{"title":"透析功能状态量表:开发与测试。","authors":"C Thomas-Hawkins, J Fawcett, L Tulman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Development and psychometric testing of the Inventory of Functional Status-Dialysis (IFS-Dialysis), which was designed to measure functional status in persons who are receiving chronic incenter hemodialysis treatment.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Three-phase instrument development design: Phase 1--content validity assessment; Phase 2--examination of internal consistency reliability; Phase 3--examination of construct validity.</p><p><strong>Sample/setting: </strong>175 chronic hemodialysis patients recruited from an urban, free-standing, outpatient dialysis center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Content validity was determined using Popham's average congruency proceudre. Internal consistency reliability was determined using Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient. Construct validity was examined by bivariate correlations between the IFS-Dialysis and the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) in a subsample of 60 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Content validity was established at 90%. The alpha reliability coefficient for the IFS-Dialysis was 0.86. Subscale alpha coefficients ranged from 0.71-0.82. Correlation between the IFS-Dialysis and the KPS was 0.55. Correlations between the IFS-Dialysis and SF-36 subscales ranged from 0.14-0.53.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IFS-Dialysis has acceptable content validity, internal consistency, and initial construct validity. Use of the IFS-Dialysis in clinical practice is appropriate.</p>","PeriodicalId":76998,"journal":{"name":"ANNA journal","volume":"25 5","pages":"483-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Inventory of Functional Status-Dialysis: development and testing.\",\"authors\":\"C Thomas-Hawkins, J Fawcett, L Tulman\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Development and psychometric testing of the Inventory of Functional Status-Dialysis (IFS-Dialysis), which was designed to measure functional status in persons who are receiving chronic incenter hemodialysis treatment.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Three-phase instrument development design: Phase 1--content validity assessment; Phase 2--examination of internal consistency reliability; Phase 3--examination of construct validity.</p><p><strong>Sample/setting: </strong>175 chronic hemodialysis patients recruited from an urban, free-standing, outpatient dialysis center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Content validity was determined using Popham's average congruency proceudre. Internal consistency reliability was determined using Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient. Construct validity was examined by bivariate correlations between the IFS-Dialysis and the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) in a subsample of 60 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Content validity was established at 90%. The alpha reliability coefficient for the IFS-Dialysis was 0.86. Subscale alpha coefficients ranged from 0.71-0.82. Correlation between the IFS-Dialysis and the KPS was 0.55. Correlations between the IFS-Dialysis and SF-36 subscales ranged from 0.14-0.53.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IFS-Dialysis has acceptable content validity, internal consistency, and initial construct validity. Use of the IFS-Dialysis in clinical practice is appropriate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ANNA journal\",\"volume\":\"25 5\",\"pages\":\"483-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ANNA journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANNA journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Inventory of Functional Status-Dialysis: development and testing.
Objective: Development and psychometric testing of the Inventory of Functional Status-Dialysis (IFS-Dialysis), which was designed to measure functional status in persons who are receiving chronic incenter hemodialysis treatment.
Design: Three-phase instrument development design: Phase 1--content validity assessment; Phase 2--examination of internal consistency reliability; Phase 3--examination of construct validity.
Sample/setting: 175 chronic hemodialysis patients recruited from an urban, free-standing, outpatient dialysis center.
Methods: Content validity was determined using Popham's average congruency proceudre. Internal consistency reliability was determined using Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient. Construct validity was examined by bivariate correlations between the IFS-Dialysis and the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) in a subsample of 60 patients.
Results: Content validity was established at 90%. The alpha reliability coefficient for the IFS-Dialysis was 0.86. Subscale alpha coefficients ranged from 0.71-0.82. Correlation between the IFS-Dialysis and the KPS was 0.55. Correlations between the IFS-Dialysis and SF-36 subscales ranged from 0.14-0.53.
Conclusions: The IFS-Dialysis has acceptable content validity, internal consistency, and initial construct validity. Use of the IFS-Dialysis in clinical practice is appropriate.