重新考虑整体主义:对Täljedahl的回复。

L Nordenfelt
{"title":"重新考虑整体主义:对Täljedahl的回复。","authors":"L Nordenfelt","doi":"10.1177/140349489702500404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In his article Weak and Strong Holism, Inge-Bert Tljedahl criticises some modern theories of health which define health without reference to disease. As an alternative he suggests a kind of theory called Strong holism which emphasises the lawful interrelations between all ontological layers in the human being. In this reply it is argued (1) that Täljedahl does not accurately describe the contents and intentions of the criticised theories and (2) that he does not put forward any alternative theory of health. Strong holism, as characterised by Täljedahl, is a general biological and social-biological research programme, which is very fruitful for scientific research projects, but which does not suggest any particular theory of health.</p>","PeriodicalId":76525,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of social medicine","volume":"25 4","pages":"243-5; discussion 246-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/140349489702500404","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Holism reconsidered: a reply to Täljedahl.\",\"authors\":\"L Nordenfelt\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/140349489702500404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In his article Weak and Strong Holism, Inge-Bert Tljedahl criticises some modern theories of health which define health without reference to disease. As an alternative he suggests a kind of theory called Strong holism which emphasises the lawful interrelations between all ontological layers in the human being. In this reply it is argued (1) that Täljedahl does not accurately describe the contents and intentions of the criticised theories and (2) that he does not put forward any alternative theory of health. Strong holism, as characterised by Täljedahl, is a general biological and social-biological research programme, which is very fruitful for scientific research projects, but which does not suggest any particular theory of health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian journal of social medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"243-5; discussion 246-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/140349489702500404\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian journal of social medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/140349489702500404\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of social medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/140349489702500404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

Inge-Bert Tljedahl在他的文章《弱与强整体论》中批评了一些现代健康理论,这些理论对健康的定义与疾病无关。作为一种选择,他提出了一种叫做强整体论的理论,强调人类所有本体论层面之间的合法相互关系。在这个答复中,有人认为:(1)Täljedahl没有准确地描述被批评理论的内容和意图,(2)他没有提出任何替代的健康理论。强有力的整体论,如Täljedahl所示,是一项一般性的生物学和社会生物学研究方案,对于科学研究项目来说非常富有成果,但它并不提出任何特定的健康理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Holism reconsidered: a reply to Täljedahl.

In his article Weak and Strong Holism, Inge-Bert Tljedahl criticises some modern theories of health which define health without reference to disease. As an alternative he suggests a kind of theory called Strong holism which emphasises the lawful interrelations between all ontological layers in the human being. In this reply it is argued (1) that Täljedahl does not accurately describe the contents and intentions of the criticised theories and (2) that he does not put forward any alternative theory of health. Strong holism, as characterised by Täljedahl, is a general biological and social-biological research programme, which is very fruitful for scientific research projects, but which does not suggest any particular theory of health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信