{"title":"国家从业人员数据库:对麻醉师护士的启示。","authors":"M Kremer, M Faut-Callahan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB), created by the 1986 Health Care Quality Improvement Act, has been in operation since 1990. Hospitals and other credentialing bodies must query the NPDB when granting and renewing privileges. The NPDB receives about 25,000 reports of adverse actions against health practitioners each year. The NPDB was designed to be a flagging system providing information to licensing or credentialing authorities who would further examine practitioner records. Its purpose is to ensure that decision makers have information that might not otherwise be readily available, especially in the case of incompetent practitioners who move from hospital to hospital or state to state. Access to NPDB information is a concern for consumers and providers alike. Only 2% of matched reports to the NPDB made a difference in hospital privileging decisions. A limitation of NPDB information is that malpractice payments recorded in the NPDB do not necessarily constitute a comprehensive and definitive reflection of actual health care incompetence. All health care providers need to be aware of the NPDB, its mission, potential impact on their ability to be credentialed, and proposed additional uses of its information.</p>","PeriodicalId":77087,"journal":{"name":"CRNA : the clinical forum for nurse anesthetists","volume":"9 4","pages":"157-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The National Practitioner Data Bank: implications for nurse anesthetists.\",\"authors\":\"M Kremer, M Faut-Callahan\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB), created by the 1986 Health Care Quality Improvement Act, has been in operation since 1990. Hospitals and other credentialing bodies must query the NPDB when granting and renewing privileges. The NPDB receives about 25,000 reports of adverse actions against health practitioners each year. The NPDB was designed to be a flagging system providing information to licensing or credentialing authorities who would further examine practitioner records. Its purpose is to ensure that decision makers have information that might not otherwise be readily available, especially in the case of incompetent practitioners who move from hospital to hospital or state to state. Access to NPDB information is a concern for consumers and providers alike. Only 2% of matched reports to the NPDB made a difference in hospital privileging decisions. A limitation of NPDB information is that malpractice payments recorded in the NPDB do not necessarily constitute a comprehensive and definitive reflection of actual health care incompetence. All health care providers need to be aware of the NPDB, its mission, potential impact on their ability to be credentialed, and proposed additional uses of its information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CRNA : the clinical forum for nurse anesthetists\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"157-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CRNA : the clinical forum for nurse anesthetists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CRNA : the clinical forum for nurse anesthetists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The National Practitioner Data Bank: implications for nurse anesthetists.
The National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB), created by the 1986 Health Care Quality Improvement Act, has been in operation since 1990. Hospitals and other credentialing bodies must query the NPDB when granting and renewing privileges. The NPDB receives about 25,000 reports of adverse actions against health practitioners each year. The NPDB was designed to be a flagging system providing information to licensing or credentialing authorities who would further examine practitioner records. Its purpose is to ensure that decision makers have information that might not otherwise be readily available, especially in the case of incompetent practitioners who move from hospital to hospital or state to state. Access to NPDB information is a concern for consumers and providers alike. Only 2% of matched reports to the NPDB made a difference in hospital privileging decisions. A limitation of NPDB information is that malpractice payments recorded in the NPDB do not necessarily constitute a comprehensive and definitive reflection of actual health care incompetence. All health care providers need to be aware of the NPDB, its mission, potential impact on their ability to be credentialed, and proposed additional uses of its information.