右心房硅胶导管在血液透析中的应用及其并发症。

H P Brodersen, F Korsten, E Modlich, J Wildberger, R Thomas, D Larbig
{"title":"右心房硅胶导管在血液透析中的应用及其并发症。","authors":"H P Brodersen,&nbsp;F Korsten,&nbsp;E Modlich,&nbsp;J Wildberger,&nbsp;R Thomas,&nbsp;D Larbig","doi":"10.1023/a:1008279118248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Right atrial silicone catheters (RASCs) serve as temporary angioaccess in hemodialysis (HD) patients. In a retrospective study of the years 1989 to 1996 we analyzed catheter-related complications, and tried to define patients at special risk for complications. We compared our results with published data on RASCs and percutaneous catheters. In 73 patients older than 64 (mean age 76) years with severe comorbidity 109 single lumen RASCs, type Demers, were implanted. Fifty-five similar catheters implanted in 44 younger patients (mean age 53) with a comparable severe comorbidity were used as controls. In the older patients the mean indwelling time was 157 (1-995) days, median 98 days, in the younger patients 135 (1-623) days, median 61 days. Early complications that led to RASC removal within one week after implantation were kinking, formation of a narrow loop, perforation, infected hematoma, and immediate clotting. Reasons for removal of the RASC after a longer period were infection, occlusion, and dislocation. In the old age group a great proportion (40%) of patients died with functioning RASC. In the literature RASCs are superior to percutaneous (Shaldon) catheters as temporary angioaccess for HD with respect to both better longevity and fewer complications such as venous stenoses or occlusions or infections. This is in accordance with our experience. However RASCs have complications, especially in the high risk groups of diabetics and patients with malignancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":79490,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric nephrology and urology","volume":"7 1","pages":"29-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1008279118248","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Right atrial silicone catheters as angioaccess for hemodialysis with special emphasis to their complications.\",\"authors\":\"H P Brodersen,&nbsp;F Korsten,&nbsp;E Modlich,&nbsp;J Wildberger,&nbsp;R Thomas,&nbsp;D Larbig\",\"doi\":\"10.1023/a:1008279118248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Right atrial silicone catheters (RASCs) serve as temporary angioaccess in hemodialysis (HD) patients. In a retrospective study of the years 1989 to 1996 we analyzed catheter-related complications, and tried to define patients at special risk for complications. We compared our results with published data on RASCs and percutaneous catheters. In 73 patients older than 64 (mean age 76) years with severe comorbidity 109 single lumen RASCs, type Demers, were implanted. Fifty-five similar catheters implanted in 44 younger patients (mean age 53) with a comparable severe comorbidity were used as controls. In the older patients the mean indwelling time was 157 (1-995) days, median 98 days, in the younger patients 135 (1-623) days, median 61 days. Early complications that led to RASC removal within one week after implantation were kinking, formation of a narrow loop, perforation, infected hematoma, and immediate clotting. Reasons for removal of the RASC after a longer period were infection, occlusion, and dislocation. In the old age group a great proportion (40%) of patients died with functioning RASC. In the literature RASCs are superior to percutaneous (Shaldon) catheters as temporary angioaccess for HD with respect to both better longevity and fewer complications such as venous stenoses or occlusions or infections. This is in accordance with our experience. However RASCs have complications, especially in the high risk groups of diabetics and patients with malignancies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geriatric nephrology and urology\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"29-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1008279118248\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geriatric nephrology and urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008279118248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric nephrology and urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008279118248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

右心房硅胶导管(RASCs)可作为血液透析(HD)患者的临时血管通道。在1989年至1996年的一项回顾性研究中,我们分析了导管相关的并发症,并试图确定有特殊并发症风险的患者。我们将我们的结果与rasc和经皮导管的已发表数据进行了比较。在73例64岁以上(平均年龄76岁)伴有严重合并症的患者中,109例Demers型单腔rasc被植入。55个类似的导管植入44名年轻患者(平均年龄53岁),并有相当严重的合并症作为对照。老年患者平均留置时间为157(1-995)天,中位数为98天,年轻患者为135(1-623)天,中位数为61天。导致RASC植入后一周内切除的早期并发症有扭结、狭窄袢形成、穿孔、感染血肿和立即凝血。较长时间后切除RASC的原因是感染、咬合和脱位。在老年组中,很大比例(40%)的患者死于功能性RASC。在文献中,rasc优于经皮(Shaldon)导管作为HD的临时血管通路,其寿命更长,并发症(如静脉狭窄、闭塞或感染)更少。这与我们的经验是一致的。然而,rasc有并发症,特别是在糖尿病和恶性肿瘤患者等高危人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Right atrial silicone catheters as angioaccess for hemodialysis with special emphasis to their complications.

Right atrial silicone catheters (RASCs) serve as temporary angioaccess in hemodialysis (HD) patients. In a retrospective study of the years 1989 to 1996 we analyzed catheter-related complications, and tried to define patients at special risk for complications. We compared our results with published data on RASCs and percutaneous catheters. In 73 patients older than 64 (mean age 76) years with severe comorbidity 109 single lumen RASCs, type Demers, were implanted. Fifty-five similar catheters implanted in 44 younger patients (mean age 53) with a comparable severe comorbidity were used as controls. In the older patients the mean indwelling time was 157 (1-995) days, median 98 days, in the younger patients 135 (1-623) days, median 61 days. Early complications that led to RASC removal within one week after implantation were kinking, formation of a narrow loop, perforation, infected hematoma, and immediate clotting. Reasons for removal of the RASC after a longer period were infection, occlusion, and dislocation. In the old age group a great proportion (40%) of patients died with functioning RASC. In the literature RASCs are superior to percutaneous (Shaldon) catheters as temporary angioaccess for HD with respect to both better longevity and fewer complications such as venous stenoses or occlusions or infections. This is in accordance with our experience. However RASCs have complications, especially in the high risk groups of diabetics and patients with malignancies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信