免疫吸附联合大剂量甲基强的松龙治疗狼疮性肾炎早期患者可能的适应症。

M Funauchi, S Ikoma, A Imada, A Kanamaru
{"title":"免疫吸附联合大剂量甲基强的松龙治疗狼疮性肾炎早期患者可能的适应症。","authors":"M Funauchi,&nbsp;S Ikoma,&nbsp;A Imada,&nbsp;A Kanamaru","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Therapeutic protocol and indication of immunoadsorption therapy (IA) for lupus nephritis (LN) have not been established, although it has been reported to be effective in resistant cases. Here, we performed IA and double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) in combination with high-dose methyprednisolone in patients with LN, and studied possible indications of IA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IA and DFPP were performed in 9 patients each with LN. They were immediately followed by intravenous infusion of 500 mg of methylprednisolone for prevention of rebound phenomenon. After these treatments 1-2 times a week, a total of 4-6 times, clinical findings were observed for 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The effects on clinical findings such as erythema, fever and arthralgia, serum complement activity, mean urinary protein and reduction of dose of adrenocorticosteroids were comparable in both treatments. Serum titers of ADNA decreased by IA more than DFPP (16% in IA, 38% in DFPP in 3 months), while serum immunoglobulins decreased by IA less than DFPP. Responses in urinary protein after IA tended to be better in patients with high titer of serum ADNA and without nephrotic syndrome, and not associated with disease activity of SLE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Removal of ADNA was more selective in IA than in DFPP, and the effects of IA were comparable with those of DFPP. Since patients with low titers of serum ADNA and nephrotic syndrome showed poor responses to IA, it might be worth trying rather in patients with early phase of lupus nephritis.</p>","PeriodicalId":75994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical & laboratory immunology","volume":"49 2","pages":"47-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combination of immunoadsorption therapy and high-dose methylprednisolone in patients with lupus nephritis; possible indications in patients with early stage.\",\"authors\":\"M Funauchi,&nbsp;S Ikoma,&nbsp;A Imada,&nbsp;A Kanamaru\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Therapeutic protocol and indication of immunoadsorption therapy (IA) for lupus nephritis (LN) have not been established, although it has been reported to be effective in resistant cases. Here, we performed IA and double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) in combination with high-dose methyprednisolone in patients with LN, and studied possible indications of IA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IA and DFPP were performed in 9 patients each with LN. They were immediately followed by intravenous infusion of 500 mg of methylprednisolone for prevention of rebound phenomenon. After these treatments 1-2 times a week, a total of 4-6 times, clinical findings were observed for 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The effects on clinical findings such as erythema, fever and arthralgia, serum complement activity, mean urinary protein and reduction of dose of adrenocorticosteroids were comparable in both treatments. Serum titers of ADNA decreased by IA more than DFPP (16% in IA, 38% in DFPP in 3 months), while serum immunoglobulins decreased by IA less than DFPP. Responses in urinary protein after IA tended to be better in patients with high titer of serum ADNA and without nephrotic syndrome, and not associated with disease activity of SLE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Removal of ADNA was more selective in IA than in DFPP, and the effects of IA were comparable with those of DFPP. Since patients with low titers of serum ADNA and nephrotic syndrome showed poor responses to IA, it might be worth trying rather in patients with early phase of lupus nephritis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical & laboratory immunology\",\"volume\":\"49 2\",\"pages\":\"47-57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical & laboratory immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical & laboratory immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:免疫吸附疗法(IA)治疗狼疮性肾炎(LN)的治疗方案和适应症尚未确定,尽管有报道称它对耐药病例有效。在这里,我们对LN患者进行了IA和双滤过血浆置换(DFPP)联合大剂量甲基强的松龙,并研究了IA的可能适应症。方法:对9例LN患者分别行IA和DFPP检查。随后立即静脉滴注甲泼尼龙500 mg,预防反弹现象。治疗后,每周1-2次,共4-6次,观察6个月的临床表现。结果:两种治疗方法对红斑、发热、关节痛、血清补体活性、平均尿蛋白及肾上腺皮质激素减量等临床表现的影响具有可比性。血清ADNA滴度IA下降幅度大于DFPP (IA组为16%,DFPP组为38%),而血清免疫球蛋白滴度IA下降幅度小于DFPP。在血清ADNA滴度高且无肾病综合征且与SLE疾病活动性无关的患者中,IA后尿蛋白的反应往往更好。结论:与DFPP相比,IA对ADNA的去除具有更强的选择性,且IA的效果与DFPP相当。由于血清ADNA滴度低和肾病综合征的患者对IA的反应较差,因此早期狼疮性肾炎患者可能值得尝试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combination of immunoadsorption therapy and high-dose methylprednisolone in patients with lupus nephritis; possible indications in patients with early stage.

Objective: Therapeutic protocol and indication of immunoadsorption therapy (IA) for lupus nephritis (LN) have not been established, although it has been reported to be effective in resistant cases. Here, we performed IA and double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) in combination with high-dose methyprednisolone in patients with LN, and studied possible indications of IA.

Methods: IA and DFPP were performed in 9 patients each with LN. They were immediately followed by intravenous infusion of 500 mg of methylprednisolone for prevention of rebound phenomenon. After these treatments 1-2 times a week, a total of 4-6 times, clinical findings were observed for 6 months.

Results: The effects on clinical findings such as erythema, fever and arthralgia, serum complement activity, mean urinary protein and reduction of dose of adrenocorticosteroids were comparable in both treatments. Serum titers of ADNA decreased by IA more than DFPP (16% in IA, 38% in DFPP in 3 months), while serum immunoglobulins decreased by IA less than DFPP. Responses in urinary protein after IA tended to be better in patients with high titer of serum ADNA and without nephrotic syndrome, and not associated with disease activity of SLE.

Conclusion: Removal of ADNA was more selective in IA than in DFPP, and the effects of IA were comparable with those of DFPP. Since patients with low titers of serum ADNA and nephrotic syndrome showed poor responses to IA, it might be worth trying rather in patients with early phase of lupus nephritis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信