对家庭医生辅助戒烟干预相关研究的批判性回顾。

P G Ritvo, M J Irvine, E A Lindsay, N Kraetschmer, N Blair, Z M Shnek
{"title":"对家庭医生辅助戒烟干预相关研究的批判性回顾。","authors":"P G Ritvo,&nbsp;M J Irvine,&nbsp;E A Lindsay,&nbsp;N Kraetschmer,&nbsp;N Blair,&nbsp;Z M Shnek","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A review of family physician-assisted smoking cessation research indicates that the family practice setting affords an excellent opportunity to intervene with a large proportion of smokers, at a time when they are receptive to health promotion messages. Outcome data at 6- and 12-month follow-up intervals indicate the value of combining 3 key strategies in achieving optimal results: physician advice and support, nicotine replacement therapy, and cognitive-behavioural counselling. The authors' review identifies questions that need to be addressed in future research: How can barriers to program delivery be overcome in the family practice setting? What is the best way to ensure optimal integration of the 3 key strategies? Which follow-up intervals are appropriate (e.g., 6 months, 12 months, 18 months) given the finding that relapse is common and that most smokers make several quit attempts before stopping for good?</p>","PeriodicalId":79570,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC","volume":"1 4","pages":"289-303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A critical review of research related to family physician-assisted smoking cessation interventions.\",\"authors\":\"P G Ritvo,&nbsp;M J Irvine,&nbsp;E A Lindsay,&nbsp;N Kraetschmer,&nbsp;N Blair,&nbsp;Z M Shnek\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A review of family physician-assisted smoking cessation research indicates that the family practice setting affords an excellent opportunity to intervene with a large proportion of smokers, at a time when they are receptive to health promotion messages. Outcome data at 6- and 12-month follow-up intervals indicate the value of combining 3 key strategies in achieving optimal results: physician advice and support, nicotine replacement therapy, and cognitive-behavioural counselling. The authors' review identifies questions that need to be addressed in future research: How can barriers to program delivery be overcome in the family practice setting? What is the best way to ensure optimal integration of the 3 key strategies? Which follow-up intervals are appropriate (e.g., 6 months, 12 months, 18 months) given the finding that relapse is common and that most smokers make several quit attempts before stopping for good?</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC\",\"volume\":\"1 4\",\"pages\":\"289-303\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对家庭医生协助的戒烟研究的审查表明,家庭实践环境提供了一个极好的机会,在他们接受健康促进信息的时候,对很大一部分吸烟者进行干预。6个月和12个月随访期间的结果数据表明,结合3种关键策略在达到最佳结果方面的价值:医生建议和支持、尼古丁替代疗法和认知行为咨询。作者的回顾确定了未来研究中需要解决的问题:如何在家庭实践环境中克服项目交付的障碍?如何才能确保这三个关键战略的最佳整合?考虑到复发是常见的,而且大多数吸烟者在彻底戒烟前都尝试过几次,那么哪个随访间隔是合适的(例如,6个月、12个月、18个月)?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A critical review of research related to family physician-assisted smoking cessation interventions.

A review of family physician-assisted smoking cessation research indicates that the family practice setting affords an excellent opportunity to intervene with a large proportion of smokers, at a time when they are receptive to health promotion messages. Outcome data at 6- and 12-month follow-up intervals indicate the value of combining 3 key strategies in achieving optimal results: physician advice and support, nicotine replacement therapy, and cognitive-behavioural counselling. The authors' review identifies questions that need to be addressed in future research: How can barriers to program delivery be overcome in the family practice setting? What is the best way to ensure optimal integration of the 3 key strategies? Which follow-up intervals are appropriate (e.g., 6 months, 12 months, 18 months) given the finding that relapse is common and that most smokers make several quit attempts before stopping for good?

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信