氦气环境下的语音清晰度评估。2语音清晰度指数。

IF 2.1 2区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ACOUSTICS
L L Mendel, B W Hamill, J E Hendrix, L J Crepeau, J D Pelton, M D Miley, E E Kadlec
{"title":"氦气环境下的语音清晰度评估。2语音清晰度指数。","authors":"L L Mendel,&nbsp;B W Hamill,&nbsp;J E Hendrix,&nbsp;L J Crepeau,&nbsp;J D Pelton,&nbsp;M D Miley,&nbsp;E E Kadlec","doi":"10.1121/1.424373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Speech Intelligibility Index (SII) was measured for Navy divers participating in two saturation deep dives and for a group of nondivers to test different communication systems and their components. These SIIs were validated using the Speech Perception in Noise (SPIN) test and the Griffiths version of the Modified Rhyme Test (GMRT). Our goal was to determine if either of these assessments was sensitive enough to provide an objective measure of speech intelligibility when speech was processed through different helmets and helium speech unscramblers (HSUs). Results indicated that SII values and percent intelligibility decreased incrementally as background noise level increased. SIIs were very reliable across the different groups of subjects indicating that the SII was a strong measurement for predicting speech intelligibility to compare linear system components such as helmets. The SII was not useful in measuring intelligibility through nonlinear devices such as HSUs. The speech intelligibility scores on the GMRT and SPIN tests were useful when the system component being compared had a large measurable difference, such as in helmet type. However, when the differences were more subtle, such as differences in HSUs, neither the SPIN nor the GMRT appeared sensitive enough to make such distinctions. These results have theoretical as well as practical value for measuring the quality and intelligibility of helium speech enhancement systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":17168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","volume":"104 3 Pt 1","pages":"1609-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"1998-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1121/1.424373","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Speech intelligibility assessment in a helium environment. II. The speech intelligibility index.\",\"authors\":\"L L Mendel,&nbsp;B W Hamill,&nbsp;J E Hendrix,&nbsp;L J Crepeau,&nbsp;J D Pelton,&nbsp;M D Miley,&nbsp;E E Kadlec\",\"doi\":\"10.1121/1.424373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Speech Intelligibility Index (SII) was measured for Navy divers participating in two saturation deep dives and for a group of nondivers to test different communication systems and their components. These SIIs were validated using the Speech Perception in Noise (SPIN) test and the Griffiths version of the Modified Rhyme Test (GMRT). Our goal was to determine if either of these assessments was sensitive enough to provide an objective measure of speech intelligibility when speech was processed through different helmets and helium speech unscramblers (HSUs). Results indicated that SII values and percent intelligibility decreased incrementally as background noise level increased. SIIs were very reliable across the different groups of subjects indicating that the SII was a strong measurement for predicting speech intelligibility to compare linear system components such as helmets. The SII was not useful in measuring intelligibility through nonlinear devices such as HSUs. The speech intelligibility scores on the GMRT and SPIN tests were useful when the system component being compared had a large measurable difference, such as in helmet type. However, when the differences were more subtle, such as differences in HSUs, neither the SPIN nor the GMRT appeared sensitive enough to make such distinctions. These results have theoretical as well as practical value for measuring the quality and intelligibility of helium speech enhancement systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America\",\"volume\":\"104 3 Pt 1\",\"pages\":\"1609-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1121/1.424373\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1121/1.424373\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/1.424373","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

语音清晰度指数(SII)是为参加两次饱和深潜的海军潜水员和一组非潜水员测试不同的通信系统及其组件而测量的。这些sii使用噪音中的语音感知(SPIN)测试和Griffiths版本的修改押韵测试(GMRT)进行验证。我们的目标是确定当语音通过不同的头盔和氦语音解读器(hsu)处理时,这两种评估是否足够敏感,以提供语音可理解性的客观衡量标准。结果表明,随着背景噪声水平的增加,SII值和可理解度百分比逐渐降低。SII在不同的受试者群体中非常可靠,这表明SII是预测语音可理解性的有力测量方法,可以比较线性系统组件(如头盔)。SII在通过诸如hsu之类的非线性设备测量可理解性时是没有用的。GMRT和SPIN测试的语音清晰度分数在被比较的系统组件具有较大的可测量差异时是有用的,例如在头盔类型上。然而,当差异更细微时,比如hsu的差异,SPIN和GMRT似乎都不够敏感,无法做出这样的区分。这些结果对测量氦语音增强系统的质量和可理解性具有理论和实用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Speech intelligibility assessment in a helium environment. II. The speech intelligibility index.

The Speech Intelligibility Index (SII) was measured for Navy divers participating in two saturation deep dives and for a group of nondivers to test different communication systems and their components. These SIIs were validated using the Speech Perception in Noise (SPIN) test and the Griffiths version of the Modified Rhyme Test (GMRT). Our goal was to determine if either of these assessments was sensitive enough to provide an objective measure of speech intelligibility when speech was processed through different helmets and helium speech unscramblers (HSUs). Results indicated that SII values and percent intelligibility decreased incrementally as background noise level increased. SIIs were very reliable across the different groups of subjects indicating that the SII was a strong measurement for predicting speech intelligibility to compare linear system components such as helmets. The SII was not useful in measuring intelligibility through nonlinear devices such as HSUs. The speech intelligibility scores on the GMRT and SPIN tests were useful when the system component being compared had a large measurable difference, such as in helmet type. However, when the differences were more subtle, such as differences in HSUs, neither the SPIN nor the GMRT appeared sensitive enough to make such distinctions. These results have theoretical as well as practical value for measuring the quality and intelligibility of helium speech enhancement systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1433
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Since 1929 The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America has been the leading source of theoretical and experimental research results in the broad interdisciplinary study of sound. Subject coverage includes: linear and nonlinear acoustics; aeroacoustics, underwater sound and acoustical oceanography; ultrasonics and quantum acoustics; architectural and structural acoustics and vibration; speech, music and noise; psychology and physiology of hearing; engineering acoustics, transduction; bioacoustics, animal bioacoustics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信