区分医疗服务提供者违背患者同意时的过失与故意侵权。

The Medical staff counselor Pub Date : 1993-01-01
C A Cole, M D Holtz
{"title":"区分医疗服务提供者违背患者同意时的过失与故意侵权。","authors":"C A Cole,&nbsp;M D Holtz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A number of California appellate courts have held that a health care provider's unintentional deviation from a patient's consent will support a cause of action for \"technical battery\"--an intentional tort. This policy has allowed plaintiffs to circumvent California's statutory malpractice damage limits and seek punitive damages, thus posing a significant threat to the foundation of California medical malpractice tort law reform. The California Supreme Court recently acknowledged the problem and appears to be taking steps toward a solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":79747,"journal":{"name":"The Medical staff counselor","volume":"7 2","pages":"45-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distinguishing negligence from intentional tort when a health care provider deviates from a patient's consent.\",\"authors\":\"C A Cole,&nbsp;M D Holtz\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A number of California appellate courts have held that a health care provider's unintentional deviation from a patient's consent will support a cause of action for \\\"technical battery\\\"--an intentional tort. This policy has allowed plaintiffs to circumvent California's statutory malpractice damage limits and seek punitive damages, thus posing a significant threat to the foundation of California medical malpractice tort law reform. The California Supreme Court recently acknowledged the problem and appears to be taking steps toward a solution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Medical staff counselor\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"45-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Medical staff counselor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Medical staff counselor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加利福尼亚州的一些上诉法院认为,医疗服务提供者无意中偏离患者的同意将支持“技术性殴打”的诉讼理由,这是一种故意侵权行为。这一政策使得原告可以规避加州的法定医疗事故损害赔偿限制并寻求惩罚性损害赔偿,从而对加州医疗事故侵权法改革的基础构成了重大威胁。加州最高法院最近承认了这一问题,似乎正在采取措施寻求解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distinguishing negligence from intentional tort when a health care provider deviates from a patient's consent.

A number of California appellate courts have held that a health care provider's unintentional deviation from a patient's consent will support a cause of action for "technical battery"--an intentional tort. This policy has allowed plaintiffs to circumvent California's statutory malpractice damage limits and seek punitive damages, thus posing a significant threat to the foundation of California medical malpractice tort law reform. The California Supreme Court recently acknowledged the problem and appears to be taking steps toward a solution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信