筛选化学厕所污泥中排放的非法有毒物质。

P Y Robidoux, J López-Gastey, A Choucri, G I Sunahara
{"title":"筛选化学厕所污泥中排放的非法有毒物质。","authors":"P Y Robidoux,&nbsp;J López-Gastey,&nbsp;A Choucri,&nbsp;G I Sunahara","doi":"10.1080/105294198277942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article presents an integrative approach, using toxicological and chemical analyses, to screen for toxic substances that could be illegally added to the chemical-toilet sludge received at the wastewater treatment plant of the Montreal urban community. Four toxicity tests (Microtox, bacterial-respiration, root-elongation, and seed-germination tests) were used to establish the toxicity range of a \"normal\" sludge and the determination of threshold limits criteria. Chemical-toilet sludge samples were spiked with two types and amounts of contaminants (zinc, phenol). Conservative criteria were used to detect abnormal toxicity with great reliability and avoid false positives (i.e., detecting abnormal toxicity in nonspiked sludge). Taken individually, the seed-germination test was the least discriminating toxicological method (detecting only 10% of the spiked samples); the bacterial-respiration test was relatively better (detecting 72% of the spiked samples). Using a limited battery of two toxicity tests (Microtox and respiration test), the identification of contaminated chemical-toilet sludge can be detected with good efficiency and possibly great reliability (more than 80% of the spiked samples). This proposed procedure is efficient, easy to apply, cost-effective, and very fast (an abnormal toxicity level can be determined within a few hours).</p>","PeriodicalId":77339,"journal":{"name":"Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)","volume":"6 1","pages":"23-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/105294198277942","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening of illicit toxic substances discharged in chemical toilet sludge.\",\"authors\":\"P Y Robidoux,&nbsp;J López-Gastey,&nbsp;A Choucri,&nbsp;G I Sunahara\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/105294198277942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article presents an integrative approach, using toxicological and chemical analyses, to screen for toxic substances that could be illegally added to the chemical-toilet sludge received at the wastewater treatment plant of the Montreal urban community. Four toxicity tests (Microtox, bacterial-respiration, root-elongation, and seed-germination tests) were used to establish the toxicity range of a \\\"normal\\\" sludge and the determination of threshold limits criteria. Chemical-toilet sludge samples were spiked with two types and amounts of contaminants (zinc, phenol). Conservative criteria were used to detect abnormal toxicity with great reliability and avoid false positives (i.e., detecting abnormal toxicity in nonspiked sludge). Taken individually, the seed-germination test was the least discriminating toxicological method (detecting only 10% of the spiked samples); the bacterial-respiration test was relatively better (detecting 72% of the spiked samples). Using a limited battery of two toxicity tests (Microtox and respiration test), the identification of contaminated chemical-toilet sludge can be detected with good efficiency and possibly great reliability (more than 80% of the spiked samples). This proposed procedure is efficient, easy to apply, cost-effective, and very fast (an abnormal toxicity level can be determined within a few hours).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"23-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/105294198277942\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/105294198277942\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/105294198277942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文提出了一种综合方法,使用毒理学和化学分析,筛选可能被非法添加到蒙特利尔城市社区污水处理厂的化学厕所污泥中的有毒物质。四种毒性试验(Microtox、细菌呼吸、根伸长和种子发芽试验)用于确定“正常”污泥的毒性范围和阈值限制标准的确定。化学厕所污泥样本被添加了两种类型和数量的污染物(锌和苯酚)。保守标准用于检测异常毒性,可靠性高,避免假阳性(即检测未加标污泥的异常毒性)。单独来看,种子萌发试验是鉴别性最低的毒理学方法(仅检测出10%的加标样品);细菌呼吸试验相对较好(检测出72%的加标样品)。使用两种有限的毒性测试(Microtox和呼吸测试),可以很有效地识别受污染的化学厕所污泥,并且可能具有很高的可靠性(超过80%的加样)。这种建议的程序是有效的,易于应用,具有成本效益,并且非常快速(异常毒性水平可以在几个小时内确定)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Screening of illicit toxic substances discharged in chemical toilet sludge.

This article presents an integrative approach, using toxicological and chemical analyses, to screen for toxic substances that could be illegally added to the chemical-toilet sludge received at the wastewater treatment plant of the Montreal urban community. Four toxicity tests (Microtox, bacterial-respiration, root-elongation, and seed-germination tests) were used to establish the toxicity range of a "normal" sludge and the determination of threshold limits criteria. Chemical-toilet sludge samples were spiked with two types and amounts of contaminants (zinc, phenol). Conservative criteria were used to detect abnormal toxicity with great reliability and avoid false positives (i.e., detecting abnormal toxicity in nonspiked sludge). Taken individually, the seed-germination test was the least discriminating toxicological method (detecting only 10% of the spiked samples); the bacterial-respiration test was relatively better (detecting 72% of the spiked samples). Using a limited battery of two toxicity tests (Microtox and respiration test), the identification of contaminated chemical-toilet sludge can be detected with good efficiency and possibly great reliability (more than 80% of the spiked samples). This proposed procedure is efficient, easy to apply, cost-effective, and very fast (an abnormal toxicity level can be determined within a few hours).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信