甲氨蝶呤和硫硫酸金钠治疗早期活动性和糜烂性类风湿关节炎36个月的比较试验。

H Menninger, G Herborn, O Sander, J Blechschmidt, R Rau
{"title":"甲氨蝶呤和硫硫酸金钠治疗早期活动性和糜烂性类风湿关节炎36个月的比较试验。","authors":"H Menninger,&nbsp;G Herborn,&nbsp;O Sander,&nbsp;J Blechschmidt,&nbsp;R Rau","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/37.10.1060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the safety and efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) and gold sodium thiomalate (GSTM) in patients with active early erosive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during 3 yr.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 174 patients from two centres were randomly assigned to receive weekly i.m. injections of either 15 mg MTX or 50 mg GSTM for 1 yr in a double-blind fashion. Thereafter, the study was continued as an open prospective trial for an additional 2 yr with the same dose of MTX and half of the GSTM dose. Clinical and laboratory evaluations were carried out at baseline and at months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in all patients, including withdrawals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An intention-to-treat analysis revealed inactivation ['clinical remission': no swollen/tender joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of < 20 mm/h in males and < 30 mm in females, no corticosteroids within the last 4 weeks] in 33.3% of MTX patients and 37.9% of GSTM patients. The mean time to inactivation was insignificantly shorter with GSTM (MTX: 12.1 months; GSTM: 9.1 months; P = 0.06). At least marked improvement (> 50% reduction of the number of swollen/tender joints and of the ESR) was found in 78.2% (MTX) and 87.4% (GSTM). Withdrawal from the study due to toxicity was recorded in 16.1% of MTX and 52.9% of GSTM patients after a mean time of 30.6 and 6.1 months, respectively (P = 0.0001). In MTX and GSTM non-completers, inactivation was recorded in 24.2 and 54.7% of all patients. Among completers (54 and 34 patients, respectively), significant improvement compared to baseline was noted in all seven clinical variables (morning stiffness, overall joint pain, count of tender/swollen joints, Lansbury articular score, functional score and grip strength), ESR and C-reactive protein without significant intergroup differences. The steroid-sparing effect appeared more pronounced with GSTM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Over 36 months, treatment with MTX or GSTM induces inactivation ('clinical remission') of early and erosive RA in about one-third and at least marked improvement in four-fifths of patients (intention-to-treat analysis). Patients withdrawn from MTX or GSTM due to toxicity develop a clinical remission from the disease; this occurred more often with GSTM. Tolerability is significantly better with MTX.</p>","PeriodicalId":9307,"journal":{"name":"British journal of rheumatology","volume":"37 10","pages":"1060-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/rheumatology/37.10.1060","citationCount":"59","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A 36 month comparative trial of methotrexate and gold sodium thiomalate in the treatment of early active and erosive rheumatoid arthritis.\",\"authors\":\"H Menninger,&nbsp;G Herborn,&nbsp;O Sander,&nbsp;J Blechschmidt,&nbsp;R Rau\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/rheumatology/37.10.1060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the safety and efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) and gold sodium thiomalate (GSTM) in patients with active early erosive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during 3 yr.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 174 patients from two centres were randomly assigned to receive weekly i.m. injections of either 15 mg MTX or 50 mg GSTM for 1 yr in a double-blind fashion. Thereafter, the study was continued as an open prospective trial for an additional 2 yr with the same dose of MTX and half of the GSTM dose. Clinical and laboratory evaluations were carried out at baseline and at months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in all patients, including withdrawals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An intention-to-treat analysis revealed inactivation ['clinical remission': no swollen/tender joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of < 20 mm/h in males and < 30 mm in females, no corticosteroids within the last 4 weeks] in 33.3% of MTX patients and 37.9% of GSTM patients. The mean time to inactivation was insignificantly shorter with GSTM (MTX: 12.1 months; GSTM: 9.1 months; P = 0.06). At least marked improvement (> 50% reduction of the number of swollen/tender joints and of the ESR) was found in 78.2% (MTX) and 87.4% (GSTM). Withdrawal from the study due to toxicity was recorded in 16.1% of MTX and 52.9% of GSTM patients after a mean time of 30.6 and 6.1 months, respectively (P = 0.0001). In MTX and GSTM non-completers, inactivation was recorded in 24.2 and 54.7% of all patients. Among completers (54 and 34 patients, respectively), significant improvement compared to baseline was noted in all seven clinical variables (morning stiffness, overall joint pain, count of tender/swollen joints, Lansbury articular score, functional score and grip strength), ESR and C-reactive protein without significant intergroup differences. The steroid-sparing effect appeared more pronounced with GSTM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Over 36 months, treatment with MTX or GSTM induces inactivation ('clinical remission') of early and erosive RA in about one-third and at least marked improvement in four-fifths of patients (intention-to-treat analysis). Patients withdrawn from MTX or GSTM due to toxicity develop a clinical remission from the disease; this occurred more often with GSTM. Tolerability is significantly better with MTX.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"37 10\",\"pages\":\"1060-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/rheumatology/37.10.1060\",\"citationCount\":\"59\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/37.10.1060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/37.10.1060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59

摘要

目的:比较甲氨蝶呤(MTX)和硫硫酸金钠(GSTM)治疗活动性早期糜烂性类风湿关节炎(RA)患者3年的安全性和有效性。方法:来自两个中心的174名患者随机分配接受每周一次的15 mg MTX或50 mg GSTM注射,为期1年,双盲方式。此后,该研究作为一项开放的前瞻性试验继续进行2年,使用相同剂量的MTX和一半的GSTM剂量。在基线和6、12、18、24和36个月对所有患者进行临床和实验室评估,包括停药。结果:意向治疗分析显示,33.3%的MTX患者和37.9%的GSTM患者失活[“临床缓解”:无肿胀/压痛关节,男性红细胞沉降率(ESR) < 20 mm/h,女性< 30 mm/h,过去4周内未使用皮质类固醇]。GSTM的平均失活时间无显著性缩短(MTX: 12.1个月;GSTM: 9.1个月;P = 0.06)。78.2% (MTX)和87.4% (GSTM)患者至少有显著改善(肿胀/压痛关节和ESR数量减少> 50%)。MTX患者中有16.1%因毒性退出研究,GSTM患者中有52.9%因毒性退出研究,平均时间分别为30.6和6.1个月(P = 0.0001)。在MTX和GSTM未完成的患者中,分别有24.2%和54.7%的患者失活。在完成者(分别为54例和34例)中,与基线相比,所有7个临床变量(晨僵、整体关节疼痛、压痛/肿胀关节计数、Lansbury关节评分、功能评分和握力)、ESR和c反应蛋白均有显著改善,组间无显著差异。GSTM的激素节约效果更为明显。结论:超过36个月,MTX或GSTM治疗诱导约三分之一的早期和侵蚀性RA失活(“临床缓解”),至少五分之四的患者有显着改善(意向治疗分析)。由于毒性而停用MTX或GSTM的患者出现了疾病的临床缓解;这种情况在GSTM中更常见。MTX的耐受性明显更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A 36 month comparative trial of methotrexate and gold sodium thiomalate in the treatment of early active and erosive rheumatoid arthritis.

Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) and gold sodium thiomalate (GSTM) in patients with active early erosive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during 3 yr.

Methods: A total of 174 patients from two centres were randomly assigned to receive weekly i.m. injections of either 15 mg MTX or 50 mg GSTM for 1 yr in a double-blind fashion. Thereafter, the study was continued as an open prospective trial for an additional 2 yr with the same dose of MTX and half of the GSTM dose. Clinical and laboratory evaluations were carried out at baseline and at months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in all patients, including withdrawals.

Results: An intention-to-treat analysis revealed inactivation ['clinical remission': no swollen/tender joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of < 20 mm/h in males and < 30 mm in females, no corticosteroids within the last 4 weeks] in 33.3% of MTX patients and 37.9% of GSTM patients. The mean time to inactivation was insignificantly shorter with GSTM (MTX: 12.1 months; GSTM: 9.1 months; P = 0.06). At least marked improvement (> 50% reduction of the number of swollen/tender joints and of the ESR) was found in 78.2% (MTX) and 87.4% (GSTM). Withdrawal from the study due to toxicity was recorded in 16.1% of MTX and 52.9% of GSTM patients after a mean time of 30.6 and 6.1 months, respectively (P = 0.0001). In MTX and GSTM non-completers, inactivation was recorded in 24.2 and 54.7% of all patients. Among completers (54 and 34 patients, respectively), significant improvement compared to baseline was noted in all seven clinical variables (morning stiffness, overall joint pain, count of tender/swollen joints, Lansbury articular score, functional score and grip strength), ESR and C-reactive protein without significant intergroup differences. The steroid-sparing effect appeared more pronounced with GSTM.

Conclusion: Over 36 months, treatment with MTX or GSTM induces inactivation ('clinical remission') of early and erosive RA in about one-third and at least marked improvement in four-fifths of patients (intention-to-treat analysis). Patients withdrawn from MTX or GSTM due to toxicity develop a clinical remission from the disease; this occurred more often with GSTM. Tolerability is significantly better with MTX.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信