大鼠剖腹手术后肠粘连的预防——一项随机前瞻性研究

G Zamir, A I Bloom, P Reissman
{"title":"大鼠剖腹手术后肠粘连的预防——一项随机前瞻性研究","authors":"G Zamir,&nbsp;A I Bloom,&nbsp;P Reissman","doi":"10.1007/s004330050083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We prospectively studied the effect of a foam composite containing glycerin, propylene glycol, polyol, stearine, stearate and silicone oil, which is known to form a temporary barrier layer when applied to epithelial surface, on adhesion prevention in rats. The small intestine abrasion model was used for creation of adhesions. Sixty male Sabra rats of a mean weight of 295 +/- 23 g were randomly assigned into four groups: group 1 (n = 20) underwent laparotomy and abrasion; group 2 (n = 20) underwent laparotomy, abrasion and intraperitoneal instillation of the foam composite; group 3 (n = 10) underwent laparotomy with abrasion and a second laparotomy with adhesiolysis 2 weeks later; and group 4 (n = 10), was treated in the same way as group 3 but during the second laparotomy the foam composite was instilled intraperitoneally. All animals were relaparotomized 2 weeks (groups 1 and 2) and 4 weeks (groups 3 and 4) after the initial laparotomy for adhesion scoring performed by a blinded independent investigator using the standard 0-3 adhesion grading score. Representative specimens of small intestine and liver from animals in groups 2 and 4 were analyzed. A significantly lower mean adhesion score was noted in group 2 (1.15 +/- 0.3) compared with that of group 1 (2.65 +/- 0.1) or group 3 (2.60 +/- 0.1) (P < 0.01). Group 4 had a significantly lower score (1.4 +/- 0.3) than group 3 or group 1 (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the mean adhesion score between groups 1 and 3. Histological examination revealed no evidence of residual foam composite or adverse reaction to its use in the intestine and liver. The foam composite tested may reduce the severity of intestinal adhesions after laparotomy and may also reduce the severity of recurrent adhesions after adhesiolysis. Intraperitoneal use of this composite is safe in rats. The exact mechanism of action is unclear but may be related to the formation of a temporary microlayer that coats the injured surface of the intestine and facilitates healing without adhesion formation. Further investigation is needed to evaluate its full potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":76421,"journal":{"name":"Research in experimental medicine. Zeitschrift fur die gesamte experimentelle Medizin einschliesslich experimenteller Chirurgie","volume":"197 6","pages":"349-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s004330050083","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevention of intestinal adhesions after laparotomy in a rat model--a randomized prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"G Zamir,&nbsp;A I Bloom,&nbsp;P Reissman\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s004330050083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We prospectively studied the effect of a foam composite containing glycerin, propylene glycol, polyol, stearine, stearate and silicone oil, which is known to form a temporary barrier layer when applied to epithelial surface, on adhesion prevention in rats. The small intestine abrasion model was used for creation of adhesions. Sixty male Sabra rats of a mean weight of 295 +/- 23 g were randomly assigned into four groups: group 1 (n = 20) underwent laparotomy and abrasion; group 2 (n = 20) underwent laparotomy, abrasion and intraperitoneal instillation of the foam composite; group 3 (n = 10) underwent laparotomy with abrasion and a second laparotomy with adhesiolysis 2 weeks later; and group 4 (n = 10), was treated in the same way as group 3 but during the second laparotomy the foam composite was instilled intraperitoneally. All animals were relaparotomized 2 weeks (groups 1 and 2) and 4 weeks (groups 3 and 4) after the initial laparotomy for adhesion scoring performed by a blinded independent investigator using the standard 0-3 adhesion grading score. Representative specimens of small intestine and liver from animals in groups 2 and 4 were analyzed. A significantly lower mean adhesion score was noted in group 2 (1.15 +/- 0.3) compared with that of group 1 (2.65 +/- 0.1) or group 3 (2.60 +/- 0.1) (P < 0.01). Group 4 had a significantly lower score (1.4 +/- 0.3) than group 3 or group 1 (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the mean adhesion score between groups 1 and 3. Histological examination revealed no evidence of residual foam composite or adverse reaction to its use in the intestine and liver. The foam composite tested may reduce the severity of intestinal adhesions after laparotomy and may also reduce the severity of recurrent adhesions after adhesiolysis. Intraperitoneal use of this composite is safe in rats. The exact mechanism of action is unclear but may be related to the formation of a temporary microlayer that coats the injured surface of the intestine and facilitates healing without adhesion formation. Further investigation is needed to evaluate its full potential.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in experimental medicine. Zeitschrift fur die gesamte experimentelle Medizin einschliesslich experimenteller Chirurgie\",\"volume\":\"197 6\",\"pages\":\"349-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s004330050083\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in experimental medicine. Zeitschrift fur die gesamte experimentelle Medizin einschliesslich experimenteller Chirurgie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s004330050083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in experimental medicine. Zeitschrift fur die gesamte experimentelle Medizin einschliesslich experimenteller Chirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s004330050083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

我们前瞻性研究了含有甘油、丙二醇、多元醇、硬脂酸、硬脂酸酯和硅油的泡沫复合材料在大鼠上皮表面形成临时屏障层时对粘连的预防作用。采用小肠磨损模型建立粘连。选取平均体重295 +/- 23 g的雄性Sabra大鼠60只,随机分为4组:1组(n = 20)开腹磨擦;第二组(n = 20)行开腹、擦伤、腹腔内灌注泡沫复合材料;第3组(n = 10)于2周后行磨耗性开腹手术,第二次开腹并粘连松解;第4组(n = 10)采用与第3组相同的治疗方法,但在第二次剖腹手术时腹腔内灌注泡沫复合材料。所有动物在首次开腹后2周(第1组和第2组)和4周(第3组和第4组)再次开腹,由盲法独立研究者使用标准的0-3级粘连评分进行粘连评分。对第2组和第4组动物的代表性小肠和肝脏标本进行分析。2组平均粘连评分(1.15 +/- 0.3)显著低于1组(2.65 +/- 0.1)和3组(2.60 +/- 0.1)(P < 0.01)。4组的评分(1.4 +/- 0.3)显著低于3组和1组(P < 0.05)。1组与3组的平均粘连评分比较,差异无统计学意义。组织学检查未发现残留泡沫复合物或其在肠道和肝脏使用的不良反应的证据。所测泡沫复合材料可降低剖腹手术后肠粘连的严重程度,也可降低粘连松解后复发性粘连的严重程度。在大鼠中腹腔注射这种复合物是安全的。确切的作用机制尚不清楚,但可能与临时微层的形成有关,微层覆盖在受伤的肠道表面,促进愈合而不形成粘连。需要进一步调查以评价其全部潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevention of intestinal adhesions after laparotomy in a rat model--a randomized prospective study.

We prospectively studied the effect of a foam composite containing glycerin, propylene glycol, polyol, stearine, stearate and silicone oil, which is known to form a temporary barrier layer when applied to epithelial surface, on adhesion prevention in rats. The small intestine abrasion model was used for creation of adhesions. Sixty male Sabra rats of a mean weight of 295 +/- 23 g were randomly assigned into four groups: group 1 (n = 20) underwent laparotomy and abrasion; group 2 (n = 20) underwent laparotomy, abrasion and intraperitoneal instillation of the foam composite; group 3 (n = 10) underwent laparotomy with abrasion and a second laparotomy with adhesiolysis 2 weeks later; and group 4 (n = 10), was treated in the same way as group 3 but during the second laparotomy the foam composite was instilled intraperitoneally. All animals were relaparotomized 2 weeks (groups 1 and 2) and 4 weeks (groups 3 and 4) after the initial laparotomy for adhesion scoring performed by a blinded independent investigator using the standard 0-3 adhesion grading score. Representative specimens of small intestine and liver from animals in groups 2 and 4 were analyzed. A significantly lower mean adhesion score was noted in group 2 (1.15 +/- 0.3) compared with that of group 1 (2.65 +/- 0.1) or group 3 (2.60 +/- 0.1) (P < 0.01). Group 4 had a significantly lower score (1.4 +/- 0.3) than group 3 or group 1 (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the mean adhesion score between groups 1 and 3. Histological examination revealed no evidence of residual foam composite or adverse reaction to its use in the intestine and liver. The foam composite tested may reduce the severity of intestinal adhesions after laparotomy and may also reduce the severity of recurrent adhesions after adhesiolysis. Intraperitoneal use of this composite is safe in rats. The exact mechanism of action is unclear but may be related to the formation of a temporary microlayer that coats the injured surface of the intestine and facilitates healing without adhesion formation. Further investigation is needed to evaluate its full potential.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信