revealed that 91% of obstetric patients received antibiotic prophylaxis with cefoxitin despite the existence of obstetric department guidelines recommending the use of cefazolin. In the present DUE, antibiotic selection in C-section prophylaxis was reviewed and individual prescribers, both compliant and noncompliant with guidelines, were identified. Over a 2-month period, physicians who prescribed other than cefazolin for C-section prophylaxis were issued \\\"Dear Doctor\\\" letters, reminding them of existing guidelines. A significant change in prescribing patterns following this intervention was not demonstrated. A multidisciplinary approach was then undertaken. Prescribers were stratified by number of procedures, antibiotic requested, and antibiotic cost per case (average and median). Results were reviewed with Co-chiefs of Ob/Gyn. Letters to both compliant and noncompliant prescribers were issued. A grand rounds presentation describing the results of the DUE was also given. A follow-up review showed that the conversion to cefazolin prophylaxis reached 80%, with accompanied extrapolated yearly cost avoidance of nearly $5,500.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital formulary\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"285-6, 289-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital formulary\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital formulary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section: use of cost per case comparison to influence prescribing practices.
Results of a previously conducted DUE revealed that 91% of obstetric patients received antibiotic prophylaxis with cefoxitin despite the existence of obstetric department guidelines recommending the use of cefazolin. In the present DUE, antibiotic selection in C-section prophylaxis was reviewed and individual prescribers, both compliant and noncompliant with guidelines, were identified. Over a 2-month period, physicians who prescribed other than cefazolin for C-section prophylaxis were issued "Dear Doctor" letters, reminding them of existing guidelines. A significant change in prescribing patterns following this intervention was not demonstrated. A multidisciplinary approach was then undertaken. Prescribers were stratified by number of procedures, antibiotic requested, and antibiotic cost per case (average and median). Results were reviewed with Co-chiefs of Ob/Gyn. Letters to both compliant and noncompliant prescribers were issued. A grand rounds presentation describing the results of the DUE was also given. A follow-up review showed that the conversion to cefazolin prophylaxis reached 80%, with accompanied extrapolated yearly cost avoidance of nearly $5,500.