社会网络、社会支持和控制措施的信度和效度评估——来自Malmö肩颈研究的结果。

B S Hanson, P O Ostergren, S Elmståhl, S O Isacsson, J Ranstam
{"title":"社会网络、社会支持和控制措施的信度和效度评估——来自Malmö肩颈研究的结果。","authors":"B S Hanson,&nbsp;P O Ostergren,&nbsp;S Elmståhl,&nbsp;S O Isacsson,&nbsp;J Ranstam","doi":"10.1177/140349489702500407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The reliability and validity of methods to assess social networks, social support and control were investigated in a population of 12,009 females and males born between 1926 and 1945 (the \"Malmö Shoulder and Neck Study\"). This study demonstrated an overall reliability with kappa coefficients between 0.70 and 0.47, but the reliability was more varying among females and lower in the youngest age group. The analysis of the construct validity indicated that the different indices measure different aspects of the psychosocial environment, but both theoretical and methodological problems were identified, when the validity of multidimensional concepts are to be determined. The validity of such indices can best be judged by combining quantitative and qualitative methods. Potential validity problems must be kept in mind when these indices are used in epidemiological research. The results from the reliability analysis call for repeated assessments and the sample size must be adjusted vis-a-vis the reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":76525,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of social medicine","volume":"25 4","pages":"249-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/140349489702500407","citationCount":"120","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and validity assessments of measures of social networks, social support and control--results from the Malmö Shoulder and Neck Study.\",\"authors\":\"B S Hanson,&nbsp;P O Ostergren,&nbsp;S Elmståhl,&nbsp;S O Isacsson,&nbsp;J Ranstam\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/140349489702500407\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The reliability and validity of methods to assess social networks, social support and control were investigated in a population of 12,009 females and males born between 1926 and 1945 (the \\\"Malmö Shoulder and Neck Study\\\"). This study demonstrated an overall reliability with kappa coefficients between 0.70 and 0.47, but the reliability was more varying among females and lower in the youngest age group. The analysis of the construct validity indicated that the different indices measure different aspects of the psychosocial environment, but both theoretical and methodological problems were identified, when the validity of multidimensional concepts are to be determined. The validity of such indices can best be judged by combining quantitative and qualitative methods. Potential validity problems must be kept in mind when these indices are used in epidemiological research. The results from the reliability analysis call for repeated assessments and the sample size must be adjusted vis-a-vis the reliability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian journal of social medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"249-57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/140349489702500407\",\"citationCount\":\"120\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian journal of social medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/140349489702500407\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of social medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/140349489702500407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 120

摘要

评估社会网络、社会支持和控制方法的可靠性和有效性在1926年至1945年间出生的12,009名男女中进行了调查(“Malmö肩颈研究”)。本研究的总体信度kappa系数在0.70 ~ 0.47之间,但女性之间的信度差异较大,最年轻年龄组的信度较低。结构效度分析表明,不同的指标衡量心理社会环境的不同方面,但在确定多维概念的效度时,发现了理论和方法上的问题。定量方法与定性方法相结合,可以更好地判断这些指标的有效性。在流行病学研究中使用这些指数时,必须牢记潜在的效度问题。信度分析的结果需要反复评估,样本量必须根据信度进行调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability and validity assessments of measures of social networks, social support and control--results from the Malmö Shoulder and Neck Study.

The reliability and validity of methods to assess social networks, social support and control were investigated in a population of 12,009 females and males born between 1926 and 1945 (the "Malmö Shoulder and Neck Study"). This study demonstrated an overall reliability with kappa coefficients between 0.70 and 0.47, but the reliability was more varying among females and lower in the youngest age group. The analysis of the construct validity indicated that the different indices measure different aspects of the psychosocial environment, but both theoretical and methodological problems were identified, when the validity of multidimensional concepts are to be determined. The validity of such indices can best be judged by combining quantitative and qualitative methods. Potential validity problems must be kept in mind when these indices are used in epidemiological research. The results from the reliability analysis call for repeated assessments and the sample size must be adjusted vis-a-vis the reliability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信