在生物闪能看到安慰剂效应

Q Medicine
Schönbächler
{"title":"在生物闪能看到安慰剂效应","authors":"Schönbächler","doi":"10.1159/000021070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Placebo from a Biosemiotic Point of View The rise and success of modern science, first in physics, later in medicine, was based on a mechanic linear model of causality. Its only category of explanation of natural processes is the mechanical machine. As human beings using and processing signs we cannot recognize ourselves in this reductionistic model. As all living creatures we perceive, interpret and answer the stimuli of the environment. To explain the behaviour of organisms we need a semiotic-circular causality. Semiotics, the study of signs, can be subdivided in semantics, the theory of meaning of signs, in syntax, the theory of the forms and the arrangement of signs, and in pragmatics, the theory of the contextual rules of communication. Semiotics is not exclusively concerned with language, but helps as so-called biosemiotics also to explain the network of communication of a living organism. The 'Denkstil' of established pharmacology is likewise restricted to mechanistic causality. One of the consequences is the fact that theplacebo effect is defined as 'non-specific' or 'non-characteristic'. Such negative definitions exclude concrete questions of investigation. We have to accept a biosemiotic view in pharmacology, to see drugs as signs consisting of a physical vehicle equipped with meaning. The therapy with drugs must be seen in a broader treatment context investigated by pharmacopragmatics. The semiotic expansion of pharmacology does not invalidate the achievements of classic pharmacology, but elucidates in addition a view of the pragmatic components and makes the scientific integration of the placebophenomenon into drug therapy possible. The placebo effect loses its inconsistency.</p>","PeriodicalId":54318,"journal":{"name":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin","volume":"5 Suppl S1 ","pages":"18-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000021070","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Der Placebo-Effekt in biosemiotischer Sicht.\",\"authors\":\"Schönbächler\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000021070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Placebo from a Biosemiotic Point of View The rise and success of modern science, first in physics, later in medicine, was based on a mechanic linear model of causality. Its only category of explanation of natural processes is the mechanical machine. As human beings using and processing signs we cannot recognize ourselves in this reductionistic model. As all living creatures we perceive, interpret and answer the stimuli of the environment. To explain the behaviour of organisms we need a semiotic-circular causality. Semiotics, the study of signs, can be subdivided in semantics, the theory of meaning of signs, in syntax, the theory of the forms and the arrangement of signs, and in pragmatics, the theory of the contextual rules of communication. Semiotics is not exclusively concerned with language, but helps as so-called biosemiotics also to explain the network of communication of a living organism. The 'Denkstil' of established pharmacology is likewise restricted to mechanistic causality. One of the consequences is the fact that theplacebo effect is defined as 'non-specific' or 'non-characteristic'. Such negative definitions exclude concrete questions of investigation. We have to accept a biosemiotic view in pharmacology, to see drugs as signs consisting of a physical vehicle equipped with meaning. The therapy with drugs must be seen in a broader treatment context investigated by pharmacopragmatics. The semiotic expansion of pharmacology does not invalidate the achievements of classic pharmacology, but elucidates in addition a view of the pragmatic components and makes the scientific integration of the placebophenomenon into drug therapy possible. The placebo effect loses its inconsistency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forschende Komplementarmedizin\",\"volume\":\"5 Suppl S1 \",\"pages\":\"18-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000021070\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forschende Komplementarmedizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000021070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000021070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

从生物符号学的角度看安慰剂现代科学的兴起和成功,首先是物理学,后来是医学,是建立在因果关系的机械线性模型基础上的。它解释自然过程的唯一范畴是机械机器。作为使用和处理符号的人类,我们不能在这种简化模型中认识自己。就像所有的生物一样,我们感知、解释和回答环境的刺激。为了解释生物体的行为,我们需要一个符号循环因果关系。符号学是对符号的研究,它可以细分为语义学(符号意义理论)、语法学(符号形式和排列理论)和语用学(交际语境规则理论)。符号学不仅与语言有关,而且作为所谓的生物符号学也有助于解释活生物体的交流网络。既定药理学的“Denkstil”同样局限于机械性的因果关系。结果之一就是安慰剂效应被定义为“非特异性”或“非特征性”。这种否定的定义排除了具体的调查问题。我们必须接受药理学中的生物符号学观点,把药物看作是由具有意义的物理载体组成的符号。药物治疗必须在更广泛的治疗背景下被药效学研究。药理学的符号学扩展并没有使经典药理学的成就无效,而是阐明了一种实用成分的观点,并使安慰剂现象科学地融入药物治疗成为可能。安慰剂效应失去了它的不一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Der Placebo-Effekt in biosemiotischer Sicht.

Placebo from a Biosemiotic Point of View The rise and success of modern science, first in physics, later in medicine, was based on a mechanic linear model of causality. Its only category of explanation of natural processes is the mechanical machine. As human beings using and processing signs we cannot recognize ourselves in this reductionistic model. As all living creatures we perceive, interpret and answer the stimuli of the environment. To explain the behaviour of organisms we need a semiotic-circular causality. Semiotics, the study of signs, can be subdivided in semantics, the theory of meaning of signs, in syntax, the theory of the forms and the arrangement of signs, and in pragmatics, the theory of the contextual rules of communication. Semiotics is not exclusively concerned with language, but helps as so-called biosemiotics also to explain the network of communication of a living organism. The 'Denkstil' of established pharmacology is likewise restricted to mechanistic causality. One of the consequences is the fact that theplacebo effect is defined as 'non-specific' or 'non-characteristic'. Such negative definitions exclude concrete questions of investigation. We have to accept a biosemiotic view in pharmacology, to see drugs as signs consisting of a physical vehicle equipped with meaning. The therapy with drugs must be seen in a broader treatment context investigated by pharmacopragmatics. The semiotic expansion of pharmacology does not invalidate the achievements of classic pharmacology, but elucidates in addition a view of the pragmatic components and makes the scientific integration of the placebophenomenon into drug therapy possible. The placebo effect loses its inconsistency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信