受托人的道德责任:一些初步的想法。

IF 3.2 3区管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT

Nonprofit Management & Leadership Pub Date : 1992-01-01 DOI:10.1002/nml.4130020404

D H Smith

{"title":"受托人的道德责任:一些初步的想法。","authors":"D H Smith","doi":"10.1002/nml.4130020404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of a trustee is unclear to most people, including many trustees. The author proposes a view of trustees as persons who have public responsibility for private or independent provision of a public good. This is a moral definition of trusteeship; without trusteeship a pluralist society would be in trouble. The author argues that trustees should be constrained by fiduciary duties, the common good, an interpretative responsibility, and some procedural norms.","PeriodicalId":47683,"journal":{"name":"Nonprofit Management & Leadership","volume":"2 4","pages":"351-62"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/nml.4130020404","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moral responsibilities of trustees: some first thoughts.\",\"authors\":\"D H Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nml.4130020404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The role of a trustee is unclear to most people, including many trustees. The author proposes a view of trustees as persons who have public responsibility for private or independent provision of a public good. This is a moral definition of trusteeship; without trusteeship a pluralist society would be in trouble. The author argues that trustees should be constrained by fiduciary duties, the common good, an interpretative responsibility, and some procedural norms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nonprofit Management & Leadership\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"351-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/nml.4130020404\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nonprofit Management & Leadership\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.4130020404\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nonprofit Management & Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.4130020404","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10

摘要

大多数人，包括许多受托人，都不清楚受托人的角色。作者建议将受托人视为对私人或独立提供公共物品负有公共责任的人。这是对托管的道德定义;没有托管制度，一个多元化的社会就会陷入困境。作者认为受托人应该受到信义义务、共同利益、解释性责任和一些程序规范的约束。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Moral responsibilities of trustees: some first thoughts.

The role of a trustee is unclear to most people, including many trustees. The author proposes a view of trustees as persons who have public responsibility for private or independent provision of a public good. This is a moral definition of trusteeship; without trusteeship a pluralist society would be in trouble. The author argues that trustees should be constrained by fiduciary duties, the common good, an interpretative responsibility, and some procedural norms.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Nonprofit Management & Leadership Multiple-

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

21.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： Nonprofit Management and Leadership (NML) publishes the field''s best conceptual advances in understanding management, leadership, or governance of private nonprofit organizations. Each issue of NML offers readers the authoritative insights of top scholars on the common concerns of nonprofit managers, leaders, and boards in all private nonprofit settings, including social services, the arts, education, foundations, community development, religion, and member associations. The journal publishes full research monographs up to 10,000 words, and research notes up to 5,500 words. All research methods and approaches are welcome, so long as authors can articulate substantial advances in knowledge relevant to the field and implications for practice.