K Takabe, Y Tsukada, T Shimizu, J Takagiwa, M Hirayama, M Nakayama, H Miura, H Akabane, S Takayama, S Aida
{"title":"支气管肺泡灌洗液中石棉体计数的临床应用","authors":"K Takabe, Y Tsukada, T Shimizu, J Takagiwa, M Hirayama, M Nakayama, H Miura, H Akabane, S Takayama, S Aida","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To assess the clinical utility of measuring the number of asbestos bodies (AB) present in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), we counted the number of AB in BALF from 119 subjects using light microscopy. The results were analyzed according to occupational histories, radiological findings of asbestos-induced lung and pleural changes, and asbestos-related diseases. The 94 subjects in group 1 had a history of dust exposure, whereas group 2 subjects (n = 25) had no dust exposure. Group 1 was subdivided into subjects with obvious exposure to asbestos (group 1A, n = 61), and subjects with no known exposure to asbestos (group 1B, n = 33). The distribution of AB counts per ml of BALF (means +/- SEM) differed significantly between groups 1 and 2 (38.8 +/- 17.4 vs 0.06 +/- 0.04, p < 0.0001). The AB counts were significantly different between groups 1A and 1B (57.9 +/- 26.6 vs 3.4 +/- 1.2, p = 0.01). Subject, exposed to dust who had radiological evidence of pleural thickening had significantly higher AB counts than subjects in whom pleural thickening was absent (66.0 +/- 31.1 vs 5.1 +/- 4.2, p = 0.03). In group 1, the BALF was positive for AB in 7 of 14 patients with pulmonary fibrosis, 4 of 5 patients with lung cancer, all 6 patients with malignant mesothelioma, and all 4 patients with benign asbestos pleural effusion. We conclude that AB counts in BALF are useful for evaluating both the history of asbestos exposure in a population exposed to dust, as well as patients having asbestos-related diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":19255,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai zasshi","volume":"35 11","pages":"1196-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The clinical utility of asbestos body counts in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid].\",\"authors\":\"K Takabe, Y Tsukada, T Shimizu, J Takagiwa, M Hirayama, M Nakayama, H Miura, H Akabane, S Takayama, S Aida\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To assess the clinical utility of measuring the number of asbestos bodies (AB) present in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), we counted the number of AB in BALF from 119 subjects using light microscopy. The results were analyzed according to occupational histories, radiological findings of asbestos-induced lung and pleural changes, and asbestos-related diseases. The 94 subjects in group 1 had a history of dust exposure, whereas group 2 subjects (n = 25) had no dust exposure. Group 1 was subdivided into subjects with obvious exposure to asbestos (group 1A, n = 61), and subjects with no known exposure to asbestos (group 1B, n = 33). The distribution of AB counts per ml of BALF (means +/- SEM) differed significantly between groups 1 and 2 (38.8 +/- 17.4 vs 0.06 +/- 0.04, p < 0.0001). The AB counts were significantly different between groups 1A and 1B (57.9 +/- 26.6 vs 3.4 +/- 1.2, p = 0.01). Subject, exposed to dust who had radiological evidence of pleural thickening had significantly higher AB counts than subjects in whom pleural thickening was absent (66.0 +/- 31.1 vs 5.1 +/- 4.2, p = 0.03). In group 1, the BALF was positive for AB in 7 of 14 patients with pulmonary fibrosis, 4 of 5 patients with lung cancer, all 6 patients with malignant mesothelioma, and all 4 patients with benign asbestos pleural effusion. We conclude that AB counts in BALF are useful for evaluating both the history of asbestos exposure in a population exposed to dust, as well as patients having asbestos-related diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nihon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai zasshi\",\"volume\":\"35 11\",\"pages\":\"1196-204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nihon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai zasshi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
为了评估测量支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)中石棉小体(AB)数量的临床应用价值,我们使用光学显微镜对119名受试者的BALF中石棉小体的数量进行了计数。结果根据职业史、石棉引起的肺和胸膜改变的放射学表现以及石棉相关疾病进行分析。1组94例有粉尘暴露史,2组25例无粉尘暴露史。第1组又分为明显石棉暴露者(1A组,n = 61)和无石棉暴露者(1B组,n = 33)。每ml BALF中AB计数的分布(平均+/- SEM)在1组和2组之间有显著差异(38.8 +/- 17.4 vs 0.06 +/- 0.04, p < 0.0001)。AB计数在1A组和1B组之间有显著差异(57.9 +/- 26.6 vs 3.4 +/- 1.2, p = 0.01)。有胸膜增厚放射学证据的粉尘暴露受试者AB计数明显高于无胸膜增厚的受试者(66.0 +/- 31.1 vs 5.1 +/- 4.2, p = 0.03)。在1组中,14例肺纤维化患者中有7例,5例肺癌患者中有4例,6例恶性间皮瘤患者中有4例,4例良性石棉胸腔积液患者中均有BALF抗体阳性。我们的结论是,BALF中的AB计数对于评估粉尘暴露人群的石棉暴露史以及患有石棉相关疾病的患者都是有用的。
[The clinical utility of asbestos body counts in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid].
To assess the clinical utility of measuring the number of asbestos bodies (AB) present in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), we counted the number of AB in BALF from 119 subjects using light microscopy. The results were analyzed according to occupational histories, radiological findings of asbestos-induced lung and pleural changes, and asbestos-related diseases. The 94 subjects in group 1 had a history of dust exposure, whereas group 2 subjects (n = 25) had no dust exposure. Group 1 was subdivided into subjects with obvious exposure to asbestos (group 1A, n = 61), and subjects with no known exposure to asbestos (group 1B, n = 33). The distribution of AB counts per ml of BALF (means +/- SEM) differed significantly between groups 1 and 2 (38.8 +/- 17.4 vs 0.06 +/- 0.04, p < 0.0001). The AB counts were significantly different between groups 1A and 1B (57.9 +/- 26.6 vs 3.4 +/- 1.2, p = 0.01). Subject, exposed to dust who had radiological evidence of pleural thickening had significantly higher AB counts than subjects in whom pleural thickening was absent (66.0 +/- 31.1 vs 5.1 +/- 4.2, p = 0.03). In group 1, the BALF was positive for AB in 7 of 14 patients with pulmonary fibrosis, 4 of 5 patients with lung cancer, all 6 patients with malignant mesothelioma, and all 4 patients with benign asbestos pleural effusion. We conclude that AB counts in BALF are useful for evaluating both the history of asbestos exposure in a population exposed to dust, as well as patients having asbestos-related diseases.