新生儿期表面活性剂对早产儿呼吸力学的影响。

S Parmigiani, C Panza, G Bevilacqua
{"title":"新生儿期表面活性剂对早产儿呼吸力学的影响。","authors":"S Parmigiani,&nbsp;C Panza,&nbsp;G Bevilacqua","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the development of the lung of preterm infants given exogenous surfactant in the neonatal period versus control babies through the evolution of respiratory mechanics (RM) parameters.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of babies < or = 30 weeks' gestation admitted to our intensive care unit in the period 1990-94 in which RM parameters had been followed for the first two years of life. Babies were divided into two groups depending on the fact that they received endotracheal porcine surfactant 200 mg/kg for prophylaxis or rescue treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) (treatment group, No.37) or not (control group, No.41). Evaluation of RM were performed by means of PèDS at the post-conceptual age of 38-42 wks and/or 3-6 mth and/or 9-12 mth and/or 18-24 mth in spontaneous breathing after sedation with chloral hydrate and positioning of an oesophageal balloon. Chronic lung disease (CLD) was defined a posteriori as presence of polypnea at discharge independently from oxygen-therapy and from radiological findings, including also the most severe forms of bronchopulmonary dysplasia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The treatment and control group did not differ for birth weight and gestational age (1060 +/- 293 vs 1189 +/- 321 g. and 28.1 vs 28.3 +/- 1.5 wks respectively), however the babies of the treatment group had higher incidence of RDS, mechanical ventilation, nasal continuous positive airway pressure, and use of caffeine (p < 0.01 vs the control group). No difference was found in the incidence of CLD at discharge between the two groups. No difference was found between the treatment and the control group at the various times of the examinations concerning respiratory frequency, tidal volume, minute ventilation, dynamic compliance of the respiratory system (indexed both to body weight and length), and respiratory system resistances. The above cited parameters, except respiratory system resistances, showed significant changes from the first to the last evaluation (p < 0.01) in both groups, indicating a continuous improvement of the RM properties of the lung in the first two years of life. As regards respiratory system resistances, these were significantly reduced in the first two years of life in the treatment group (from 73.9 +/- 38.5 to 31.3 +/- 5.8 cmH2O/L/sec; p < 0.05), while there was no significant improvement in the control group (from 65.1 +/- 26.1 to 42.8 +/- 41.6 cmH2O/L/sec; p = ns).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of surfactant both as prophylactic and rescue treatment of RDS seems able to guarantee the lung of the preterm infant to develop in a regular way, in spite of high incidence of respiratory diseases and unfavourable effects of respiratory therapies. This study also allows to have standard reference values of RM parameters for ex-preterm infants in the first two years of life to evaluate their lung development.</p>","PeriodicalId":6943,"journal":{"name":"Acta bio-medica de L'Ateneo parmense : organo della Societa di medicina e scienze naturali di Parma","volume":"68 Suppl 1 ","pages":"65-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolution of respiratory mechanics in preterm babies after surfactant administration in the neonatal period.\",\"authors\":\"S Parmigiani,&nbsp;C Panza,&nbsp;G Bevilacqua\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the development of the lung of preterm infants given exogenous surfactant in the neonatal period versus control babies through the evolution of respiratory mechanics (RM) parameters.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of babies < or = 30 weeks' gestation admitted to our intensive care unit in the period 1990-94 in which RM parameters had been followed for the first two years of life. Babies were divided into two groups depending on the fact that they received endotracheal porcine surfactant 200 mg/kg for prophylaxis or rescue treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) (treatment group, No.37) or not (control group, No.41). Evaluation of RM were performed by means of PèDS at the post-conceptual age of 38-42 wks and/or 3-6 mth and/or 9-12 mth and/or 18-24 mth in spontaneous breathing after sedation with chloral hydrate and positioning of an oesophageal balloon. Chronic lung disease (CLD) was defined a posteriori as presence of polypnea at discharge independently from oxygen-therapy and from radiological findings, including also the most severe forms of bronchopulmonary dysplasia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The treatment and control group did not differ for birth weight and gestational age (1060 +/- 293 vs 1189 +/- 321 g. and 28.1 vs 28.3 +/- 1.5 wks respectively), however the babies of the treatment group had higher incidence of RDS, mechanical ventilation, nasal continuous positive airway pressure, and use of caffeine (p < 0.01 vs the control group). No difference was found in the incidence of CLD at discharge between the two groups. No difference was found between the treatment and the control group at the various times of the examinations concerning respiratory frequency, tidal volume, minute ventilation, dynamic compliance of the respiratory system (indexed both to body weight and length), and respiratory system resistances. The above cited parameters, except respiratory system resistances, showed significant changes from the first to the last evaluation (p < 0.01) in both groups, indicating a continuous improvement of the RM properties of the lung in the first two years of life. As regards respiratory system resistances, these were significantly reduced in the first two years of life in the treatment group (from 73.9 +/- 38.5 to 31.3 +/- 5.8 cmH2O/L/sec; p < 0.05), while there was no significant improvement in the control group (from 65.1 +/- 26.1 to 42.8 +/- 41.6 cmH2O/L/sec; p = ns).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of surfactant both as prophylactic and rescue treatment of RDS seems able to guarantee the lung of the preterm infant to develop in a regular way, in spite of high incidence of respiratory diseases and unfavourable effects of respiratory therapies. This study also allows to have standard reference values of RM parameters for ex-preterm infants in the first two years of life to evaluate their lung development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta bio-medica de L'Ateneo parmense : organo della Societa di medicina e scienze naturali di Parma\",\"volume\":\"68 Suppl 1 \",\"pages\":\"65-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta bio-medica de L'Ateneo parmense : organo della Societa di medicina e scienze naturali di Parma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta bio-medica de L'Ateneo parmense : organo della Societa di medicina e scienze naturali di Parma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过呼吸力学(RM)参数的演化,评价新生儿期外源性表面活性剂对早产儿肺发育的影响。患者和方法:回顾性分析1990- 1994年期间入住我们重症监护室的<或= 30孕周的婴儿,其中在生命的头两年遵循RM参数。根据是否接受气管内猪表面活性剂200mg /kg预防或抢救呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)治疗(治疗组,编号37)和未接受气管内猪表面活性剂预防或抢救治疗(对照组,编号41)将患儿分为两组。经水合氯醛镇静和食管球囊定位后,孕后年龄38-42周和/或3-6个月和/或9-12个月和/或18-24个月自主呼吸时,通过ppts评估RM。慢性肺部疾病(CLD)被定义为出院时出现呼吸急促,独立于氧疗和放射学表现,包括最严重的支气管肺发育不良。结果:治疗组与对照组出生体重、胎龄差异无统计学意义(1060 +/- 293 g vs 1189 +/- 321 g, 28.1 +/- 1.5周),但治疗组婴儿RDS、机械通气、鼻持续气道正压、咖啡因使用发生率高于对照组(p < 0.01)。两组患者出院时CLD发生率无差异。在呼吸频率、潮气量、分钟通气量、呼吸系统动态顺应性(以体重和体长为指标)和呼吸系统阻力的不同检查时间,治疗组和对照组之间没有差异。上述参数除呼吸系统阻力外,两组在第一次和最后一次评估时均有显著变化(p < 0.01),说明肺的RM特性在生命的前两年持续改善。在呼吸系统阻力方面,治疗组在生命的头两年显著降低(从73.9 +/- 38.5降至31.3 +/- 5.8 cmH2O/L/sec;p < 0.05),而对照组无显著改善(从65.1 +/- 26.1 cmH2O/L/sec降至42.8 +/- 41.6 cmH2O/L/sec;P = ns)。结论:尽管呼吸道疾病发病率高,呼吸治疗效果不佳,但表面活性剂作为RDS的预防和抢救治疗似乎可以保证早产儿肺部的正常发育。本研究也允许有标准的参考值RM参数的前早产儿在生命的头两年,以评估其肺发育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evolution of respiratory mechanics in preterm babies after surfactant administration in the neonatal period.

Objective: To evaluate the development of the lung of preterm infants given exogenous surfactant in the neonatal period versus control babies through the evolution of respiratory mechanics (RM) parameters.

Patients and methods: Retrospective analysis of babies < or = 30 weeks' gestation admitted to our intensive care unit in the period 1990-94 in which RM parameters had been followed for the first two years of life. Babies were divided into two groups depending on the fact that they received endotracheal porcine surfactant 200 mg/kg for prophylaxis or rescue treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) (treatment group, No.37) or not (control group, No.41). Evaluation of RM were performed by means of PèDS at the post-conceptual age of 38-42 wks and/or 3-6 mth and/or 9-12 mth and/or 18-24 mth in spontaneous breathing after sedation with chloral hydrate and positioning of an oesophageal balloon. Chronic lung disease (CLD) was defined a posteriori as presence of polypnea at discharge independently from oxygen-therapy and from radiological findings, including also the most severe forms of bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Results: The treatment and control group did not differ for birth weight and gestational age (1060 +/- 293 vs 1189 +/- 321 g. and 28.1 vs 28.3 +/- 1.5 wks respectively), however the babies of the treatment group had higher incidence of RDS, mechanical ventilation, nasal continuous positive airway pressure, and use of caffeine (p < 0.01 vs the control group). No difference was found in the incidence of CLD at discharge between the two groups. No difference was found between the treatment and the control group at the various times of the examinations concerning respiratory frequency, tidal volume, minute ventilation, dynamic compliance of the respiratory system (indexed both to body weight and length), and respiratory system resistances. The above cited parameters, except respiratory system resistances, showed significant changes from the first to the last evaluation (p < 0.01) in both groups, indicating a continuous improvement of the RM properties of the lung in the first two years of life. As regards respiratory system resistances, these were significantly reduced in the first two years of life in the treatment group (from 73.9 +/- 38.5 to 31.3 +/- 5.8 cmH2O/L/sec; p < 0.05), while there was no significant improvement in the control group (from 65.1 +/- 26.1 to 42.8 +/- 41.6 cmH2O/L/sec; p = ns).

Conclusion: The use of surfactant both as prophylactic and rescue treatment of RDS seems able to guarantee the lung of the preterm infant to develop in a regular way, in spite of high incidence of respiratory diseases and unfavourable effects of respiratory therapies. This study also allows to have standard reference values of RM parameters for ex-preterm infants in the first two years of life to evaluate their lung development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信