W J McLaughlin, R B Schifman, K J Ryan, G M Manriquez, A K Bhattacharyya, B E Dunn, R S Weinstein
{"title":"远程微生物学:可行性研究。","authors":"W J McLaughlin, R B Schifman, K J Ryan, G M Manriquez, A K Bhattacharyya, B E Dunn, R S Weinstein","doi":"10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rural hospitals generally lack staffing with infectious disease specialists or pathologists. Without on-site pathologists, the range of microbiology services offered by clinical laboratories may be limited as well.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the feasibility of using static-image telepathology to evaluate Gram stains of microbiologic preparations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective feasibility study, three pathologists evaluated Gram stains of slides from 50 cases by two viewing modalities: static-image telepathology and conventional light microscopy. Digital video images of slides were captured at two magnifications (using 40x and 100x objective lenses) at 1024 x 768 x 24-bit color and transmitted over standard telephone lines at 14,400 kbps. Pathology reports and culture results served as \"truth diagnoses.\" Categories of interpretations were correct, minor discrepancy, or major discrepancy with regard to the implications for patient care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The diagnostic accuracy of video image readings and conventional light microscopy readings were nearly identical, with no statistically significant differences in the performances of specialty and nonspecialty pathologists (P > 0.05). The mean accuracies of readings of the video images and light microscopy images were 95.3% and 95.4%, respectively. Taking into account the time required by a referring pathologist to capture video digital images, telemicrobiology was somewhat less efficient than conventional light microscopy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pathologists can accurately evaluate digital video images of preselected fields on Gram-stained slides. In clinical practice, however, a limiting factor may be the availability of local personnel qualified to select the microscopic fields for evaluation by telepathologists. The adequacy of the video images suggests that telepathology may also be used for remote supervision of quality assurance programs in microbiology laboratories, as well as for remote proficiency training of laboratory personnel.</p>","PeriodicalId":79734,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":"4 1","pages":"11-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.11","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telemicrobiology: feasibility study.\",\"authors\":\"W J McLaughlin, R B Schifman, K J Ryan, G M Manriquez, A K Bhattacharyya, B E Dunn, R S Weinstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rural hospitals generally lack staffing with infectious disease specialists or pathologists. Without on-site pathologists, the range of microbiology services offered by clinical laboratories may be limited as well.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the feasibility of using static-image telepathology to evaluate Gram stains of microbiologic preparations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective feasibility study, three pathologists evaluated Gram stains of slides from 50 cases by two viewing modalities: static-image telepathology and conventional light microscopy. Digital video images of slides were captured at two magnifications (using 40x and 100x objective lenses) at 1024 x 768 x 24-bit color and transmitted over standard telephone lines at 14,400 kbps. Pathology reports and culture results served as \\\"truth diagnoses.\\\" Categories of interpretations were correct, minor discrepancy, or major discrepancy with regard to the implications for patient care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The diagnostic accuracy of video image readings and conventional light microscopy readings were nearly identical, with no statistically significant differences in the performances of specialty and nonspecialty pathologists (P > 0.05). The mean accuracies of readings of the video images and light microscopy images were 95.3% and 95.4%, respectively. Taking into account the time required by a referring pathologist to capture video digital images, telemicrobiology was somewhat less efficient than conventional light microscopy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pathologists can accurately evaluate digital video images of preselected fields on Gram-stained slides. In clinical practice, however, a limiting factor may be the availability of local personnel qualified to select the microscopic fields for evaluation by telepathologists. The adequacy of the video images suggests that telepathology may also be used for remote supervision of quality assurance programs in microbiology laboratories, as well as for remote proficiency training of laboratory personnel.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"11-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.11\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33
摘要
背景:农村医院普遍缺乏配备传染病专家或病理学家。没有现场病理学家,临床实验室提供的微生物学服务范围也可能有限。目的:探讨静态图像远程病理学评价微生物制剂革兰氏染色的可行性。材料和方法:在这项回顾性可行性研究中,三位病理学家通过静态图像远程病理学和常规光学显微镜两种观察方式评估了50例载玻片的革兰氏染色。幻灯片的数字视频图像以两种放大率(使用40倍和100倍物镜)捕获,颜色为1024 x 768 x 24位,并通过标准电话线以14,400 kbps传输。病理报告和培养结果作为“真实诊断”。解释的类别是正确的,轻微的差异,或主要的差异,关于病人护理的含义。结果:视频影像读数与常规光镜读数的诊断准确率基本一致,专科病理医师与非专科病理医师的表现差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。视频图像和光学显微镜图像的平均读数准确率分别为95.3%和95.4%。考虑到转诊病理学家捕获视频数字图像所需的时间,远程微生物学的效率略低于传统光学显微镜。结论:病理学家可以准确地评估革兰氏染色载玻片上预选区域的数字视频图像。然而,在临床实践中,一个限制因素可能是当地合格人员的可用性,以选择显微镜领域供心灵病理学家评估。视频图像的充分性表明,心灵病理学也可用于微生物实验室质量保证计划的远程监督,以及实验室人员的远程熟练培训。
Background: Rural hospitals generally lack staffing with infectious disease specialists or pathologists. Without on-site pathologists, the range of microbiology services offered by clinical laboratories may be limited as well.
Objective: To study the feasibility of using static-image telepathology to evaluate Gram stains of microbiologic preparations.
Materials and methods: In this retrospective feasibility study, three pathologists evaluated Gram stains of slides from 50 cases by two viewing modalities: static-image telepathology and conventional light microscopy. Digital video images of slides were captured at two magnifications (using 40x and 100x objective lenses) at 1024 x 768 x 24-bit color and transmitted over standard telephone lines at 14,400 kbps. Pathology reports and culture results served as "truth diagnoses." Categories of interpretations were correct, minor discrepancy, or major discrepancy with regard to the implications for patient care.
Results: The diagnostic accuracy of video image readings and conventional light microscopy readings were nearly identical, with no statistically significant differences in the performances of specialty and nonspecialty pathologists (P > 0.05). The mean accuracies of readings of the video images and light microscopy images were 95.3% and 95.4%, respectively. Taking into account the time required by a referring pathologist to capture video digital images, telemicrobiology was somewhat less efficient than conventional light microscopy.
Conclusions: Pathologists can accurately evaluate digital video images of preselected fields on Gram-stained slides. In clinical practice, however, a limiting factor may be the availability of local personnel qualified to select the microscopic fields for evaluation by telepathologists. The adequacy of the video images suggests that telepathology may also be used for remote supervision of quality assurance programs in microbiology laboratories, as well as for remote proficiency training of laboratory personnel.