在科学会议上使用全尺寸患者模拟器进行大量单独会议的后勤工作。

S Lampotang, M L Good, R Westhorpe, J Hardcastle, R G Carovano
{"title":"在科学会议上使用全尺寸患者模拟器进行大量单独会议的后勤工作。","authors":"S Lampotang,&nbsp;M L Good,&nbsp;R Westhorpe,&nbsp;J Hardcastle,&nbsp;R G Carovano","doi":"10.1023/a:1007447510839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To design and implement the logistics of accommodating a large number of participants in individual, hands-on sessions on a full-scale patient simulator during a major scientific meeting or continuing medical education course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used our method during the 11th World Congress of Anaesthesiologists in Sydney, Australia to facilitate studying the impact of pulse oximetry and capnography on the time taken by anesthesiologists to correctly identify critical incidents on a full-scale patient simulator. Each study participant spent 15 minutes in 4 sections of the study area: the anesthesia and monitoring equipment briefing room, the simulator briefing room, the simulation room and the debriefing room.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 113 participants during five days (15 during instructor training and 25, 23, 24 and 26 on subsequent exhibit days). We were oversubscribed daily. However, there were 9 no-shows during the 4 days of the study, which generated a participant absence rate of 9.2%. The average number of participants over the 4 days of the study was 24.5 per day compared to our capacity of 27 per day. The feedback we obtained from the participants about the simulation experience and the format of the exercise was positive and enthusiastic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have developed a practical and viable method that can be adapted for use at scientific meetings and courses, which improves accessibility of individual, hands-on sessions on full-scale patient simulators to a larger audience than previously attainable. Our method is applicable for continuing medical education courses as well as research purposes in the form of prospective studies during scientific meetings and courses.</p>","PeriodicalId":77199,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical monitoring","volume":"13 6","pages":"399-407"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1007447510839","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Logistics of conducting a large number of individual sessions with a full-scale patient simulator at a scientific meeting.\",\"authors\":\"S Lampotang,&nbsp;M L Good,&nbsp;R Westhorpe,&nbsp;J Hardcastle,&nbsp;R G Carovano\",\"doi\":\"10.1023/a:1007447510839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To design and implement the logistics of accommodating a large number of participants in individual, hands-on sessions on a full-scale patient simulator during a major scientific meeting or continuing medical education course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used our method during the 11th World Congress of Anaesthesiologists in Sydney, Australia to facilitate studying the impact of pulse oximetry and capnography on the time taken by anesthesiologists to correctly identify critical incidents on a full-scale patient simulator. Each study participant spent 15 minutes in 4 sections of the study area: the anesthesia and monitoring equipment briefing room, the simulator briefing room, the simulation room and the debriefing room.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 113 participants during five days (15 during instructor training and 25, 23, 24 and 26 on subsequent exhibit days). We were oversubscribed daily. However, there were 9 no-shows during the 4 days of the study, which generated a participant absence rate of 9.2%. The average number of participants over the 4 days of the study was 24.5 per day compared to our capacity of 27 per day. The feedback we obtained from the participants about the simulation experience and the format of the exercise was positive and enthusiastic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have developed a practical and viable method that can be adapted for use at scientific meetings and courses, which improves accessibility of individual, hands-on sessions on full-scale patient simulators to a larger audience than previously attainable. Our method is applicable for continuing medical education courses as well as research purposes in the form of prospective studies during scientific meetings and courses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical monitoring\",\"volume\":\"13 6\",\"pages\":\"399-407\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1007447510839\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical monitoring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007447510839\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007447510839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

目的:设计和实施在重大科学会议或继续医学教育课程期间,在全尺寸患者模拟器上容纳大量参与者的个人实践会议的后勤。方法:我们在澳大利亚悉尼举行的第11届世界麻醉师大会上使用了我们的方法,以方便研究脉搏血氧仪和血管造影对麻醉师在全尺寸患者模拟器上正确识别危重事件所需时间的影响。每位研究参与者在麻醉及监护设备说明室、模拟器说明室、模拟室和说明室4个研究区域度过15分钟。结果:5天共113名参与者,其中指导员培训期间15名,后续展览日25、23、24、26名。我们每天都被超额认购。然而,在研究的4天里,有9人没有出现,这使得参与者的缺勤率达到了9.2%。在为期4天的研究中,参与者的平均人数是每天24.5人,而我们的能力是每天27人。参加者对模拟体验和演习形式的反馈是积极和热情的。结论:我们已经开发出一种实用可行的方法,可以用于科学会议和课程,这提高了个人的可访问性,全尺寸患者模拟器的动手会议比以前可以达到的更多的观众。我们的方法适用于继续医学教育课程,也适用于科学会议和课程中前瞻性研究的研究目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Logistics of conducting a large number of individual sessions with a full-scale patient simulator at a scientific meeting.

Objective: To design and implement the logistics of accommodating a large number of participants in individual, hands-on sessions on a full-scale patient simulator during a major scientific meeting or continuing medical education course.

Methods: We used our method during the 11th World Congress of Anaesthesiologists in Sydney, Australia to facilitate studying the impact of pulse oximetry and capnography on the time taken by anesthesiologists to correctly identify critical incidents on a full-scale patient simulator. Each study participant spent 15 minutes in 4 sections of the study area: the anesthesia and monitoring equipment briefing room, the simulator briefing room, the simulation room and the debriefing room.

Results: There were 113 participants during five days (15 during instructor training and 25, 23, 24 and 26 on subsequent exhibit days). We were oversubscribed daily. However, there were 9 no-shows during the 4 days of the study, which generated a participant absence rate of 9.2%. The average number of participants over the 4 days of the study was 24.5 per day compared to our capacity of 27 per day. The feedback we obtained from the participants about the simulation experience and the format of the exercise was positive and enthusiastic.

Conclusions: We have developed a practical and viable method that can be adapted for use at scientific meetings and courses, which improves accessibility of individual, hands-on sessions on full-scale patient simulators to a larger audience than previously attainable. Our method is applicable for continuing medical education courses as well as research purposes in the form of prospective studies during scientific meetings and courses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信