粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)在接受骨髓抑制化疗治疗癌症患者中的应用。省全身性治疗疾病现场组。

J Rusthoven, V Bramwell, B Stephenson
{"title":"粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)在接受骨髓抑制化疗治疗癌症患者中的应用。省全身性治疗疾病现场组。","authors":"J Rusthoven,&nbsp;V Bramwell,&nbsp;B Stephenson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Guideline questions: </strong>1) Does G-CSF reduce the incidence of important adverse clinical outcomes due to infections in patients with cancer treated with myelosuppressive therapy? 2) Does G-CSF allow maintenance of the chemotherapy dose with the goal of improving survival?</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the evidence for the role of G-CSF in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Clinical outcomes reflecting events that may affect quality of life and/or resource utilization (e.g., rates and duration of hospitalization, antibiotic use); outcomes reflecting the effect of treatment on infection rates, tumour response and survival and those related to the biological effect of G-CSF.</p><p><strong>Perspective (values): </strong>Evidence was selected, reviewed and synthesized by members of the Provincial Systemic Treatment Disease Site Group (DSG) of the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative. Drafts of this document have been circulated and reviewed by members of the Systemic Treatment DSG. The DSG comprises medical oncologists, pharmacists, supportive care personnel and administrators. Evaluation by clinicians was considered in the final practice guideline. Community representatives did not participate in the development of this report but will in future reports. Guidelines approval does require participation by community representatives.</p><p><strong>Quality of evidence: </strong>Two published guidelines and an update of one guideline were identified. Ten eligible randomized controlled trials published in English were included.</p><p><strong>Benefits: </strong>A meta-analysis of data from 8 trials showed that the odds of experiencing febrile neutropenia with G-CSF were significantly reduced (odds ratio 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27 to 0.52; p < 0.00001). G-CSF reduced the risk of febrile neutropenia by 34% (risk ratio 0.66; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.86; p = 0.0015). The use of G-CSF was associated with a significant reduction in antibiotic usage and days spent in hospital in 2 trials and had no effect in the other 4 in which it was measured. Five trials reported no difference in overall median survival, with 2 small trials detecting a significant increase related to G-CSF. However, further research is necessary to confirm these results.</p><p><strong>Harms: </strong>The toxic effects of G-CSF are relatively mild. The most consistent clinical symptom attributed to G-CSF is bone pain, reported in incidence rates ranging from 20% to 50% in 3 trials. Except for one case, reported bone pain was mild.</p><p><strong>Practice guideline: </strong>In cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) may be beneficial for some patients. If a reduction in the number of febrile neutropenic episodes, or in the duration of such episodes, is expected to improve quality of life, then G-CSF is a reasonable treatment option for selected patients. A clear justification for the use of G-CSF should be stated. If the objective of using G-CSF is to maintain dose intensity of antitumour agents, then G-CSF can be recommended where reduction in dose intensity has been shown in randomized controlled trials to reduce survival or disease-free survival. Although the evidence is weaker, the Systemic Treatment DSG would support the practice endorsed by other guidelines (American Society of Clinical Oncology, Ontario Drug Benefit Plan) and would recommend G-CSF for patients receiving potentially curative chemotherapy: i) as primary prophylaxis; that is, where dose reductions below a specified level are required because of a known high risk of febrile neutropenia, or ii) as secondary prophylaxis in patients receiving chemotherapy of established efficacy who have suffered a prior serious episode of febrile neutropenia due to the same chemotherapy regimen. The exact cut-off for dose reductions is unknown at this time and ought to be left to the judgement of the clinician. In general, the use of G-CSF for dose reductions lower than 20% is not recommended. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)</p>","PeriodicalId":79570,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC","volume":"2 4","pages":"179-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer. Provincial Systemic Treatment Disease Site Group.\",\"authors\":\"J Rusthoven,&nbsp;V Bramwell,&nbsp;B Stephenson\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Guideline questions: </strong>1) Does G-CSF reduce the incidence of important adverse clinical outcomes due to infections in patients with cancer treated with myelosuppressive therapy? 2) Does G-CSF allow maintenance of the chemotherapy dose with the goal of improving survival?</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the evidence for the role of G-CSF in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Clinical outcomes reflecting events that may affect quality of life and/or resource utilization (e.g., rates and duration of hospitalization, antibiotic use); outcomes reflecting the effect of treatment on infection rates, tumour response and survival and those related to the biological effect of G-CSF.</p><p><strong>Perspective (values): </strong>Evidence was selected, reviewed and synthesized by members of the Provincial Systemic Treatment Disease Site Group (DSG) of the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative. Drafts of this document have been circulated and reviewed by members of the Systemic Treatment DSG. The DSG comprises medical oncologists, pharmacists, supportive care personnel and administrators. Evaluation by clinicians was considered in the final practice guideline. Community representatives did not participate in the development of this report but will in future reports. Guidelines approval does require participation by community representatives.</p><p><strong>Quality of evidence: </strong>Two published guidelines and an update of one guideline were identified. Ten eligible randomized controlled trials published in English were included.</p><p><strong>Benefits: </strong>A meta-analysis of data from 8 trials showed that the odds of experiencing febrile neutropenia with G-CSF were significantly reduced (odds ratio 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27 to 0.52; p < 0.00001). G-CSF reduced the risk of febrile neutropenia by 34% (risk ratio 0.66; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.86; p = 0.0015). The use of G-CSF was associated with a significant reduction in antibiotic usage and days spent in hospital in 2 trials and had no effect in the other 4 in which it was measured. Five trials reported no difference in overall median survival, with 2 small trials detecting a significant increase related to G-CSF. However, further research is necessary to confirm these results.</p><p><strong>Harms: </strong>The toxic effects of G-CSF are relatively mild. The most consistent clinical symptom attributed to G-CSF is bone pain, reported in incidence rates ranging from 20% to 50% in 3 trials. Except for one case, reported bone pain was mild.</p><p><strong>Practice guideline: </strong>In cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) may be beneficial for some patients. If a reduction in the number of febrile neutropenic episodes, or in the duration of such episodes, is expected to improve quality of life, then G-CSF is a reasonable treatment option for selected patients. A clear justification for the use of G-CSF should be stated. If the objective of using G-CSF is to maintain dose intensity of antitumour agents, then G-CSF can be recommended where reduction in dose intensity has been shown in randomized controlled trials to reduce survival or disease-free survival. Although the evidence is weaker, the Systemic Treatment DSG would support the practice endorsed by other guidelines (American Society of Clinical Oncology, Ontario Drug Benefit Plan) and would recommend G-CSF for patients receiving potentially curative chemotherapy: i) as primary prophylaxis; that is, where dose reductions below a specified level are required because of a known high risk of febrile neutropenia, or ii) as secondary prophylaxis in patients receiving chemotherapy of established efficacy who have suffered a prior serious episode of febrile neutropenia due to the same chemotherapy regimen. The exact cut-off for dose reductions is unknown at this time and ought to be left to the judgement of the clinician. In general, the use of G-CSF for dose reductions lower than 20% is not recommended. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"179-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

指南问题:1)在接受骨髓抑制治疗的癌症患者中,G-CSF是否能降低因感染引起的重要不良临床结局的发生率?2) G-CSF是否允许维持以提高生存率为目标的化疗剂量?目的:评价G-CSF在肿瘤骨髓抑制化疗患者中的作用。结局:反映可能影响生活质量和/或资源利用的事件的临床结局(例如,住院率和住院时间、抗生素使用);结果反映了治疗对感染率、肿瘤反应和生存的影响以及与G-CSF生物学效应相关的结果。观点(价值):证据是由安大略省癌症护理实践指南倡议的省全身性治疗疾病现场组(DSG)的成员选择、审查和合成的。本文件的草稿已由系统治疗DSG的成员分发和审查。DSG由肿瘤学家、药剂师、支持性护理人员和行政人员组成。临床医生的评估在最终的实践指南中被考虑。社区代表没有参与本报告的编写,但将在今后的报告中参与。准则的批准确实需要社区代表的参与。证据质量:确定了两份已发表的指南和一份指南的更新。纳入10项用英文发表的符合条件的随机对照试验。益处:对8项试验数据的荟萃分析显示,G-CSF患者出现发热性中性粒细胞减少的几率显著降低(优势比0.38;95%置信区间[CI] 0.27 ~ 0.52;P < 0.00001)。G-CSF使发热性中性粒细胞减少的风险降低34%(风险比0.66;95% CI 0.51 ~ 0.86;P = 0.0015)。在2项试验中,G-CSF的使用与抗生素使用量和住院天数的显著减少有关,而在另外4项试验中,G-CSF的使用没有影响。5项试验报告总体中位生存期无差异,2项小型试验发现与G-CSF相关的显著增加。然而,需要进一步的研究来证实这些结果。危害:G-CSF的毒性作用相对较轻。G-CSF最一致的临床症状是骨痛,在3项试验中报道的发生率在20%至50%之间。除一例外,报告的骨痛是轻微的。实践指南:在接受骨髓抑制化疗的癌症患者中,粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)可能对某些患者有益。如果减少发热性中性粒细胞减少发作的次数,或减少这种发作的持续时间,有望改善生活质量,那么G-CSF是选定患者的合理治疗选择。应说明使用G-CSF的明确理由。如果使用G-CSF的目的是维持抗肿瘤药物的剂量强度,那么在随机对照试验中显示降低剂量强度以降低生存率或无病生存率的情况下,可以推荐使用G-CSF。尽管证据较弱,但系统性治疗DSG将支持其他指南(美国临床肿瘤学会,安大略省药物获益计划)认可的做法,并将推荐G-CSF用于接受潜在治愈性化疗的患者:1)作为初级预防;也就是说,由于已知发热性中性粒细胞减少的高风险,需要将剂量减少到指定水平以下,或ii)对于先前因相同的化疗方案而遭受严重发热性中性粒细胞减少的患者,作为接受确定疗效的化疗的二级预防。剂量减少的确切截止时间目前尚不清楚,应留给临床医生判断。一般来说,不建议在剂量减少低于20%时使用G-CSF。(抽象截断)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer. Provincial Systemic Treatment Disease Site Group.

Guideline questions: 1) Does G-CSF reduce the incidence of important adverse clinical outcomes due to infections in patients with cancer treated with myelosuppressive therapy? 2) Does G-CSF allow maintenance of the chemotherapy dose with the goal of improving survival?

Objective: To evaluate the evidence for the role of G-CSF in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer.

Outcomes: Clinical outcomes reflecting events that may affect quality of life and/or resource utilization (e.g., rates and duration of hospitalization, antibiotic use); outcomes reflecting the effect of treatment on infection rates, tumour response and survival and those related to the biological effect of G-CSF.

Perspective (values): Evidence was selected, reviewed and synthesized by members of the Provincial Systemic Treatment Disease Site Group (DSG) of the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative. Drafts of this document have been circulated and reviewed by members of the Systemic Treatment DSG. The DSG comprises medical oncologists, pharmacists, supportive care personnel and administrators. Evaluation by clinicians was considered in the final practice guideline. Community representatives did not participate in the development of this report but will in future reports. Guidelines approval does require participation by community representatives.

Quality of evidence: Two published guidelines and an update of one guideline were identified. Ten eligible randomized controlled trials published in English were included.

Benefits: A meta-analysis of data from 8 trials showed that the odds of experiencing febrile neutropenia with G-CSF were significantly reduced (odds ratio 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27 to 0.52; p < 0.00001). G-CSF reduced the risk of febrile neutropenia by 34% (risk ratio 0.66; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.86; p = 0.0015). The use of G-CSF was associated with a significant reduction in antibiotic usage and days spent in hospital in 2 trials and had no effect in the other 4 in which it was measured. Five trials reported no difference in overall median survival, with 2 small trials detecting a significant increase related to G-CSF. However, further research is necessary to confirm these results.

Harms: The toxic effects of G-CSF are relatively mild. The most consistent clinical symptom attributed to G-CSF is bone pain, reported in incidence rates ranging from 20% to 50% in 3 trials. Except for one case, reported bone pain was mild.

Practice guideline: In cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) may be beneficial for some patients. If a reduction in the number of febrile neutropenic episodes, or in the duration of such episodes, is expected to improve quality of life, then G-CSF is a reasonable treatment option for selected patients. A clear justification for the use of G-CSF should be stated. If the objective of using G-CSF is to maintain dose intensity of antitumour agents, then G-CSF can be recommended where reduction in dose intensity has been shown in randomized controlled trials to reduce survival or disease-free survival. Although the evidence is weaker, the Systemic Treatment DSG would support the practice endorsed by other guidelines (American Society of Clinical Oncology, Ontario Drug Benefit Plan) and would recommend G-CSF for patients receiving potentially curative chemotherapy: i) as primary prophylaxis; that is, where dose reductions below a specified level are required because of a known high risk of febrile neutropenia, or ii) as secondary prophylaxis in patients receiving chemotherapy of established efficacy who have suffered a prior serious episode of febrile neutropenia due to the same chemotherapy regimen. The exact cut-off for dose reductions is unknown at this time and ought to be left to the judgement of the clinician. In general, the use of G-CSF for dose reductions lower than 20% is not recommended. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信