分析非加性联合结构:用Rasch模型概率复合事件。

Journal of outcome measurement Pub Date : 1998-01-01
G Karabatsos
{"title":"分析非加性联合结构:用Rasch模型概率复合事件。","authors":"G Karabatsos","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The following study proposes a Rasch method to measure variables of nonadditive conjoint structures, where dichotomous response combinations are evaluated. In this framework, both the number of endorsed items and their latent positions are considered. This is different from the cumulative response process (measurable by the Rasch model), where the probability of a positive response to an item with measure delta iota is considered a monotonic increasing function of the person's measure beta nu. This is also unlike the unfolding framework, where the probability of a positive response is maximum when beta nu = delta iota, and monotonically decreases as magnitude of beta nu-delta iota approaches infinity. The method involves four steps. In Step 1, items are scaled by the Rasch model for paired comparisons to produce a variable definition. These scale values serve as a basis for Steps 2 and 4. In Step 2, the nonadditive conjoint system is restructured to additive. The quantitative hypothesis of the restructured data is tested by the axioms of conjoint measurement theory in Step 3. This data is then analyzed by the Rasch rating scale model in Step 4 to evaluate individual response combinations, using the Step 1 item calibrations as anchors. The method was applied to simulated person responses of the Schedule of Recent Events (Holmes and Rahe, 1967). The results suggest that the method is useful and effective. It scales items with a robust method of paired comparisons, ensures additivity and quantification of the conjoint person-item matrix, produces a reasonable ordering of person measures from the perspective of individual response combinations, and provides satisfactory person and item separation (i.e., reliability). Furthermore, the restructured data reproduces SRE item scale values obtained by paired comparisons in Step 1.</p>","PeriodicalId":79673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of outcome measurement","volume":"2 3","pages":"191-221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing nonadditive conjoint structures: compounding events by Rasch model probabilities.\",\"authors\":\"G Karabatsos\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The following study proposes a Rasch method to measure variables of nonadditive conjoint structures, where dichotomous response combinations are evaluated. In this framework, both the number of endorsed items and their latent positions are considered. This is different from the cumulative response process (measurable by the Rasch model), where the probability of a positive response to an item with measure delta iota is considered a monotonic increasing function of the person's measure beta nu. This is also unlike the unfolding framework, where the probability of a positive response is maximum when beta nu = delta iota, and monotonically decreases as magnitude of beta nu-delta iota approaches infinity. The method involves four steps. In Step 1, items are scaled by the Rasch model for paired comparisons to produce a variable definition. These scale values serve as a basis for Steps 2 and 4. In Step 2, the nonadditive conjoint system is restructured to additive. The quantitative hypothesis of the restructured data is tested by the axioms of conjoint measurement theory in Step 3. This data is then analyzed by the Rasch rating scale model in Step 4 to evaluate individual response combinations, using the Step 1 item calibrations as anchors. The method was applied to simulated person responses of the Schedule of Recent Events (Holmes and Rahe, 1967). The results suggest that the method is useful and effective. It scales items with a robust method of paired comparisons, ensures additivity and quantification of the conjoint person-item matrix, produces a reasonable ordering of person measures from the perspective of individual response combinations, and provides satisfactory person and item separation (i.e., reliability). Furthermore, the restructured data reproduces SRE item scale values obtained by paired comparisons in Step 1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of outcome measurement\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"191-221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of outcome measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of outcome measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

下面的研究提出了一种Rasch方法来测量非可加性连接结构的变量,其中二元响应组合进行了评估。在这一框架内,核可的项目数目及其潜在的立场都要加以考虑。这与累积反应过程(通过Rasch模型可测量)不同,在累积反应过程中,对测量值为delta iota的项目做出积极反应的概率被认为是一个单调的递增函数。这也不同于展开的框架,在展开的框架中,当β nu = δ iota时,正响应的概率是最大的,并且随着β nu- δ iota的大小接近无穷大而单调减少。该方法包括四个步骤。在步骤1中,通过Rasch模型对项目进行缩放,以进行配对比较,从而产生变量定义。这些比例值作为步骤2和步骤4的基础。第二步,将非加性联结系统重构为加性联结系统。在步骤3中,利用联合测量理论的公理对重构数据的定量假设进行检验。然后使用步骤1的项目校准作为锚点,通过步骤4中的Rasch评分量表模型分析这些数据以评估个人反应组合。将该方法应用于模拟人对近期事件表的反应(Holmes和Rahe, 1967)。结果表明,该方法是实用、有效的。它用一种稳健的配对比较方法来衡量项目,确保联合人-项目矩阵的可加性和量化性,从个体反应组合的角度产生合理的人测量顺序,并提供令人满意的人与项目分离(即可靠性)。此外,重组后的数据再现了步骤1中通过配对比较获得的SRE项目量表值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analyzing nonadditive conjoint structures: compounding events by Rasch model probabilities.

The following study proposes a Rasch method to measure variables of nonadditive conjoint structures, where dichotomous response combinations are evaluated. In this framework, both the number of endorsed items and their latent positions are considered. This is different from the cumulative response process (measurable by the Rasch model), where the probability of a positive response to an item with measure delta iota is considered a monotonic increasing function of the person's measure beta nu. This is also unlike the unfolding framework, where the probability of a positive response is maximum when beta nu = delta iota, and monotonically decreases as magnitude of beta nu-delta iota approaches infinity. The method involves four steps. In Step 1, items are scaled by the Rasch model for paired comparisons to produce a variable definition. These scale values serve as a basis for Steps 2 and 4. In Step 2, the nonadditive conjoint system is restructured to additive. The quantitative hypothesis of the restructured data is tested by the axioms of conjoint measurement theory in Step 3. This data is then analyzed by the Rasch rating scale model in Step 4 to evaluate individual response combinations, using the Step 1 item calibrations as anchors. The method was applied to simulated person responses of the Schedule of Recent Events (Holmes and Rahe, 1967). The results suggest that the method is useful and effective. It scales items with a robust method of paired comparisons, ensures additivity and quantification of the conjoint person-item matrix, produces a reasonable ordering of person measures from the perspective of individual response combinations, and provides satisfactory person and item separation (i.e., reliability). Furthermore, the restructured data reproduces SRE item scale values obtained by paired comparisons in Step 1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信