{"title":"[结石:介入治疗]。","authors":"T Roumeguere, C Vaessen, J Simon, C C Schulman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is actually the most popular treatment in the urolithiasis. However, different factors influence the choice of the best treatment. Great progresses appeared in the conception of performing endoscopic material which led to minimize morbidity. Percutaneous approach is very popular but require expensive material and trained operator. Indications for open surgery were reduced but didn't completely disappear. We review in the next paragraph the literature of the last five years.</p>","PeriodicalId":75424,"journal":{"name":"Acta urologica Belgica","volume":"65 3","pages":"23-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Calculi: interventional treatment].\",\"authors\":\"T Roumeguere, C Vaessen, J Simon, C C Schulman\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is actually the most popular treatment in the urolithiasis. However, different factors influence the choice of the best treatment. Great progresses appeared in the conception of performing endoscopic material which led to minimize morbidity. Percutaneous approach is very popular but require expensive material and trained operator. Indications for open surgery were reduced but didn't completely disappear. We review in the next paragraph the literature of the last five years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta urologica Belgica\",\"volume\":\"65 3\",\"pages\":\"23-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta urologica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta urologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is actually the most popular treatment in the urolithiasis. However, different factors influence the choice of the best treatment. Great progresses appeared in the conception of performing endoscopic material which led to minimize morbidity. Percutaneous approach is very popular but require expensive material and trained operator. Indications for open surgery were reduced but didn't completely disappear. We review in the next paragraph the literature of the last five years.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
