放射外科:海绵窦脑膜瘤的有效治疗方法?

Ziyal, Sekhar, Salas
{"title":"放射外科:海绵窦脑膜瘤的有效治疗方法?","authors":"Ziyal,&nbsp;Sekhar,&nbsp;Salas","doi":"10.1007/s003290050117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Meningiomas involving the cavernous sinus present the neurosurgeon with different choices: observation, microsurgery, or radiosurgery. During the last decade, advances in microsurgical techniques have significantly lowered the treatment-related morbidity, and some neurosurgeons have reported long-term follow-up results. Recently, several radiosurgical series have reported excellent tumor control and good functional preservation for tumors in this area. Most of these series do not provide complete information about the patient's cranial nerve function, and objective and subjective outcome data. The follow-up provided has also been short, considering that meningiomas have a tendency to recur or regrow up to 20 years postoperatively. There is also the concern about those patients who fail radiosurgical treatment, since microsurgery does not yield good results in such cases. In this paper, several radiosurgical series are critically reviewed, with a discussion about the pros and cons of microsurgery versus radiosurgery. The authors suggest that a uniform reporting strategy be adopted by all surgeons treating tumors of this area, which will allow comparative studies to be conducted. Additionally, we suggest a treatment algorithm for cavernous sinus meningiomas, based on the patients age, occupation and preference, preoperative binocular function, and curability of the tumor.</p>","PeriodicalId":79482,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in neurosurgery : CR","volume":"9 2","pages":"107-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s003290050117","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiosurgery: an effective treatment for cavernous sinus meningiomas?\",\"authors\":\"Ziyal,&nbsp;Sekhar,&nbsp;Salas\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s003290050117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Meningiomas involving the cavernous sinus present the neurosurgeon with different choices: observation, microsurgery, or radiosurgery. During the last decade, advances in microsurgical techniques have significantly lowered the treatment-related morbidity, and some neurosurgeons have reported long-term follow-up results. Recently, several radiosurgical series have reported excellent tumor control and good functional preservation for tumors in this area. Most of these series do not provide complete information about the patient's cranial nerve function, and objective and subjective outcome data. The follow-up provided has also been short, considering that meningiomas have a tendency to recur or regrow up to 20 years postoperatively. There is also the concern about those patients who fail radiosurgical treatment, since microsurgery does not yield good results in such cases. In this paper, several radiosurgical series are critically reviewed, with a discussion about the pros and cons of microsurgery versus radiosurgery. The authors suggest that a uniform reporting strategy be adopted by all surgeons treating tumors of this area, which will allow comparative studies to be conducted. Additionally, we suggest a treatment algorithm for cavernous sinus meningiomas, based on the patients age, occupation and preference, preoperative binocular function, and curability of the tumor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical reviews in neurosurgery : CR\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"107-115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s003290050117\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical reviews in neurosurgery : CR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s003290050117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in neurosurgery : CR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s003290050117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

累及海绵窦的脑膜瘤给神经外科医生提供了不同的选择:观察、显微手术或放射手术。在过去的十年中,显微外科技术的进步显著降低了治疗相关的发病率,一些神经外科医生已经报告了长期随访结果。最近,一些放射外科系列报道了该区域肿瘤的良好控制和功能保存。这些系列大多不能提供患者脑神经功能的完整信息,以及客观和主观结果数据。考虑到脑膜瘤在术后20年内有复发或再生的趋势,随访时间也很短。对于那些放射手术治疗失败的患者,也存在担忧,因为显微手术在这种情况下并不能产生良好的效果。本文回顾了几种放射外科系列,并讨论了显微外科与放射外科的优缺点。作者建议所有治疗该区域肿瘤的外科医生采用统一的报告策略,这将允许进行比较研究。此外,我们根据患者的年龄、职业和偏好、术前双眼功能和肿瘤的治愈率,提出一种海绵窦脑膜瘤的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radiosurgery: an effective treatment for cavernous sinus meningiomas?

Meningiomas involving the cavernous sinus present the neurosurgeon with different choices: observation, microsurgery, or radiosurgery. During the last decade, advances in microsurgical techniques have significantly lowered the treatment-related morbidity, and some neurosurgeons have reported long-term follow-up results. Recently, several radiosurgical series have reported excellent tumor control and good functional preservation for tumors in this area. Most of these series do not provide complete information about the patient's cranial nerve function, and objective and subjective outcome data. The follow-up provided has also been short, considering that meningiomas have a tendency to recur or regrow up to 20 years postoperatively. There is also the concern about those patients who fail radiosurgical treatment, since microsurgery does not yield good results in such cases. In this paper, several radiosurgical series are critically reviewed, with a discussion about the pros and cons of microsurgery versus radiosurgery. The authors suggest that a uniform reporting strategy be adopted by all surgeons treating tumors of this area, which will allow comparative studies to be conducted. Additionally, we suggest a treatment algorithm for cavernous sinus meningiomas, based on the patients age, occupation and preference, preoperative binocular function, and curability of the tumor.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信