梅毒与丙型肝炎感染的假阳性反应。

Israel journal of medical sciences Pub Date : 1997-11-01
E Sonmez, I H Ozerol, M Senol, N Kizilkaya, K Sahin, H Ozbilge
{"title":"梅毒与丙型肝炎感染的假阳性反应。","authors":"E Sonmez,&nbsp;I H Ozerol,&nbsp;M Senol,&nbsp;N Kizilkaya,&nbsp;K Sahin,&nbsp;H Ozbilge","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are limited data about false-positive reactions against hepatitis C virus (HCV) in syphilitic patients and false-positive reactions against syphilis in the patients with HCV infection. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the false-positivity of syphilis in patients with HCV infection, the false-positivity of anti-HCV in patients with syphilis and the validity of the serological tests in such patients. Fifty patients with positive anti-HCV, 21 patients with positive VDRL and 50 healthy subjects were studied. Syphilis serology was determined by the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test and microhemagglutination for T. pallidum (MHA-TP) test. Hepatitis C serology was determined by a second generation ELISA (Ortho Diagnostics) test for HCV antibody, and anti-HCV positive patients were tested for HCV RNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). All assays were performed on all subjects. Not only the false-positive VDRL reaction in the patients with HCV infection but also false-positive anti-HCV tests in syphilitic patients have been observed. Four patients with syphilis had positive anti-HCV and negative HCV-RNA, whereas 10% (5 of 50) of patients with hepatitis C infection had positive VDRL and these patients were negative for MHA-TP test. The rates of false-positivity of VDRL and anti-HCV were higher than within the control group (p < 0.05). According to these data, positive anti-HCV in syphilitic patients and positive VDRL in chronic hepatitis C may be false-positive results with regard to the reaginic tests. Therefore, therapeutic measures should not be initiated without confirmation with a treponemal test or PCR. VDRL and HCV-ELISA tests may be interacted with IgM or IgG antibodies. This relationship should be investigated in further studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14590,"journal":{"name":"Israel journal of medical sciences","volume":"33 11","pages":"724-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"False-positive reaction between syphilis and hepatitis C infection.\",\"authors\":\"E Sonmez,&nbsp;I H Ozerol,&nbsp;M Senol,&nbsp;N Kizilkaya,&nbsp;K Sahin,&nbsp;H Ozbilge\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There are limited data about false-positive reactions against hepatitis C virus (HCV) in syphilitic patients and false-positive reactions against syphilis in the patients with HCV infection. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the false-positivity of syphilis in patients with HCV infection, the false-positivity of anti-HCV in patients with syphilis and the validity of the serological tests in such patients. Fifty patients with positive anti-HCV, 21 patients with positive VDRL and 50 healthy subjects were studied. Syphilis serology was determined by the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test and microhemagglutination for T. pallidum (MHA-TP) test. Hepatitis C serology was determined by a second generation ELISA (Ortho Diagnostics) test for HCV antibody, and anti-HCV positive patients were tested for HCV RNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). All assays were performed on all subjects. Not only the false-positive VDRL reaction in the patients with HCV infection but also false-positive anti-HCV tests in syphilitic patients have been observed. Four patients with syphilis had positive anti-HCV and negative HCV-RNA, whereas 10% (5 of 50) of patients with hepatitis C infection had positive VDRL and these patients were negative for MHA-TP test. The rates of false-positivity of VDRL and anti-HCV were higher than within the control group (p < 0.05). According to these data, positive anti-HCV in syphilitic patients and positive VDRL in chronic hepatitis C may be false-positive results with regard to the reaginic tests. Therefore, therapeutic measures should not be initiated without confirmation with a treponemal test or PCR. VDRL and HCV-ELISA tests may be interacted with IgM or IgG antibodies. This relationship should be investigated in further studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Israel journal of medical sciences\",\"volume\":\"33 11\",\"pages\":\"724-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Israel journal of medical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel journal of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于梅毒患者对丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)的假阳性反应和HCV感染患者对梅毒的假阳性反应的数据有限。本研究的目的是证明HCV感染患者的梅毒假阳性,梅毒患者的抗HCV假阳性以及这类患者血清学检测的有效性。研究对象为50例抗- hcv阳性患者、21例VDRL阳性患者和50名健康者。梅毒血清学检测采用性病实验室(VDRL)检测和梅毒T.微血凝(MHA-TP)检测。丙型肝炎血清学采用第二代ELISA (Ortho Diagnostics)检测HCV抗体,抗HCV阳性患者采用聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测HCV RNA。对所有受试者进行了所有化验。不仅在HCV感染患者中存在VDRL假阳性反应,而且在梅毒患者中也存在抗HCV假阳性反应。4例梅毒患者抗- hcv阳性,HCV-RNA阴性,而10%(50例中的5例)丙型肝炎患者VDRL阳性,这些患者MHA-TP检测阴性。VDRL假阳性率和抗- hcv假阳性率高于对照组(p < 0.05)。根据这些数据,梅毒患者的抗- hcv阳性和慢性丙型肝炎患者的VDRL阳性可能是假阳性结果。因此,未经螺旋体试验或PCR证实,不应采取治疗措施。VDRL和HCV-ELISA试验可能与IgM或IgG抗体相互作用。这种关系有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
False-positive reaction between syphilis and hepatitis C infection.

There are limited data about false-positive reactions against hepatitis C virus (HCV) in syphilitic patients and false-positive reactions against syphilis in the patients with HCV infection. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the false-positivity of syphilis in patients with HCV infection, the false-positivity of anti-HCV in patients with syphilis and the validity of the serological tests in such patients. Fifty patients with positive anti-HCV, 21 patients with positive VDRL and 50 healthy subjects were studied. Syphilis serology was determined by the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test and microhemagglutination for T. pallidum (MHA-TP) test. Hepatitis C serology was determined by a second generation ELISA (Ortho Diagnostics) test for HCV antibody, and anti-HCV positive patients were tested for HCV RNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). All assays were performed on all subjects. Not only the false-positive VDRL reaction in the patients with HCV infection but also false-positive anti-HCV tests in syphilitic patients have been observed. Four patients with syphilis had positive anti-HCV and negative HCV-RNA, whereas 10% (5 of 50) of patients with hepatitis C infection had positive VDRL and these patients were negative for MHA-TP test. The rates of false-positivity of VDRL and anti-HCV were higher than within the control group (p < 0.05). According to these data, positive anti-HCV in syphilitic patients and positive VDRL in chronic hepatitis C may be false-positive results with regard to the reaginic tests. Therefore, therapeutic measures should not be initiated without confirmation with a treponemal test or PCR. VDRL and HCV-ELISA tests may be interacted with IgM or IgG antibodies. This relationship should be investigated in further studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信