普通牙科第三磨牙手术。

L C Naidoo
{"title":"普通牙科第三磨牙手术。","authors":"L C Naidoo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A survey to determine the treatment procedures adopted by general dental practitioners for the removal of impacted third molar teeth was undertaken. Questionnaires were mailed to a sample of 100 practising dentists. Of the 67 per cent that responded, 41.8 per cent (28) indicated that they would attempt the procedure while the remaining 51.2 per cent (39) would not do so. Neither the length of professional experience nor whether they practised in metropolitan or country areas had a bearing on whether the impacted tooth would be removed or not. In general, South African general dental practitioners routinely removed overlying bone by means of a bur, sutured the mucosal incision wound, prescribed antibiotics, analgesics and a mouthwash, and recalled their patients for a post-operative review. Steroids were not prescribed.</p>","PeriodicalId":76669,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Dental Association of South Africa = Die Tydskrif van die Tandheelkundige Vereniging van Suid-Afrika","volume":"52 2","pages":"73-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Third molar surgery in general dental practice.\",\"authors\":\"L C Naidoo\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A survey to determine the treatment procedures adopted by general dental practitioners for the removal of impacted third molar teeth was undertaken. Questionnaires were mailed to a sample of 100 practising dentists. Of the 67 per cent that responded, 41.8 per cent (28) indicated that they would attempt the procedure while the remaining 51.2 per cent (39) would not do so. Neither the length of professional experience nor whether they practised in metropolitan or country areas had a bearing on whether the impacted tooth would be removed or not. In general, South African general dental practitioners routinely removed overlying bone by means of a bur, sutured the mucosal incision wound, prescribed antibiotics, analgesics and a mouthwash, and recalled their patients for a post-operative review. Steroids were not prescribed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the Dental Association of South Africa = Die Tydskrif van die Tandheelkundige Vereniging van Suid-Afrika\",\"volume\":\"52 2\",\"pages\":\"73-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the Dental Association of South Africa = Die Tydskrif van die Tandheelkundige Vereniging van Suid-Afrika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Dental Association of South Africa = Die Tydskrif van die Tandheelkundige Vereniging van Suid-Afrika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

进行了一项调查,以确定普通牙科医生在拔除阻生第三磨牙时采用的治疗程序。问卷邮寄给100名执业牙医。在67%的受访者中,41.8%(28人)表示他们会尝试这个手术,而剩下的51.2%(39人)不会这样做。无论是专业经验的长短,还是他们在大都市或乡村地区执业,都与是否拔除阻生牙无关。一般来说,南非的普通牙科医生会常规地用刺刀去除覆盖的骨头,缝合粘膜切口伤口,开抗生素、止痛药和漱口水,并召回患者进行术后复查。没有开具类固醇处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Third molar surgery in general dental practice.

A survey to determine the treatment procedures adopted by general dental practitioners for the removal of impacted third molar teeth was undertaken. Questionnaires were mailed to a sample of 100 practising dentists. Of the 67 per cent that responded, 41.8 per cent (28) indicated that they would attempt the procedure while the remaining 51.2 per cent (39) would not do so. Neither the length of professional experience nor whether they practised in metropolitan or country areas had a bearing on whether the impacted tooth would be removed or not. In general, South African general dental practitioners routinely removed overlying bone by means of a bur, sutured the mucosal incision wound, prescribed antibiotics, analgesics and a mouthwash, and recalled their patients for a post-operative review. Steroids were not prescribed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信