利用多面Rasch模型的团队评估。

Journal of outcome measurement Pub Date : 1998-01-01
J M Allen, R E Schumacker
{"title":"利用多面Rasch模型的团队评估。","authors":"J M Allen,&nbsp;R E Schumacker","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As organizations begin to implement work teams, their assessment will ultimately reflect compensation strategies that move away from individual assessment. This will involve not only using multiple raters, but also the use of multiple criteria. Team assessment using multiple raters and multiple criteria is therefore necessitated; however, this can produce differences in ratings due to the leniency or severity of the individual team raters. This study analyzed the ratings of individual members on 31 different teams across 12 different criteria of team performance. Utilizing the many-facet Rasch model, statistical differences between the teams and 12 criteria were calculated.</p>","PeriodicalId":79673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of outcome measurement","volume":"2 2","pages":"142-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Team assessment utilizing a many-facet Rasch model.\",\"authors\":\"J M Allen,&nbsp;R E Schumacker\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As organizations begin to implement work teams, their assessment will ultimately reflect compensation strategies that move away from individual assessment. This will involve not only using multiple raters, but also the use of multiple criteria. Team assessment using multiple raters and multiple criteria is therefore necessitated; however, this can produce differences in ratings due to the leniency or severity of the individual team raters. This study analyzed the ratings of individual members on 31 different teams across 12 different criteria of team performance. Utilizing the many-facet Rasch model, statistical differences between the teams and 12 criteria were calculated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of outcome measurement\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"142-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of outcome measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of outcome measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当组织开始实现工作团队时,他们的评估将最终反映出远离个人评估的补偿策略。这不仅涉及使用多个评级机构,还涉及使用多个标准。因此,需要使用多个评分者和多个标准进行团队评估;然而,这可能会由于个别团队评分者的宽容或严厉而产生评分差异。这项研究分析了31个不同团队的成员在12种不同的团队绩效标准下的评分。利用多面Rasch模型,计算了团队和12个标准之间的统计差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Team assessment utilizing a many-facet Rasch model.

As organizations begin to implement work teams, their assessment will ultimately reflect compensation strategies that move away from individual assessment. This will involve not only using multiple raters, but also the use of multiple criteria. Team assessment using multiple raters and multiple criteria is therefore necessitated; however, this can produce differences in ratings due to the leniency or severity of the individual team raters. This study analyzed the ratings of individual members on 31 different teams across 12 different criteria of team performance. Utilizing the many-facet Rasch model, statistical differences between the teams and 12 criteria were calculated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信