学校吸烟控制:一项研究议程。

S R Manske, K S Brown, A J Cameron
{"title":"学校吸烟控制:一项研究议程。","authors":"S R Manske,&nbsp;K S Brown,&nbsp;A J Cameron","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Within the context of a framework for cancer control, this article reviews evidence and suggests research directions for 3 types of school-based smoking interventions: elementary school prevention, secondary school interventions and interventions linking community and school. Directions for smoking research in elementary schools include improving adoption through the provision of effectiveness criteria, tailoring interventions to schools and training. Monitoring at micro and macro levels may help planning and implementation, but clearer evidence is required of its feasibility. Fundamental research should explore new options to understand why youth do not start smoking. Smoking intervention research at the secondary school level is less well established, with only 1 effectiveness trial reported. We recommend testing models that involve youth in developing their own solutions and examining the interaction of various control measures. Sustainability issues have led researchers to embed school-based smoking interventions in community-wide activities. Intervention research of this sort still needs to determine how to apply approaches (e.g., comprehensive school health) and what the appropriate roles are (such as technical assistance) for community agencies. All research using these school-community approaches needs to include process measures to explain potential failures to obtain significant differences between components. In addition, we call for research on the training of educators and health personnel, to increase the priority given to smoking prevention and improve the implementation of existing programs. Research on policy initiatives that lead to effective training needs to be explored. Finally, we argue that application of the principles incorporated into the cancer control framework (e.g., through participatory research methods) strengthens the research process and results.</p>","PeriodicalId":79570,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC","volume":"1 3","pages":"196-212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"School-based smoking control: a research agenda.\",\"authors\":\"S R Manske,&nbsp;K S Brown,&nbsp;A J Cameron\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Within the context of a framework for cancer control, this article reviews evidence and suggests research directions for 3 types of school-based smoking interventions: elementary school prevention, secondary school interventions and interventions linking community and school. Directions for smoking research in elementary schools include improving adoption through the provision of effectiveness criteria, tailoring interventions to schools and training. Monitoring at micro and macro levels may help planning and implementation, but clearer evidence is required of its feasibility. Fundamental research should explore new options to understand why youth do not start smoking. Smoking intervention research at the secondary school level is less well established, with only 1 effectiveness trial reported. We recommend testing models that involve youth in developing their own solutions and examining the interaction of various control measures. Sustainability issues have led researchers to embed school-based smoking interventions in community-wide activities. Intervention research of this sort still needs to determine how to apply approaches (e.g., comprehensive school health) and what the appropriate roles are (such as technical assistance) for community agencies. All research using these school-community approaches needs to include process measures to explain potential failures to obtain significant differences between components. In addition, we call for research on the training of educators and health personnel, to increase the priority given to smoking prevention and improve the implementation of existing programs. Research on policy initiatives that lead to effective training needs to be explored. Finally, we argue that application of the principles incorporated into the cancer control framework (e.g., through participatory research methods) strengthens the research process and results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC\",\"volume\":\"1 3\",\"pages\":\"196-212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在癌症控制框架的背景下,本文综述了基于学校的3种吸烟干预措施的证据并提出了研究方向:小学预防、中学干预和社区与学校联系干预。在小学进行吸烟研究的方向包括通过提供有效性标准、使干预措施适合学校和培训来改善采用情况。微观和宏观层面的监测可能有助于规划和执行,但需要更明确的证据来证明其可行性。基础研究应该探索新的选择来理解为什么年轻人不开始吸烟。中学水平的吸烟干预研究不太完善,仅报道了1项有效性试验。我们建议测试让青年参与制定自己的解决方案的模式,并检查各种控制措施的相互作用。可持续性问题促使研究人员将以学校为基础的吸烟干预措施纳入社区活动。这类干预研究仍然需要确定如何应用方法(例如,全面的学校保健)以及社区机构的适当作用是什么(例如,技术援助)。所有使用这些学校-社区方法的研究都需要包括过程措施来解释潜在的失败,以获得组件之间的显着差异。此外,我们呼吁对教育工作者和卫生人员的培训进行研究,以增加对预防吸烟的重视,并改进现有方案的实施。需要对导致有效培训的政策倡议进行研究。最后,我们认为,将这些原则纳入癌症控制框架(例如,通过参与式研究方法)的应用可以加强研究过程和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
School-based smoking control: a research agenda.

Within the context of a framework for cancer control, this article reviews evidence and suggests research directions for 3 types of school-based smoking interventions: elementary school prevention, secondary school interventions and interventions linking community and school. Directions for smoking research in elementary schools include improving adoption through the provision of effectiveness criteria, tailoring interventions to schools and training. Monitoring at micro and macro levels may help planning and implementation, but clearer evidence is required of its feasibility. Fundamental research should explore new options to understand why youth do not start smoking. Smoking intervention research at the secondary school level is less well established, with only 1 effectiveness trial reported. We recommend testing models that involve youth in developing their own solutions and examining the interaction of various control measures. Sustainability issues have led researchers to embed school-based smoking interventions in community-wide activities. Intervention research of this sort still needs to determine how to apply approaches (e.g., comprehensive school health) and what the appropriate roles are (such as technical assistance) for community agencies. All research using these school-community approaches needs to include process measures to explain potential failures to obtain significant differences between components. In addition, we call for research on the training of educators and health personnel, to increase the priority given to smoking prevention and improve the implementation of existing programs. Research on policy initiatives that lead to effective training needs to be explored. Finally, we argue that application of the principles incorporated into the cancer control framework (e.g., through participatory research methods) strengthens the research process and results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信