脑神经胶质肿瘤放射治疗的现代方面。

Forum (Genoa, Italy) Pub Date : 1998-07-01
R Rampling
{"title":"脑神经胶质肿瘤放射治疗的现代方面。","authors":"R Rampling","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radiation was conclusively proved to be of value in the treatment of malignant gliomas in the late 1970's where it enabled an approximate doubling of the survival time. Further study defined a number of prognostic factors which provide a basis for selecting patients for treatment. The introduction of computer tomography (and later magnetic resonance) scanning allowed a more rational approach to target volume definition and a reduction in radiation-related morbidity. Dose-ranging studies defined a standard approach to treatment (60 Gray in 30 fractions). Since then numerous attempts have been made to improve on these results. Marginal benefits have been claimed for altered fractionation schemes, limited volume dose escalation (implants and stereotaxy), radiation sensitisers and particle therapies. However none has become routine in clinical practice. Advances in planning technology have allowed a further reduction in the volume of normal brain irradiated and the potential for dose escalation. Low grade astrocytoma has not been examined in the same way and great doubt exists with respect to optimal treatment. There is a great opportunity for research to realise the potential in the new techniques for improving the outlook for patients with malignant glioma and in clarifying the role of radiation in low grade tumours.</p>","PeriodicalId":79489,"journal":{"name":"Forum (Genoa, Italy)","volume":"8 3","pages":"289-301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modern aspects of radiation therapy for glial tumours of the brain.\",\"authors\":\"R Rampling\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Radiation was conclusively proved to be of value in the treatment of malignant gliomas in the late 1970's where it enabled an approximate doubling of the survival time. Further study defined a number of prognostic factors which provide a basis for selecting patients for treatment. The introduction of computer tomography (and later magnetic resonance) scanning allowed a more rational approach to target volume definition and a reduction in radiation-related morbidity. Dose-ranging studies defined a standard approach to treatment (60 Gray in 30 fractions). Since then numerous attempts have been made to improve on these results. Marginal benefits have been claimed for altered fractionation schemes, limited volume dose escalation (implants and stereotaxy), radiation sensitisers and particle therapies. However none has become routine in clinical practice. Advances in planning technology have allowed a further reduction in the volume of normal brain irradiated and the potential for dose escalation. Low grade astrocytoma has not been examined in the same way and great doubt exists with respect to optimal treatment. There is a great opportunity for research to realise the potential in the new techniques for improving the outlook for patients with malignant glioma and in clarifying the role of radiation in low grade tumours.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forum (Genoa, Italy)\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"289-301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forum (Genoa, Italy)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forum (Genoa, Italy)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在20世纪70年代晚期,放疗被证明在治疗恶性神经胶质瘤中是有价值的,它使生存时间大约增加了一倍。进一步的研究确定了一些预后因素,为选择患者进行治疗提供了依据。计算机断层扫描(以及后来的磁共振)扫描的引入使得靶体积的定义更加合理,并减少了与辐射相关的发病率。剂量范围研究确定了一种标准的治疗方法(60 Gray分为30份)。从那时起,人们进行了许多尝试来改善这些结果。据称,改变的分离方案、有限的体积剂量递增(植入物和立体定向)、辐射致敏剂和粒子疗法具有边际效益。然而,没有一个在临床实践中成为常规。规划技术的进步使正常脑受辐照的体积进一步减少,并有可能增加剂量。低级别星形细胞瘤尚未以相同的方式进行检查,并且在最佳治疗方面存在很大的疑问。研究有很大的机会来实现新技术的潜力,以改善恶性胶质瘤患者的前景,并澄清放射在低级别肿瘤中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modern aspects of radiation therapy for glial tumours of the brain.

Radiation was conclusively proved to be of value in the treatment of malignant gliomas in the late 1970's where it enabled an approximate doubling of the survival time. Further study defined a number of prognostic factors which provide a basis for selecting patients for treatment. The introduction of computer tomography (and later magnetic resonance) scanning allowed a more rational approach to target volume definition and a reduction in radiation-related morbidity. Dose-ranging studies defined a standard approach to treatment (60 Gray in 30 fractions). Since then numerous attempts have been made to improve on these results. Marginal benefits have been claimed for altered fractionation schemes, limited volume dose escalation (implants and stereotaxy), radiation sensitisers and particle therapies. However none has become routine in clinical practice. Advances in planning technology have allowed a further reduction in the volume of normal brain irradiated and the potential for dose escalation. Low grade astrocytoma has not been examined in the same way and great doubt exists with respect to optimal treatment. There is a great opportunity for research to realise the potential in the new techniques for improving the outlook for patients with malignant glioma and in clarifying the role of radiation in low grade tumours.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信