{"title":"医疗保健诉讼:在惩罚性赔偿裁决中实现公平与合理。","authors":"C A Cole, S J Bernheim, M D Holtz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article, the eighth in a series on health care litigation, discusses whether due process considerations require that the common-law procedures for awarding punitive damages be modified and whether juries have undue discretion in awarding punitive damages. The authors analyze an important recent United States Supreme Court punitive damages case and examine the changes states may need to make in their punitive damages assessment procedures to conform with the Supreme Court's holding.</p>","PeriodicalId":79747,"journal":{"name":"The Medical staff counselor","volume":"5 3","pages":"29-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health care litigation: achieving fairness and reasonableness in punitive damages awards.\",\"authors\":\"C A Cole, S J Bernheim, M D Holtz\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article, the eighth in a series on health care litigation, discusses whether due process considerations require that the common-law procedures for awarding punitive damages be modified and whether juries have undue discretion in awarding punitive damages. The authors analyze an important recent United States Supreme Court punitive damages case and examine the changes states may need to make in their punitive damages assessment procedures to conform with the Supreme Court's holding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Medical staff counselor\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"29-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Medical staff counselor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Medical staff counselor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Health care litigation: achieving fairness and reasonableness in punitive damages awards.
This article, the eighth in a series on health care litigation, discusses whether due process considerations require that the common-law procedures for awarding punitive damages be modified and whether juries have undue discretion in awarding punitive damages. The authors analyze an important recent United States Supreme Court punitive damages case and examine the changes states may need to make in their punitive damages assessment procedures to conform with the Supreme Court's holding.