改善重症监护病房的临终关怀:从结果研究中学到什么?

New horizons (Baltimore, Md.) Pub Date : 1998-02-01
M Danis
{"title":"改善重症监护病房的临终关怀:从结果研究中学到什么?","authors":"M Danis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current recommendations about the care of dying patients advise that healthcare professionals understand and respect the goals, priorities, needs, and suffering of each dying patient and have command of the skills and resources required to address these concerns. Studies of important features of terminal illness, current use and outcome of intensive care for the terminally ill, and interventions designed to improve the outcome of care for patients who die in ICUs are reviewed to examine discrepancies between recommendations and the reality of ICU care for dying patients. Evidence indicates that it is difficult to predict the time of death or determine patient preferences about treatment prior to death. The utilization of intensive care prior to death varies widely across the United States and is a function of available resources more than individual patient need or choice. The pattern of withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment also varies widely and does not seem to follow guidelines. Families of deceased patients report that care could be improved by increased attention to analgesia and communication. The largest interventional study, the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment (SUPPORT), which provided physicians with information about patient prognosis and preferences for care, did not alter outcomes of end-of-life care. Smaller but successful interventional studies have included examination of an alternative team that provides care tailored to the needs of dying patients, a service tailored to promote family contact with the dying patient, and proactive consultation to facilitate care planning and communication with families. Research suggests that clinicians should be cognizant of the difficulty of predicting death and anticipate the need to change the goals of care as therapeutic trials fail; anticipate and treat bothersome symptoms of dying patients; recognize that family support and contact between the dying patient and family facilitate decision-making and acceptance of death; and facilitate the coordination of care and the development of alternative care teams in order to optimize end-of-life care.</p>","PeriodicalId":79357,"journal":{"name":"New horizons (Baltimore, Md.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: what's to be learned from outcomes research?\",\"authors\":\"M Danis\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Current recommendations about the care of dying patients advise that healthcare professionals understand and respect the goals, priorities, needs, and suffering of each dying patient and have command of the skills and resources required to address these concerns. Studies of important features of terminal illness, current use and outcome of intensive care for the terminally ill, and interventions designed to improve the outcome of care for patients who die in ICUs are reviewed to examine discrepancies between recommendations and the reality of ICU care for dying patients. Evidence indicates that it is difficult to predict the time of death or determine patient preferences about treatment prior to death. The utilization of intensive care prior to death varies widely across the United States and is a function of available resources more than individual patient need or choice. The pattern of withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment also varies widely and does not seem to follow guidelines. Families of deceased patients report that care could be improved by increased attention to analgesia and communication. The largest interventional study, the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment (SUPPORT), which provided physicians with information about patient prognosis and preferences for care, did not alter outcomes of end-of-life care. Smaller but successful interventional studies have included examination of an alternative team that provides care tailored to the needs of dying patients, a service tailored to promote family contact with the dying patient, and proactive consultation to facilitate care planning and communication with families. Research suggests that clinicians should be cognizant of the difficulty of predicting death and anticipate the need to change the goals of care as therapeutic trials fail; anticipate and treat bothersome symptoms of dying patients; recognize that family support and contact between the dying patient and family facilitate decision-making and acceptance of death; and facilitate the coordination of care and the development of alternative care teams in order to optimize end-of-life care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New horizons (Baltimore, Md.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New horizons (Baltimore, Md.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New horizons (Baltimore, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前关于临终病人护理的建议建议,卫生保健专业人员了解并尊重每个临终病人的目标、优先事项、需求和痛苦,并掌握解决这些问题所需的技能和资源。本文回顾了绝症的重要特征、临终患者重症监护的当前使用和结果,以及旨在改善ICU中死亡患者护理结果的干预措施的研究,以检查建议与临终患者ICU护理现实之间的差异。有证据表明,很难预测死亡时间或确定患者对死亡前治疗的偏好。死亡前重症监护的利用在美国各地差别很大,是可用资源的功能,而不是个体患者的需要或选择。维持生命治疗的停药模式也差异很大,似乎不遵循指南。死者家属报告说,可以通过增加对镇痛和沟通的关注来改善护理。最大的介入研究,了解预后和治疗结果和风险偏好的研究(SUPPORT),为医生提供了有关患者预后和护理偏好的信息,并没有改变临终护理的结果。较小但成功的介入性研究包括检查另一个团队,该团队根据临终病人的需要提供量身定制的护理,为促进临终病人的家属联系提供量身定制的服务,以及为促进护理计划和与家属沟通提供主动咨询。研究表明,临床医生应该认识到预测死亡的困难,并预期在治疗试验失败时需要改变护理目标;预测和治疗垂死病人的恼人症状;认识到家属的支持和临终病人与家属之间的接触有助于作出决定和接受死亡;促进护理的协调和替代护理团队的发展,以优化临终关怀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: what's to be learned from outcomes research?

Current recommendations about the care of dying patients advise that healthcare professionals understand and respect the goals, priorities, needs, and suffering of each dying patient and have command of the skills and resources required to address these concerns. Studies of important features of terminal illness, current use and outcome of intensive care for the terminally ill, and interventions designed to improve the outcome of care for patients who die in ICUs are reviewed to examine discrepancies between recommendations and the reality of ICU care for dying patients. Evidence indicates that it is difficult to predict the time of death or determine patient preferences about treatment prior to death. The utilization of intensive care prior to death varies widely across the United States and is a function of available resources more than individual patient need or choice. The pattern of withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment also varies widely and does not seem to follow guidelines. Families of deceased patients report that care could be improved by increased attention to analgesia and communication. The largest interventional study, the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment (SUPPORT), which provided physicians with information about patient prognosis and preferences for care, did not alter outcomes of end-of-life care. Smaller but successful interventional studies have included examination of an alternative team that provides care tailored to the needs of dying patients, a service tailored to promote family contact with the dying patient, and proactive consultation to facilitate care planning and communication with families. Research suggests that clinicians should be cognizant of the difficulty of predicting death and anticipate the need to change the goals of care as therapeutic trials fail; anticipate and treat bothersome symptoms of dying patients; recognize that family support and contact between the dying patient and family facilitate decision-making and acceptance of death; and facilitate the coordination of care and the development of alternative care teams in order to optimize end-of-life care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信