{"title":"四种种植体系统的表面比较分析。","authors":"M Hellsing","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surface analysis of similar titanium screw implants from four manufacturers (Brånemark System, 3i, Impla-Med and Restore) showed considerable differences in the composition of the surface oxides. Brånemark System implants had a markedly higher surface content of the natural oxide forming elements: titanium and oxygen. These implants also had a lower content of all contaminants (except boron) and significantly less variation in composition between different samples and points of analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":76669,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Dental Association of South Africa = Die Tydskrif van die Tandheelkundige Vereniging van Suid-Afrika","volume":"52 6","pages":"399-402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative surface analysis of four dental implant systems.\",\"authors\":\"M Hellsing\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Surface analysis of similar titanium screw implants from four manufacturers (Brånemark System, 3i, Impla-Med and Restore) showed considerable differences in the composition of the surface oxides. Brånemark System implants had a markedly higher surface content of the natural oxide forming elements: titanium and oxygen. These implants also had a lower content of all contaminants (except boron) and significantly less variation in composition between different samples and points of analyses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the Dental Association of South Africa = Die Tydskrif van die Tandheelkundige Vereniging van Suid-Afrika\",\"volume\":\"52 6\",\"pages\":\"399-402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the Dental Association of South Africa = Die Tydskrif van die Tandheelkundige Vereniging van Suid-Afrika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Dental Association of South Africa = Die Tydskrif van die Tandheelkundige Vereniging van Suid-Afrika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative surface analysis of four dental implant systems.
Surface analysis of similar titanium screw implants from four manufacturers (Brånemark System, 3i, Impla-Med and Restore) showed considerable differences in the composition of the surface oxides. Brånemark System implants had a markedly higher surface content of the natural oxide forming elements: titanium and oxygen. These implants also had a lower content of all contaminants (except boron) and significantly less variation in composition between different samples and points of analyses.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
