血液透析(HD)中血管通路的并发症——老年患者与成人患者。

E J Grapsa, A P Paraskevopoulos, S P Moutafis, A J Vourliotou, N J Papadoyannakis, G E Digenis, N J Zerefos
{"title":"血液透析(HD)中血管通路的并发症——老年患者与成人患者。","authors":"E J Grapsa,&nbsp;A P Paraskevopoulos,&nbsp;S P Moutafis,&nbsp;A J Vourliotou,&nbsp;N J Papadoyannakis,&nbsp;G E Digenis,&nbsp;N J Zerefos","doi":"10.1023/a:1008242100893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reports on the success of permanent vascular access in elderly HD patients vary considerably. We reviewed the records of 149 patients [62F and 87M] aged 20-89 years old (median 59) who were on hemodialysis for 6-242 (49 median) months, and had undergone 202 vascular access procedures (177 Cimmino-Brescia fistulae and 25 PTFE grafts). Patients were divided into two groups according to the age they started HD. Group A: 48 patients, over 60 years old (range 60-83; median 70) on HD for 43.5, (6-140) months. Group B: 101 patients, under 60 years old, range (15-59) median 46, on HD for 54 (6-242) months. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of gender, primary renal disease, (except polycystic kidney disease), Hct and EPO administration. The initial choice of vascular access, the complications and the technique survival were examined in both groups. Cimmino-Brescia fistulae were used as the first choice of vascular access in all patients except one in group B. PTFE-grafts were the second or third choice in 7/48 (group A) and 15/101 (group B) (p: NS). The only reason for technique failure was vascular thrombosis in both groups (11/48 group A and 31/101 group B p: NS). Other complications were: aneurysms (10/48 and 14/101, p: NS), infections (0/48 and 2/101 p: NS) and edema (0/48 and 6/101, p: NS). Five-year technique survival of the first AV fistula in the two groups was 35% and 45% respectively (log-rank test, p: NS). These findings suggest that: a) A.V. fistula is the first choice of vascular access in aged HD patients; b) There is no difference in vascular access complications across age groups; c) Survival of the first A.V. fistula is independent of age.</p>","PeriodicalId":79490,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric nephrology and urology","volume":"8 1","pages":"21-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1008242100893","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complications of vascular access in hemodialysis (HD)--aged vs adult patients.\",\"authors\":\"E J Grapsa,&nbsp;A P Paraskevopoulos,&nbsp;S P Moutafis,&nbsp;A J Vourliotou,&nbsp;N J Papadoyannakis,&nbsp;G E Digenis,&nbsp;N J Zerefos\",\"doi\":\"10.1023/a:1008242100893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Reports on the success of permanent vascular access in elderly HD patients vary considerably. We reviewed the records of 149 patients [62F and 87M] aged 20-89 years old (median 59) who were on hemodialysis for 6-242 (49 median) months, and had undergone 202 vascular access procedures (177 Cimmino-Brescia fistulae and 25 PTFE grafts). Patients were divided into two groups according to the age they started HD. Group A: 48 patients, over 60 years old (range 60-83; median 70) on HD for 43.5, (6-140) months. Group B: 101 patients, under 60 years old, range (15-59) median 46, on HD for 54 (6-242) months. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of gender, primary renal disease, (except polycystic kidney disease), Hct and EPO administration. The initial choice of vascular access, the complications and the technique survival were examined in both groups. Cimmino-Brescia fistulae were used as the first choice of vascular access in all patients except one in group B. PTFE-grafts were the second or third choice in 7/48 (group A) and 15/101 (group B) (p: NS). The only reason for technique failure was vascular thrombosis in both groups (11/48 group A and 31/101 group B p: NS). Other complications were: aneurysms (10/48 and 14/101, p: NS), infections (0/48 and 2/101 p: NS) and edema (0/48 and 6/101, p: NS). Five-year technique survival of the first AV fistula in the two groups was 35% and 45% respectively (log-rank test, p: NS). These findings suggest that: a) A.V. fistula is the first choice of vascular access in aged HD patients; b) There is no difference in vascular access complications across age groups; c) Survival of the first A.V. fistula is independent of age.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geriatric nephrology and urology\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"21-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1008242100893\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geriatric nephrology and urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008242100893\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric nephrology and urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008242100893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

关于老年HD患者永久血管通路成功的报道差异很大。我们回顾了149例患者[62F和87M],年龄20-89岁(中位数59),接受血液透析6-242(中位数49)个月,并进行了202次血管通路手术(177例Cimmino-Brescia瘘管和25例PTFE移植)。患者根据开始患HD的年龄分为两组。A组48例,年龄60岁以上(60-83岁;中位数为70),持续43.5个月(6-140个月)。B组:101例患者,年龄小于60岁,范围(15-59),中位46,HD治疗54(6-242)个月。两组在性别、原发性肾脏疾病(多囊肾病除外)、Hct和EPO给药方面没有差异。观察两组患者血管通路的初始选择、并发症及手术存活率。除B组1例患者外,其余患者均以Cimmino-Brescia瘘作为首选血管通路。7/48 (A组)和15/101 (B组)患者以ptfe移植物为第二或第三选择(p: NS)。两组技术失败的唯一原因均为血管血栓形成(A组11/48,B组31/101 p: NS)。其他并发症有:动脉瘤(10/48和14/101,p: NS)、感染(0/48和2/101 p: NS)和水肿(0/48和6/101,p: NS)。两组首次房内瘘的5年技术生存率分别为35%和45% (log-rank检验,p: NS)。上述结果提示:a)静脉瘘是老年HD患者血管通路的首选;b)不同年龄组的血管通路并发症无差异;c)第一例静脉瘘的存活与年龄无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Complications of vascular access in hemodialysis (HD)--aged vs adult patients.

Reports on the success of permanent vascular access in elderly HD patients vary considerably. We reviewed the records of 149 patients [62F and 87M] aged 20-89 years old (median 59) who were on hemodialysis for 6-242 (49 median) months, and had undergone 202 vascular access procedures (177 Cimmino-Brescia fistulae and 25 PTFE grafts). Patients were divided into two groups according to the age they started HD. Group A: 48 patients, over 60 years old (range 60-83; median 70) on HD for 43.5, (6-140) months. Group B: 101 patients, under 60 years old, range (15-59) median 46, on HD for 54 (6-242) months. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of gender, primary renal disease, (except polycystic kidney disease), Hct and EPO administration. The initial choice of vascular access, the complications and the technique survival were examined in both groups. Cimmino-Brescia fistulae were used as the first choice of vascular access in all patients except one in group B. PTFE-grafts were the second or third choice in 7/48 (group A) and 15/101 (group B) (p: NS). The only reason for technique failure was vascular thrombosis in both groups (11/48 group A and 31/101 group B p: NS). Other complications were: aneurysms (10/48 and 14/101, p: NS), infections (0/48 and 2/101 p: NS) and edema (0/48 and 6/101, p: NS). Five-year technique survival of the first AV fistula in the two groups was 35% and 45% respectively (log-rank test, p: NS). These findings suggest that: a) A.V. fistula is the first choice of vascular access in aged HD patients; b) There is no difference in vascular access complications across age groups; c) Survival of the first A.V. fistula is independent of age.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信