提高多中心纵向研究内部效度的策略。

C S Smith, J Salyer, N Geddes, B A Mark
{"title":"提高多中心纵向研究内部效度的策略。","authors":"C S Smith,&nbsp;J Salyer,&nbsp;N Geddes,&nbsp;B A Mark","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lack of standardized data collection procedures in multi-center longitudinal research poses potential threats to the internal validity of the study. This article addresses several key issues in data collection that can affect the results of longitudinal research. The authors describe these issues in relation to the study currently in progress and cite specific strategies used during data collection to reduce or eliminate data collection inconsistencies. Use of these strategies is not limited to longitudinal, nonexperimental causal models. Outcomes managers and clinical nursing researchers may find some of the strategies useful to enhance the internal consistency of experimental and nonexperimental cross-sectional research.</p>","PeriodicalId":79526,"journal":{"name":"Outcomes management for nursing practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies to enhance internal validity in multi-center longitudinal research.\",\"authors\":\"C S Smith,&nbsp;J Salyer,&nbsp;N Geddes,&nbsp;B A Mark\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lack of standardized data collection procedures in multi-center longitudinal research poses potential threats to the internal validity of the study. This article addresses several key issues in data collection that can affect the results of longitudinal research. The authors describe these issues in relation to the study currently in progress and cite specific strategies used during data collection to reduce or eliminate data collection inconsistencies. Use of these strategies is not limited to longitudinal, nonexperimental causal models. Outcomes managers and clinical nursing researchers may find some of the strategies useful to enhance the internal consistency of experimental and nonexperimental cross-sectional research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Outcomes management for nursing practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Outcomes management for nursing practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Outcomes management for nursing practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多中心纵向研究缺乏标准化的数据收集程序,对研究的内部有效性构成潜在威胁。本文讨论了数据收集中可能影响纵向研究结果的几个关键问题。作者描述了与目前正在进行的研究相关的这些问题,并引用了在数据收集过程中使用的具体策略,以减少或消除数据收集的不一致性。这些策略的使用并不局限于纵向的、非实验性的因果模型。结果管理人员和临床护理研究人员可能会发现一些策略有助于增强实验和非实验横断面研究的内部一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategies to enhance internal validity in multi-center longitudinal research.

Lack of standardized data collection procedures in multi-center longitudinal research poses potential threats to the internal validity of the study. This article addresses several key issues in data collection that can affect the results of longitudinal research. The authors describe these issues in relation to the study currently in progress and cite specific strategies used during data collection to reduce or eliminate data collection inconsistencies. Use of these strategies is not limited to longitudinal, nonexperimental causal models. Outcomes managers and clinical nursing researchers may find some of the strategies useful to enhance the internal consistency of experimental and nonexperimental cross-sectional research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信