护理研究会议:受益还是负担。

D A Clickner, M A Martin, M Newton, D H Yablon
{"title":"护理研究会议:受益还是负担。","authors":"D A Clickner,&nbsp;M A Martin,&nbsp;M Newton,&nbsp;D H Yablon","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The benefits for presenters and participants of three annual nursing research conferences were investigated. Results from 133 on-site program evaluations were compared to results of surveys developed to capture presenter and participant perspectives, 6-22 months post conference. Data from surveys revealed that descriptive exploratory studies (the majority of presentations) were evaluated as least useful. One third of participants reported that they attempted to apply research findings or clinical innovations to their area of practice. A unique finding of this study was that presenters experience post-conference benefits, such as publishing, consulting, presenting, and project expansion. The results of the post conference evaluations differed from the surveys some months after the conferences. Planners of continuing education programs are cautioned against future conference development based solely on the initial \"glow\" of on-site program evaluations. Study findings clearly suggest that the benefits of nursing research conferences to both participants and presenters far outweigh the burdens.</p>","PeriodicalId":76678,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the New York State Nurses' Association","volume":"29 1","pages":"9-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nursing research conferences: benefit or burden.\",\"authors\":\"D A Clickner,&nbsp;M A Martin,&nbsp;M Newton,&nbsp;D H Yablon\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The benefits for presenters and participants of three annual nursing research conferences were investigated. Results from 133 on-site program evaluations were compared to results of surveys developed to capture presenter and participant perspectives, 6-22 months post conference. Data from surveys revealed that descriptive exploratory studies (the majority of presentations) were evaluated as least useful. One third of participants reported that they attempted to apply research findings or clinical innovations to their area of practice. A unique finding of this study was that presenters experience post-conference benefits, such as publishing, consulting, presenting, and project expansion. The results of the post conference evaluations differed from the surveys some months after the conferences. Planners of continuing education programs are cautioned against future conference development based solely on the initial \\\"glow\\\" of on-site program evaluations. Study findings clearly suggest that the benefits of nursing research conferences to both participants and presenters far outweigh the burdens.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the New York State Nurses' Association\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"9-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the New York State Nurses' Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the New York State Nurses' Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

调查了三次年度护理研究会议的演讲者和参与者的利益。会议结束后6-22个月,对133项现场项目评估的结果进行了比较,这些调查是为了捕捉主持人和参与者的观点而进行的。来自调查的数据显示,描述性探索性研究(大多数报告)被认为是最没用的。三分之一的参与者报告说,他们试图将研究成果或临床创新应用到他们的实践领域。这项研究的一个独特发现是,演讲者经历了会议后的好处,如出版、咨询、演讲和项目扩展。会议后评价的结果与会议后几个月的调查结果不同。继续教育项目的策划者们被告诫不要仅仅根据现场项目评估的最初“光芒”来发展未来的会议。研究结果清楚地表明,护理研究会议对参与者和演讲者的好处远远大于负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nursing research conferences: benefit or burden.

The benefits for presenters and participants of three annual nursing research conferences were investigated. Results from 133 on-site program evaluations were compared to results of surveys developed to capture presenter and participant perspectives, 6-22 months post conference. Data from surveys revealed that descriptive exploratory studies (the majority of presentations) were evaluated as least useful. One third of participants reported that they attempted to apply research findings or clinical innovations to their area of practice. A unique finding of this study was that presenters experience post-conference benefits, such as publishing, consulting, presenting, and project expansion. The results of the post conference evaluations differed from the surveys some months after the conferences. Planners of continuing education programs are cautioned against future conference development based solely on the initial "glow" of on-site program evaluations. Study findings clearly suggest that the benefits of nursing research conferences to both participants and presenters far outweigh the burdens.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信