{"title":"表柔比星单独或联合化疗治疗转移性乳腺癌。省乳腺癌病区组和省全身治疗病区组。","authors":"B P Findlay, C Walker-Dilks","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Guideline question: </strong>How effective is epirubicin compared with doxorubicin in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer?</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To make recommendations about the use of epirubicin, particularly compared with doxorubicin, in women with metastatic breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Outcomes of interest are response rate, survival and toxicity.</p><p><strong>Perspective (values): </strong>Evidence was reviewed and summarized by a member of the Provincial Systemic Treatment Disease Site Group (DSG) of the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative. Drafts of the practice guideline were reviewed and discussed by the Breast Cancer DSG of the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative. The 2 DSGs comprise medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, surgeons, epidemiologists, pathologists, nurses, pharmacists, a medical sociologist and a community representative.</p><p><strong>Quality of evidence: </strong>Thirteen randomized controlled trials (11 published reports and 2 reports in abstract form) were reviewed that compared epirubicin and doxorubicin at equal doses, epirubicin at a higher dose than that of doxorubicin, and epirubicin at escalating doses.</p><p><strong>Benefits: </strong>No significant differences were observed in response rate or median survival in the 7 trials comparing equal doses of epirubicin and doxorubicin or in the 3 trials comparing epirubicin at a higher dose than that of doxorubicin. An increased response rate was observed with higher doses of epirubicin in the 3 trials that compared escalating doses; no difference in survival was observed.</p><p><strong>Harms: </strong>Compared with doxorubicin, epirubicin was associated with less nausea and vomiting (risk ratio [RR] 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63 to 0.92; p = 0.0048), less neutropenia (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.78; p = 0.0017) and less cardiotoxicity (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.77; p = 0.0044), including a trend toward fewer episodes of congestive heart failure (RR 0.38; 95% CI 0.14 to 1.04; p = 0.059).</p><p><strong>Practice guideline: </strong>For the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in which the goal of treatment is palliation, epirubicin (at doses equivalent to doxorubicin) has been shown to be equally efficacious and less toxic than doxorubicin. Doxorubicin, however, is an acceptable alternative. CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE DATE: Oct. 2, 1997.</p>","PeriodicalId":79570,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC","volume":"2 3","pages":"140-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epirubicin, alone or in combination chemotherapy, for metastatic breast cancer. Provincial Breast Cancer Disease Site Group and the Provincial Systemic Treatment Disease Site Group.\",\"authors\":\"B P Findlay, C Walker-Dilks\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Guideline question: </strong>How effective is epirubicin compared with doxorubicin in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer?</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To make recommendations about the use of epirubicin, particularly compared with doxorubicin, in women with metastatic breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Outcomes of interest are response rate, survival and toxicity.</p><p><strong>Perspective (values): </strong>Evidence was reviewed and summarized by a member of the Provincial Systemic Treatment Disease Site Group (DSG) of the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative. Drafts of the practice guideline were reviewed and discussed by the Breast Cancer DSG of the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative. The 2 DSGs comprise medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, surgeons, epidemiologists, pathologists, nurses, pharmacists, a medical sociologist and a community representative.</p><p><strong>Quality of evidence: </strong>Thirteen randomized controlled trials (11 published reports and 2 reports in abstract form) were reviewed that compared epirubicin and doxorubicin at equal doses, epirubicin at a higher dose than that of doxorubicin, and epirubicin at escalating doses.</p><p><strong>Benefits: </strong>No significant differences were observed in response rate or median survival in the 7 trials comparing equal doses of epirubicin and doxorubicin or in the 3 trials comparing epirubicin at a higher dose than that of doxorubicin. An increased response rate was observed with higher doses of epirubicin in the 3 trials that compared escalating doses; no difference in survival was observed.</p><p><strong>Harms: </strong>Compared with doxorubicin, epirubicin was associated with less nausea and vomiting (risk ratio [RR] 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63 to 0.92; p = 0.0048), less neutropenia (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.78; p = 0.0017) and less cardiotoxicity (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.77; p = 0.0044), including a trend toward fewer episodes of congestive heart failure (RR 0.38; 95% CI 0.14 to 1.04; p = 0.059).</p><p><strong>Practice guideline: </strong>For the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in which the goal of treatment is palliation, epirubicin (at doses equivalent to doxorubicin) has been shown to be equally efficacious and less toxic than doxorubicin. Doxorubicin, however, is an acceptable alternative. CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE DATE: Oct. 2, 1997.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"140-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
指南问题:表柔比星与阿霉素相比,治疗转移性乳腺癌的效果如何?目的:对转移性乳腺癌患者使用表柔比星提出建议,特别是与阿霉素比较。结果:关注的结果是反应率、生存和毒性。观点(价值):证据是由安大略省癌症护理实践指南倡议的省级系统性治疗疾病现场组(DSG)的一名成员审查和总结的。实践指南的草案由安大略省癌症护理实践指南倡议的乳腺癌DSG进行了审查和讨论。这2个小组由肿瘤学家、放射肿瘤学家、外科医生、流行病学家、病理学家、护士、药剂师、医学社会学家和一名社区代表组成。证据质量:我们回顾了13项随机对照试验(11项已发表报告和2项摘要报告),比较了表柔比星和阿霉素等剂量、表柔比星高于阿柔比星的剂量以及表柔比星不断增加的剂量。益处:在7项比较等剂量表柔比星和阿霉素的试验中,在3项比较表柔比星高于阿霉素剂量的试验中,没有观察到应答率或中位生存期的显著差异。在比较逐渐增加的剂量的3个试验中,观察到高剂量的表阿霉素增加了反应率;生存率无差异。危害:与阿霉素相比,表柔比星的恶心呕吐发生率较低(危险比[RR] 0.76;95%置信区间[CI] 0.63 ~ 0.92;p = 0.0048),中性粒细胞减少症较少(RR 0.52;95% CI 0.35 ~ 0.78;p = 0.0017)和较少的心脏毒性(RR 0.43;95% CI 0.24 ~ 0.77;p = 0.0044),包括充血性心力衰竭发作次数减少的趋势(RR 0.38;95% CI 0.14 ~ 1.04;P = 0.059)。实践指南:对于以缓解治疗为目标的转移性乳腺癌的治疗,表柔比星(剂量相当于阿霉素)已被证明与阿霉素同样有效且毒性更小。然而,阿霉素是一种可接受的替代品。临床实践指南日期:1997年10月2日。
Epirubicin, alone or in combination chemotherapy, for metastatic breast cancer. Provincial Breast Cancer Disease Site Group and the Provincial Systemic Treatment Disease Site Group.
Guideline question: How effective is epirubicin compared with doxorubicin in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer?
Objective: To make recommendations about the use of epirubicin, particularly compared with doxorubicin, in women with metastatic breast cancer.
Outcomes: Outcomes of interest are response rate, survival and toxicity.
Perspective (values): Evidence was reviewed and summarized by a member of the Provincial Systemic Treatment Disease Site Group (DSG) of the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative. Drafts of the practice guideline were reviewed and discussed by the Breast Cancer DSG of the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative. The 2 DSGs comprise medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, surgeons, epidemiologists, pathologists, nurses, pharmacists, a medical sociologist and a community representative.
Quality of evidence: Thirteen randomized controlled trials (11 published reports and 2 reports in abstract form) were reviewed that compared epirubicin and doxorubicin at equal doses, epirubicin at a higher dose than that of doxorubicin, and epirubicin at escalating doses.
Benefits: No significant differences were observed in response rate or median survival in the 7 trials comparing equal doses of epirubicin and doxorubicin or in the 3 trials comparing epirubicin at a higher dose than that of doxorubicin. An increased response rate was observed with higher doses of epirubicin in the 3 trials that compared escalating doses; no difference in survival was observed.
Harms: Compared with doxorubicin, epirubicin was associated with less nausea and vomiting (risk ratio [RR] 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63 to 0.92; p = 0.0048), less neutropenia (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.78; p = 0.0017) and less cardiotoxicity (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.77; p = 0.0044), including a trend toward fewer episodes of congestive heart failure (RR 0.38; 95% CI 0.14 to 1.04; p = 0.059).
Practice guideline: For the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in which the goal of treatment is palliation, epirubicin (at doses equivalent to doxorubicin) has been shown to be equally efficacious and less toxic than doxorubicin. Doxorubicin, however, is an acceptable alternative. CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE DATE: Oct. 2, 1997.